
If there was a political candidate whose policies you like, but this photo of her became public, would you still vote for her?


It depends on how long ago that was taken and what she did. I mean, it looks kinda silly, but she deserves some slack if this was when she was young and stupid. It's better than her actually being a porn star, a criminal, or did blackface several, SEVERAL times, I assume. Being a sex worker, or criminal, or idiot, is way worse than a girl looking kinda slutty and getting high at a Halloween party.

So imma say "Yes." I don't believe in Cancel Culture.
Also, those are sweet mega-mammaries! Are those double D's?

Now tell me who she is, OP. Is this you? Are you running for office?
if white chicks is okay, then what trudeau did was okay... and i don't even like trudeau
Nobody said White Chicks was okay. I'm not even talking about the whiteface; that movie was just a comedy abortion! (At least, in 16 states until 2023.) I don't even care about blackface/whiteface as much as I care about hypocritical woke assholes who accuse others of the things they often do.
Now, who is this stacked beauty running for office?
Personally I think it's all okay. Whiteface, blackface, n-gg-r, cr-ck-r, we just need to learn to laugh at ourselves and not take things so seriously.
She's not actually running for office, this was a hypothetical question used as a personal social experiment.
How did you make the photo seem less dark and shadowy?
I agree. Words only have as much power as you allow them to have. It's why "nigga" was created as a reclamation word to depower "n*gger" to begin with. Until stupid-ass SJW's had to go and make "nigga" a "naughty, bad, no-no word," too despite that literally being against the entire reason it exists.
Regarding certain careers, yes, some people with sketchy backgrounds, shouldn't be doing certain jobs. I don't want criminals being police officers or porn stars being schoolteachers. But just one photo isn't indicative of someone's character. We'd need to know the whole story before condemning them as being incapable of properly handling a position. (Not that politicians are usually of good moral character, to begin with.)
It's basic color correction. Alter the contrast, add more gamma correction (brightness), maybe even increase the saturation if its too colorless. It takes seconds to do.
thanks
What’s the worst thing the picture proves, she’s vaping?
Or, should I judge her based on a Halloween costume? My past Halloween costumes include a tampon, a dirty old man (trench coat and pockets full of candy) and a 300 pound deputy with a box of doughnuts in one hand and a coffee cup in the other. I also dressed as Santa Claus for a Halloween party at Hooters and posed for pictures with waitresses sitting on my lap.
I am in no position to throw stones. And, while I would not use appearance as a criteria, I certainly won’t hold being hot against a candidate. I wouldn’t vote for AOC, but I think she is good looking. I donated to Tulsi Gabbard’s campaign, but not because she’s hot.
@MCheetah you may be biased by knowing who AOC is. I know women who voted for Bill Clinton because he was good looking or John Jerry because they thought John Edwards was hot. I’ll spend too much money on mediocre food at Hooters because the waitresses are cute, but I won’t use that criteria for electing the leader of the free world.
Opinion
14Opinion
I have no problem separating public and private lives. If she has fun in private and does the kind of job I like in public, she would get my vote.
Looks like AC/DC to me. That's a good start.
However... VOTING? - I'm done with the 'democratismic' deception show.
She’s a human being at the end of the day, why should I criticize her for lifestyles in the past?
Is she vaping? That's it? That's pretty mild as far as scandals go.
Showing off her big boobs...
And? Women have boobs. It's called Science.
you don't have to show them off like that...
I mean, I agree, but... Everything is contextual, you know? She appears to be at a party. So I don't see that outfit as being inappropriate for that setting.
Now, if she's very religious, then that's slightly different. Because religious people have somewhat stricter standards.
For example, if I knew a chick from church and she dressed like that, then I would be like "hmm... 🧐"
But then again, if it was a nonreligious woman, but I gawked at her, then I would be guilty as well. So... 🤷
It's complicated, ya know?
Having said that, I'm a heterosexual man, and I do like female breasts very much.
I don't know. I can tolerate all but the "douche flute".
what's the douche flute?
What she's got in her mouth there. You've never heard that term? They're called that because of only douchebags use vapers.
lots of cool people vape
Your opinion. Not mine.
Maybe , if she convinced me she was a real Christian now
everyone has a past, some hide it better than others... I am okay with it.
Yes, she is kinda hot.
I don’t think she has any experience
assume this photo was from her college years and she is in her thirties now
My vote would be all but guaranteed.
Depends. Is this at maralago?
It is not proof that she hasn't changed.
No no no
Hell yes.
You can also add your opinion below!