impeachment: (especially in the US) a charge of misconduct made against the holder of a public office. for those who don't know, Hunter Biden is merely an attorney.
Why do people use bandwagoning in their arguments? "Everyone", "all", "most", etcetera... Or, simply claim that an entire group subscribes to a particular set of ideas or perform specific actions? These are called logical fallacies. They are used to make the person's premise more convincing to others by inclusion of a large, indefinite number of people to either shore up the person's "virtuous side", to serve as cautionary tales against it, or to serve as evidence of some point that the person is trying to make. These types of accusations are anecdotal, at best. Where is your factual research and your double-blind studies proving that the implied "all" believe what you claim? Who, exactly, are these "Trumpists", you speak of? When we start making up words to push our narratives, we lose credibility.
I never said all. as for your question... people like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFNML3MwdcU
How do you know that woman in this video you've posted is "actually" a Trump supporter and not some Leftist or an operative of the CIA or of the FBI creating a narrative about people who voted for and who support President Trump? Are you aware of something called, "The Boston Tea Party"? The Sons of Liberty dressed up like Native Americans and dumped the British East India Company's tea into the Boston Harbor to protest the encroaching tyrannies of King George. This trick of deception can work for good and for evil. You are completely naive to present a suspect video of some hysterical white person bleating about Trump as proof of the mindset of millions of Trump supporters.
you think that she's the only one? there's plenty of people like her: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN_sAl-xoFU&t=4s . those calling for war... like here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xINPhS5LCvE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yH6bYixIV8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALBSbNGMaYM&t=382s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRlX-DxXF7I&t=2s . I could do nothing but provide evidence all week... probably longer.
one more I want you to see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I9BAUuDRm0
So what?
I support Trump's America First policies and I did not lose my mind over his losing his bid for POTUS in 2020. The fact of the matter is, you have some anecdotal "evidence" and lots of partisan bias in favor of The Left (communism) driving your need to convince people that Trump supporters are toothless, hysterical, ignorant, unhinged, rubes. Unless you can conduct and produce the findings of a reputable survey using the responses of actual Trump supporters, you've got nothin'.
Just because unidentified nut cases are filmed in Trump gear, behaving like lunatics and fools, is not "proof". I do not care how much of these clown videos you've got being cranked out by Leftist propaganda factories.
Question:
Can someone who hates Trump and the America First movement (i. e., Antifa, BLM, etcetera) purchase Trump hats, flags, signs, tee shirts, stickers, etcetera, wear and brandish this Trump gear to make stupid Trump comments and act like overall clowns while pretending to be conservatives?
If your answer is "yes", you've admitted that your boatload of "Trumpist" evidence videos are worthless and so is your question's premise.
he never meant that. I don't need to prove anything when they do it for me in videos and in polls. I'm not gonna engage in baseless conspiracy. bigger question is why you're so desperate to protect those who hate you. until you can answer that question... I have no further desire to converse with you.
"he never meant that."
He who? Never meant what?
---------------------------------------
"I don't need to prove anything when they do it for me in videos and in polls."
They who? MSM? Biased polling companies? If you dump your brains in the sink and link up to the "boob tube" to form your belief system about the world we all must live in, of course you are going to harbor warped perceptions and inaccurate beliefs and views about other people and the real nature of existence.
----------------------------------------
"I'm not gonna engage in baseless conspiracy."
Anything that is contrary to some peoples' belief system and their way of doing things is stamped by them as "conspiracy", "baseless", and "conspiracy theory". This is not necessarily true or intellectually honest.
----------------------------------------
"bigger question is why you're so desperate to protect those who hate you."
1. What gives you the impression that I am desperate about anything?
2. What causes you to believe that I am attempting to "protect" anyone by having a calm and logical discussion with you about my opinions and point of view?
3. Who are, "those who hate you"? Your assumption that I lack the intelligence, agency, self-awareness, or self-respect to champion my own civic interests, civil liberties, or civil rights, is quite offensive. If you are a white American male, it's racist and sexist of you to imply that this black American adult female is a feeble-minded puppet of some racist political cult that "hates me". When I exercise my free speech as a U. S. natural-born citizen, it is never affiliated with nor attached to the political fronts, parties, or causes of any other group of people... white, black, purple, yellow. ETCETERA... If they believe what I believe, the more the merrier.
