Since Johnny Depp won, does this mean men can finally go back to doing whatever the fuck we want without the fear of being persecuted?

[Anonymous]

[Fireguy17]

No, you still have to be respectful, but hopefully this was an isolated incident.

[anylolone]

Nope, but to be honest, that's never true.
You have to always watch what you do (even if being 100% peaceful and honest) in order to keep yourself safe.

[Anonymous]

Why would winning a defamation suit send that message?

[MzAsh]

No this means nothing for you common folk.

[Snakeyes7]

No... that was never the case.

[OddBeMe]

Yeah sure…. you go first.

[anylolone]

Hey, you already went first, you clearly don't watch what you do, and what you want is not exactly amenable to the general public.

[OddBeMe]

@anylolone

[OddBeMe]

checking... gun control... abortion... anti-trump. All majority polling.

[anylolone]

Drag shows for kids, the last taboo, cops shouldn't stop crime, infanticide, disarming the populous to make them defenseless.

Summing you up in two sentences "I want you money not your life!" + "You think my life is worth less than your stuff!!!"

[OddBeMe]

@anylolone like a moron, you're looking non-scientific polling that frames gun safety as “disarming”

[anylolone]

"gun safety", by infringing into the 2A, that's disarming. It's funny how you focus on that, another self-report from you.

[OddBeMe]

@anylolone just fyi- the a in “2a” means amendment. Root word: amend.

[anylolone]

As in "constitutional amendment".
As in inherent, integral, fundamental, essential.

I already schooled you on this point.

Also, here's a few definitions of amend:
To make it right, to put it right, to fix it.

But I'm not dishonest like you, it does mean addition (as well as making it right) there.
Essential addition.

I find it funny how you think the 14th is just an addition.

[OddBeMe]

@anylolone so prohibition was an amendment. Then overturned by the 21st amendment.

[OddBeMe]

And the 14th was “added” in the 1860s…so yeah an addition.

[anylolone]

Yes, an essential addition, and aso a big "making it right".

Not the only one added though. Also, not all federal laws and statues added as constitutional amendments, it's like it's not just a simple addition... Could it be that the majority of laws aren't constitutional for a reason? Like the word matters?

I know you want to repel the 14th, you won't be able though, and much less with the 2nd and the 1st.

[OddBeMe]

@anylolone repel? No. Or even repeal. But you right wingers can’t wrap your mind around the fact the founders wanted us to amend the constitution.

[anylolone]

Actually what they said was "when the commies hit the top, topple the whole thing and make a new one better equipped against them" or something on those lines.

Oh, when it comes to amending it, the point is adding stuff to it, like the 14th, until it becomes bloated and needs to it's fat to be cut down. (which more precisely means merging amendments.)

[OddBeMe]

@anylolone no, dumbass. Or there’d still be slaves wouldn't there?

[anylolone]

Nope, dumbass, read what I wrote again and stop playing a fool.

That's literally the point. Add until it becomes bloated then summarize into fewer amendments by throwing away the old constitution after free helicopter rides for holier than thow degenerate aristocrats infiltrate and misuse enough of the administrative positions, a revolution by what you call "the regressive, reactionary, proletariat", a few nurenberg trials for the mengels, and mussiloni's goodbyes for the "elite theory" or "vanguardists" social engineers of the world.

But that's only if you keep pushing. We know it's bloated when you gain too much purchase.

[Anonymous]

Nice, yet another female with a blue GAG account.

[fireforeffect]

Watch your Language!!!