What do you think of social media companies blocking conservative speech yet allowing disturbing posts of mass shooters?

[Pterodon]

They then call for gun bans after the fact when if they had used the laws in their states they could have prevented the shootings

[RedThread]

When you sign up to use those sites they give you terms and conditions. Not only that but they're a private business with the right to block or allow any content they want. If you or anybody else has issues with the way mainstream social media companies run their platforms, you could create your own competitive platforms that prop up your own ideologies. That's the beauty of capitalism. Create a competing platform that with like-minded folks and it should explode in popularity with all those who dislike how current social media platforms are being operated.

[Pterodon]

Ignoring red flag laws that could’ve prevented shootings should be a crime. It’s called enabling

[Guy13]

They want to drive the narrative to remove guns from society in steps towards martial law.

[BillyBalls]

Social media also allows dictators whose regimes oppress certain groups to post unimpeded.

And they banned Trump for saying goofy stuff

[jshm2]

It's called a "ToS" you old fart.

Conservatives, tend to break them easily - mass shooter posts don't. That should tell you more about the intellect of conservatives.

[genericname85]

they clearly have an agenda. they are led by libtards. so what do you expect? give a platform to right wingers?

[ArtemisSilver]

Obviously it's a power game