-------------------------------------------
"until you can answer that question... "
What question?
--------------------------------------------
"I have no further desire to converse with you."
You are not doing me any favors with your unsolicited replies to my opinions. Your propaganda train got derailed by my facts and by my analysis of your bullshit smear tactics so now you are running for the hills. So long.
''why are so determined to defend those that hate you?'' you replied to my question, genius. you did none of that.
I'm sorry you've become so broken. I hope you manage to heal someday.
I think they mean prosecuted
they mean impeached. I've had this convo... with someone numerous times who is adamant that Biden and his family will be impeached.
But only Biden can be impeached
I know... it's crazy!
Joe Biden can be impeached for threatening to withhold funds from Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor in order to protect Hunter Biden. Joe Biden is the one that committed crimes. In addition, he made a public speech encouraging businesses to ignore a supreme court ruling. Biden also abandoned American citizens in Afghanistan, intentionally endangering their lives. All of those are impeachable offenses.
first off all, that prosecutor was corrupt... even the critics acknowledge on the left admit that Hunter only got his position because because of who is father was but that's not a crime. no, he didn't--the supreme court over-ruled his mask-mandate... even though they had one. that didn't mean that he couldn't encourage individual business to protect their workers and workplaces. the evacuation was sloppy, I'll give you that. this was about Hunter Biden.
Withholding funds that were agreed to in a contract for personal/family benefits is a crime.
Biden wanted people fired that didn't take the vaccine after the supreme court ruled against it.
Kamala Harris could be impeached too because she encouraged/incited violence by encouraging the violent riots and attacking White people.
he didn't benefit him. here's the real story: www.usatoday.com/.../
Probably for the same reasons I don't like Biden
I don't support Trump mind you I just don't like Biden
Especially after he let I think it was like 400 US citizens get stranded on foreign soils with literally a bunch of terrorists.
Also he just feels like a puppet to me which I don't like that puppet leaders just aren't reliable
this is about Hunter. that's no better than what Trump did.
and I acknowledge that Biden is better but that's only because Trump is so horrible. I don't really like most politicians... save for a few mostly dems.
Whoops I got the father and sons names mixed up XD
Yeah I can't give you any opinions about biden's son because I don't care about the Biden family
Lol l. Don't worry about it. I miss the days where I was politically ignorant. Helps me focus on that instead of my real problem... Plus, I enjoy Trump's stupidity.
Yeah honestly I stopped caring about the US politics because I've accepted that I'm not going to see a president that I'm going to agree with
Although it would be nice to see Theodore Roosevelt back
Haven't heard the best about him by either side.
Although mostly the reason why I want to see Theodore Roosevelt back is because he was cool
I like Jamie Raskin, Adam Schiff, Beto and Tim Ryan.
Don't know these people
Oh, and AOC. They actually care and fight.
I'll send you some videos in a moment.
I'm a royalist and imperialist
I stay neutral... Though, that's gotten harder to do.
Opinion
15Opinion
So according to you because you heard something from one person you believe a whole collective believes the same thing. That's pretty goddamn stupid, just gotta say. Did you see their voting registration? Did you see their voting history? Have you met them in person or verified they aren't a troll? Ffs
he's in my family, genius. thought you would've have learned to get your facts straight before opening your mouth after what happened the last time.
and I swear that you're nothing but a rambling, babbling, bumbling, blithering idiot should be grateful for any attention given to your nonsense.
From the guy who idolizes pathological liars. Ain't that some serious irony.
Trump and Carlson. Trump lied over 30,000 times in office. Carlson's own lawyers argued that no sane person could believe him... they all all think that you're a blithering idiot.
Carlson taken literally on everything he says, sure. But it's not my fault if some people, including yourself can't understand satire or right wing humor. Trump lied, Obama lied, Biden lied, does that justify you lying too? I loved Ron Paul, he was the best option years ago. He would have worked to get us out of the middle east long before Trump was even a contender. Biden on the other hand voted on every single goddamn war he had the abili to vote on. Tulsi was the best choice because she was moderate and she worked along party lines and preached unity
The fact anyone ever voted for Trump is entirely the fault of Democrats. If they actually worked along part lines instead of trying to grab up power Trump would never have gotten into office. Obama refused to relent on his attack on 2A and he refused to stop overseas expansion. He also turned his back on veterans. He used divisive language during the Trayvon Martin case. That's the whole goddamn reason you ever had a Trump presidency AT ALL! LISTEN and stop writing off people just because you don't agree with them. Calling people an ism or a phobe makes them vote for people like Trump. Why is this so hard for you to wrap your head around. You sure you don't want another Trump presidency? As of now Dems are 4x more likely to vote Republican for the midterms. Wake up and get with it kid
either way--it ain't real news and shouldn't be believed. Paul ran away went things got hot. no, no one expects politicians to be truthful... it's just only one sides calls out the lies. Tusli had no real position on anything... she only wanting the attention from the wright wing... even those in her state had no idea what her position was
Do you even know what happened to the Ron Paul campaign? Insiders that were hired were working for the opposition for one thing. Also they were stealing from the campaign
By the end there was no funding left to continue running. He kept himself in to get on the card. That's more than most of the DC asshats who want to keep the majority of the money for themselves like Mitch the bitch McConnell, shit Romney, Killery, Chucky boy, Failosi, Witchine Waters, and all the other shills. Tulsi was very clear on her positions on war, guns, LGBT issues, and immigration. No one in their right mind who takes a step back to analyze wtf is going on would say, "Yeah after 20+ years of war I think what we need to fix our failing economy is... More war." Said no one ever.
s, it wasn't because he was unpopular at only 8.09%? Gabbard's a political chameleon... why do you think she'd wanna speak on CPAC or go on Fox? she's also in bed with Koch: readsludge.com/.../ anti-trans: www.washingtonblade.com/.../ friendly to Russia: www.thedailybeast.com/tulsi-gabbards-campaign-is-being-boosted-by-russophiles www.theguardian.com/.../tulsi-gabbard-2020-progressive-steve-bannon-right
Right Paul was not popular and that was because his party largely swept him under the rug and he was less known than Bernie and yet he and Bernie allied to try to end the FED. He was still an option for me on the ballots. He went down because of exactly what I said. In hindsight he was right about the FED and the bears in Iraq and Afghanistan while establishments on both sides tried to mock him
Sometimes telling the truth makes you unpopular. But it's the ones who don't go status quo that we need. I'll read the Gabbard stuff now, sec
I was thinking about Paul Ryan... too many Pauls.
Right so first let me say this... Never and I mean NEVER use the daily beast as a news source. It's a joke of a publication. All of these are left wing establishment news sources. You know they wrote smear campaigns against Bernie too do you not? So washpost is not telling me anything I didn't already know. Are you familiar with Kim Iverson? She was a progressive until maybe like a year ago. She explains well what Tulsi Gabbard was all about on the Glenn Beck show. Basically I'd you want to change a party you must remove the bad apples. Tulsi wanted to get rid of establishment shills. She slaughtered Kamala and Joe in the primary debates. That pissed off the establishment so they wrote misleading hit pieces. Please be more careful about using opinion pieces as fact because that's what those links are. Tulsi has told in great detail why she ran on the DnC platform, what she supports and doesn't, and why. It's not even hard to understand her. She was right on not starting up these regime change wars because look at Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. But she said we can't just pull out, look what happened in Afghanistan. All those people were raped and slaughtered because of the Biden admin. She was willing to work across party lines, that's what you should want. I'd you can't do that you can't represent ALL Americans and then you create deeper and deeper divisions
Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Paul Ryan... you can understand my fuck up.
Yeah it's fine but did you know that the Justice For Breonna Taylor act was written up by rand Paul? And he got stopped by BLM in the streets and almost attacked because of them being too stupid to know he was the one seeking justice for her? https://youtu.be/sf12w2EGLu0 read up, he introduced the bill but because he was a member of the RNC he was profiled and attacked... Ironically by the same group who was supposedly against such behavior. And then that missing 60 million, eh? So my point is don't just believe what the media says. Question every goddamn thing. You honestly have to these days. I use MSNBC as a news source and keep it balanced. Yes I put on Fox too but I can say I hate hannity and Laura ingraham. I cannot stand those f*cking brown noses. I hate them just like I hate Rachel Maddow and don lemon. I also read Reuters, Brietbart, I watch Kim Iverson, Jimmy Dore, Louder with Crowder, Glenn Beck, and Prager U. I also cannot stand Ben Shapiro, never liked him. I don't like wolf blitzer or Anderson Cooper or Chris Wallace. I know when someone is trying to bullshit me, I'm not stupid man. But get all aspects of a situation, not just from the side you prefer.
you're blowing it out of proportion--they only yelled at him. Dore is a fraud--look at his merch. beck is less than credible: www.politifact.com/.../?speaker=glenn-beck . Prager U of idiots like Peterson who gets by saying fancy words: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_ADtoO-f0Q&t=1s and a liar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7oZFW7H9V8 Crowder is a clown and a grifter like Shapiro... just doesn't talk as fast. Breitbart is no better than Beck: www.politifact.com/personalities/breitbart/ Kim Iverson is someone I'm not familiar with.
So for starters politifact is NOT a neutral news source AND just looking at the first example of Glenn Beck they are already lying because I watched that particular show live. He was talking about at the border they were separating children from parents candy that's absolutely happening at the holding facilities. What beck does is includes his tweets in his show by the way and brings full context. Trump did it, Obama did it, Biden is doing it. They will be reunited but not right away. Also as you should know by now the situation with the coyotes. It's done to protect the children
However it does also traumatize them. I we stopped rewarding the illegals, which by the way the left does then we wouldn't have these situations. We should only give welfare to second generation citizens onwards imho. That would help a lot. Also you must be able to fully speak the English language. I don't know if you know this but our country is bankrupt, our dollars are becoming worthless, ERs now have long lines, hospitals are understaffed, so on and so forth. That's a serious problem. Prager us not an "idiot". I know for a fact he's got degrees you could never hope to get. Prager is out of touch with social issues being an old, rich, family man. But an "idiot" he most certainly is not, as is reflected by his net worth considering he came from nothing. Follow his career from where he started. You're honestly calling Jordan Peterson stupid? You think you have the brains to have a 3 hour debate with that man and win?
No dude, don't even try. How is crowder a grifter exactly? He's always been a conservative. Shapiro is annoying AF, don't like him as I said. Breitbart is a biased news source, like the ones you linked. I make no secret of it
Don't gloss over what I said. I said listen to all sides and be able to have a conversation with them without trying to character assassinate. That's what you do from a position of weakness fyi. So don't do it. Argue your points and if you don't have an answer for something be mature enough to admit that and use, "I'm not educated enough on the subject so I'll have to look more into it and get back on it" that means you don't concede your position and can come back to argue your points later OR you might realize you were wrong on something. And so what if you are? Admitting you are wrong is a sign of maturity. Take the hit and come back better informed for next time. Not sure why Does having mercy makes him a fraud? Is his time supposed to be free? The point is he was a far left progressive nutcase who woke up. I used to be a leftist. I changed parties when I woke up in 2011 to libertarian. I registered Republican in 2016 and I will vote for Trump or DeSantis ok the future
I am doing what I think is best for my country and I stand by my choices
Even after Trump humiliated us on a daily basis? His attacks on democracy? His constant lies? The trade war that wrecked farmers? The sociopathic way he handled the pandemic that killed thousands of his own people? And DeSantis is no better.
and yeah, I am calling him stupid for contently running his mouth about things that he clearly doesn't understand.
and as for the separations, those kids came alone. the conditions, however is another matter. and apparently, Biden is trying to stop future separation: www.cnn.com/.../index.html
I also wanna address your accusation about me character assonating people--I don't do that.
You called Tucker a racist. Then I asked for quotes because surely there is evidence of racism but none to be found. Then you said, "we both know he's a racist". I can 💯 assure you I don't think he is and have never heard racist remarks spewed from his mouth. Joe Biden on the other hand...
I did and I do. I also delivered the evidence.
@Sabertooth I saw opinion pieces and zero quotation. That's not shit. You need to learn the difference between opinion and fact
That's a good start
facts are facts no matter our feelings on the matter. there's plenty going on and have gone in my life... wish they hadn't but they had and are. you literally said that immigrants make the country dirty and promotes the white replacement theory--not to mention his split views on the black lives protests and the violent attack on the capital by Trump supporters.
I promoted such things where? Show me where I said that. I'm getting married to a woman native go El Salvador. Show me where I spewed any white race rhetoric. Many immigrants DO make the plan s dirtier. Please come to Azusa, Covina, Glendora, Uptown, or Ontario because any place that is dense with immigrants has lots of litter, rats, abandoned cars, etc
That's not racist, that's a fact. A fact my girlfriend brought up to me and then showed WHY she wants to get away from all them and move into a whiter neighborhood. That's her saying it and me just observing the truth. They're also VERY misogynistic around here not allowing their wives to leave the house alone or allowing them to work I'd they want to. I just listened to this one Chico talk down to his chica in horrible ways. Ways I would never dream of talking to my like. BLM is a group of fraud, terrorism, racism, bigotry, vandalism, and and division. They're a hate group built around greedy people who stole from black people as a whole. $60 mil unaccounted for. I've done more for black lives than BLM and that's a fact. I've written about it in the past in mytakes. I went into Riverside. I went into some of the nastiest, most violent cities in the downtown areas of Delaware with higher homicide and assault stats than Detroit. Why did more of the Jan 6th people get acquitted of any wrong doing? Why did the cops wave them into them into the state buildings in various locations of they weren't welcome?
I never said that you said anything racist. most of the violence by the blm was done by white extremists--that's been well documented. those people broke into the capital, shitted in the halls, beat cops, stole the things... we know how Carlson feels about theft... maybe because those cops agreed with em.
correction, ''he''. not sure what happened there. as for your question--even the left called out the leader on that.
Well they had no choice but to. But Carlson had been calling out for that months before a peep show it was being swept under the rug. Carlson is an asset imho because his voice reaches so many. Now weather you want to believe it or not people from abc, nbc, and CNN all watch his show. They use it to try to get over on Fox and Bose versa
But it's good to know some at those networks decided to finally look into it, of only to try to dismantle Carlson. They found it to be true. BLM is not worth defending. It's corrupt to the core. I have no issue with disenfranchised black people forming something to feel like they are better understood or sharing their issues with the world. But BLM ain't it. It's a get rich quick scheme for a few con artists that duped desperate people. It's sad really but I hope it's a wake up call for the ones who sipped the koolaid.
Carlson only wanted racial outrage... he gets that in spades. that's why so many watch his show and not for actual news--I'm sorry but consider things like this to be a form of actual news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKbMSqaFFpU as for BLM: apnews.com/.../virus-outbreak-race-and-ethnicity-suburbs-health-racial-injustice-7edf9027af1878283f3818d96c54f748
Dude seriously that's clearly Tucker doing the same shit Crowder and Mark Dice and Jesse Waters do
It's basically "look how f*cking stupid these people bashing Trump are" sort of deal. There are times he ia dead serious candy times he is not. That's what keeps it fresh. Every show is not serious, sometimes a big joke. And it's hardly can example of him being racist. As for the articles I'll have to wait it's hella late here
I've never seen this kinda idiocy on more left-leaning channels. and again, Carlson's own lawyers admit that he's full of bullshit. watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcjWFySG5tI
Dude just look https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ring-of-fire/
uh... not sure how credible the person who wrote that is--they claimed that they lied about the ' Dan Crenshaw Shouted at a 10-Year-Old Girl at an Event.'' video when they actually played the video of him doing exactly that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leMJAJG_GJA
this speaks to their credibility: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAqoUhNXBpE .
They’ll impeach him anyway. The trial will air on Newsmax and Mike Lindell will preside. JFK Jr. will return from the great beyond to proclaim him guilty. There will be firm erections as a result at swap meets and monster truck rallies across the nation.
Who's saying that, one of your bot accounts? Maybe you should stop smoking crack. You posting stupid propaganda doesn't stand in the way of all of them being criminally prosecuted. It's pretty easy to understand that Hunter Biden can be arrested for his crimes as can everyone surrounding him that is connected to the criminal conspiracies Hunter is involved with. That is a large network of criminals, some of which are impeachable.
Because anything is possible in trump world. Including calling together a joint session of Congress to vote on impeaching someone who does not hold any elected office.
We don't fool. More bull shit from Trump hating liberal. Like you made up Russia elected Trump in 2016. Like your lie about prostitutes peeing on Trump in bed in England. Like your lie he cheated on taxes when he made no money. Like your lie about pro Quo Ukraine. Like your lie Trump told followers to burn down Washington DC.
a relative of mine who supports Trump does. there's evidence to back up all those claims.
He would have been impeached for that. So no , more lies. I doubt if he likes Trump he would. Sounds like another lie. Is your friend Adam Shitty Schiff? He had direct sources and said he would prove it. Where is his proof? There is none. He could have turned info over for all of us to see.
the republicans got Trump off--they didn't hide their partiality. and yes, a relative did. no but I respect him. I know reality sucks... has my entire life but reality is what it is.
Bias is liberal media working for DNC. Asking the which stories they should run
I don't know and I have Never heard anyone advocate for that... LOL
trying to be vague. family.
hehe! good one. still, beats my birth family--alcoholics, drug addicts and drug dealers... family of criminals. I got my last named changed--I got no reason to protect them... you can guess how my childhood might've been like.
my mother did.
I think you've got it wrong. Some people think President Joe Biden should be impeached because he assisted his son Hunter when Joe was Vice President. That's not going to happen.
a relative of mine really thinks this. I know it's nonsense.
Uh, oh! Somebody's been listening to too much CNN, again!
EVERYTHING ANYONE says that is anti-Trump is Always connected to CNN to you people...
And?
Maybe if you had a fucking brain, we wouldn't jump to that conclusion!!
I do have a brain. I'm not the one waiting on the fabled election of this massive voter fraud.
If you HAD a brain, you WOULD be!!
how many chances has Trump and his allies had to supply their evidence?
@gguy767 I've never seen a cut version. he was clearly talking about the bulk. how do you justify this: www.wsj.com/.../donald-trump-keeps-up-attacks-on-judge-gonzalo-curiel-1464911442
D'y'ever think that MAYBE BeMuse blocked you just because he didn't want to put up with anymore of your bullshit?
maybe if he actually engaged with me.
Lol most Trump supporters are degenerates. So you answered your own question.
Nobody thinks Hunter can be impeached. He should be locked up for along time though.
apparently, it's not a wide believe. still, this person really beliefs... must've something Greene or Boebert either of them are dumb enough to believe it. according to the guy who actually looked at the lab top... there ain't nothing there.
believe it and suggest it.
Ha! Strawman argument. Nobody in their right mind thinks Hunter can be impeached. And if someone concludes there was corruption within the Biden family, it doesn’t automatically mean they love trump. They could just love Bernie or even Hillary.
He got it from somewhere and it wasn't from me. He's a regular Fox News viewer.
Yeah. I don’t think you’ll have to worry about Trump in 2024.
sounds like he might've heard it from Boebert or Greene... either are dumb enough to suggest it.
Nobody said they were bright they just shoot their mouths off like trump
They’re the same people who use words like Trumpists thinking it’s a real word 😉
the person who told me that is a Trumpist, genius.
Since when is Trumpist a real word?
Did you miss the winky emoji?
No one thinks that. Indicted is completly different than impeachment.
he got the idea from somewhere.
#1 WTF is a “trumpist”?
Seriously, what the fuck is that?
the people who worship him like a god who literally fell to pieces after he lost the election--there's videos of them crying and babbling nonsense... like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFNML3MwdcU
They are not too bright.
I have literally never heard that.
apparently, it isn't wide spread. he got it from somewhere... guessing it was either Greene or Boebert... either of those idiots are stupid enough to suggest it. can't prove it but if anyone made the suggestion--it'd be them.
They are not known to have any brain cells
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions