I think making all women nervous about not having any options if they got accidentally pregnant would be a pretty strong deterrent đ¤đ¤ˇââď¸
1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No it's time that people start being more responsible when two people get together and they know that they're not using protection and the odds are 60/50 that the girls going to get pregnant you can't just go get an abortion I I am 100% pro-life every time that I had sex with a woman I made sure that I work on them I made sure I asked the questions are you on the pill I protected the both of us because I was not ready to bring a child into the world but just to go out and f*** and have sex and not give a f*** if you get pregnant or not is wrong now on the other hand if a girl goes out and gets raped and wants to get an abortion and there's people giving her s*** I will stand right in front of her and leave the way to the abortion clinic I will fight anybody that tells her that she cannot get an abortion because that is her right as a human being as a woman it's being done because people are not being responsible and I think that's wrong on both parties before you stick your dick in a woman you have a choice to either protect yourself and her or not but you do not protect yourself have a child and then go get an abortion that is wrong but if a woman is abused in any manner and did not ask for this and she wants an abortion I will do everything in my power to lead the way for her I will fight for her
00 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
3.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Okay first off to my chagrin abortion is not totally illegal in the United States. The Dobbs decision simply puts abortion back to the states so Texas can make abortion illegal and California can make abortion legal.
That being said Iâm all for the overturning of Robbie Wade I think abortion is murder. Of course everyone makes exceptions to the death of the mother this is why ectopic pregnancies or a 10 year old getting pregnant is not murder because it puts their mothers life at risk.
Beyond rape and interest which should be legal for abortion I donât think itâs a cock block. I think women should be marrying the guy there in our relationship with and it should last until death. I think both men and women should save themselves until marriage. Thatâs true that men want sex. Itâs also true thatâs women tame men. A woman having sex with a guy should require a lifetime commitment. how much case you can have sex for fun and to have children. I think both men and women should stay with the person they were having kids well if youâre not willing to have a kid with somebody you shouldnât be having sex with that person. If this means that women are more strictive on whom they have sex with Iâm all for that. Donât have sex with somebody youâre not wanting to have a kid with Iâm 29 years old August 10 I am a virgin because I havenât found the woman I want to have kids with and spend the rest of my life with. Am I the exception maybe but I would rather stay a virgin my entire life then have a child I helped to produce be put to death. I have dated many liberal women who want to have sex I say I want to wait and then I get dumped.
this is why I have four rules when it comes today
no liberals
no Christians
no kids
no fat women
10 Reply
+1 yIn all honesty, I think banning abortion is partially taking away women's rights. Now, I am not a feminist, but when it comes to abortion, this is where I like to share my opinion on.
The toxic people saying, "If she closed her legs, then this wouldn't have happened.", "If she would have made the guy use protection..." yada yada, y'all should look at the cons of being pregnant and giving birth. Women can die from being pregnant, during giving birth and after giving birth. Not only that, but we do also not want to stress about having a kid, all because of we can't even abort. "Then give your kid up..." No! Don't even say that! The woman isn't ready for a child. Just because she isn't ready, does not mean that she likes the idea of giving her baby up. Some mothers cannot even provide for their baby yet will still want their baby in a few years' time, and they won't even be a baby anymore. If I was in this situation where I know I cannot provide for my baby and have to give them up, I know for sure that I'll track my baby down when I am ready and will kidnap my own child and raise them on my own, and I wouldn't care if they are a teenager.
All I know, there may be either lots of miscarriage percentages, or there would be at least 10 years until women in 2022 doesn't want to have unprotected sex with their partners because they know that they would not be able to provide for their baby if the abortion ban still stands. Just imagine the US with less and less children, all because of the abortion ban.
Also, for the men, it would most defiantly be a cock block. I know birth control is a thing, but you may have to pay the exact same price just as giving birth in a hospital.11 Reply- +1 y
@youryeodongsaeng A woman should not be belittled like that, and I sympathize with Women, I always have. I don't think a Woman who has been raped or was a victim of incest should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. Not all Guys are assholes, You could always fire back that the guy shouldn't haves dipped His dipstick and She wouldn't have gotten pregnant
4.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. What funny is that it seems a lot of men think this means more chaste women for them to marry. No lol. It means LESS women who want to have sex with you, everâŚand risk having your babies.
331 Reply- +1 y
Nature is healing...
- +1 y
I kinda doubt that tbh. Iâm pretty positive this is going to result in women being more chaste
- +1 y
More selective, as in only fucking guys they actually have a future with? Fine by me. And Ur right more is needed. Men need to collectively start rejecting whorish women. Itâs ok tho they already are those women just wonât realize until they are 40 and still unmarried.
- +1 y
Row v Way means women will be more responsible who they sleep with, considering that who they sleep with, could end up being their one and only. It's very unfortunate this happened so late. I think the generation below me and below them will benefit more from it. But it's passing it down the states so it still doesn't mean anything yet. Might have strange unnatural migration state to state issues or other unknowns. For anyone who wants love, what the senate did, is a good thing.
- +1 y
Iâm long off the market but I know what Iâd do if I were looking for a man in todays climate. Id never meet a man who ever went on a dating app. Id focus on how he views women and views the world. He must respect women and their choices. Iâd choose only the most agreeable and cooperative man who lives up to the standards he asks of a woman and a man who has sharpened his emotional regulation, listening and communication skills. He must know how to act cool when he doesnât get his way. And he must know how to respect my boundaries and when to step back and let me take the lead in certain areas. He doesnât have to be rich but his character, behavior, attitude must be pristine.
- +1 y
- +1 y
So an abortion ban makes women less willing to have sex with men who they donât see a future with? Correct? Which would make a serious long term relationship easier correct?
- +1 y
Maybe but it also makes them less likely to not have sex with any man. But nice try there lmao. Iâve literally never had a woman ask that before we fucked and itâs not like I canât lie. I probably wonât want to date them anyways.
- +1 y
Iâve literally asked women straight up that I talked to for less than 20 minutes if theyâve wanted to fuck and multiple ones have said yes. Plzzzz go on about how ur all morally righteous with the guys u fuck. Iâve literally told a girl that she was âdefinitely not the girl to date and I just want to hate fuck herâ and she went for it. Iâm pretty sure I could be honest and it still wonât matter lmao
- +1 y
Yes I have.
- +1 y
I mean for a relationship not sex. And before u ask I see where this is going. double standards. If there were kinky virgin women who wanted to wait with me Iâd go for it but that doesnât exist so Iâm just not dating anyone. Because either I am not sexually compatible with them or not romantically compatible with them.
- +1 y
This is part of the problem. Men want to have sex with foolish, immature or otherwise low quality girls like youâve had, but at the same time act like theyâd go for a chaste woman worth marrying. But the chaste woman worth marrying arenât going to want a guy who used to smash foolish girls in his past.
- +1 y
Yeah I know. Iâm not compatible with those women anyways. Those women by and large are not kinky or sexually adventurous so we wouldnât be sexually compatible the only virgin women I am really compatible with are those who just happen to be virgins and arenât saving themselves for anything. I think those are my type.
- +1 y
They do theyâre just rare. Every whore was a virgin at one point.
- +1 y
It seriously effects my mental health if they are not like to the point itâs just not healthy. Itâs not fair to them or myself.
- +1 y
It makes me irrationally angry and jealous. Like Iâm spending my life with this girl. My whole life, the only one I have. And some other guy got the most intimate moment with her? It makes me feel like shit. It makes me feel embarrassed, and jealous. I want to share the most intimate moment of her life with her. The idea that some other guy would have that is just absolutely repulsive to me I don't know how else to explain it. I feel like I need the most intimate moment of their life or I canât be intimate with them. Someone else is already more intimate with them.
- +1 y
Haha yeah, they donât like the competition anxiety. They know ignorance is bliss and the less men a womanâs been with, the less likely sheâll be able to accurate compare him to anyone else. They want women to stay in scarcity mindset because he canât lose if no one else is in the race.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
86Opinion
5.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Definitely, even though it doesn't effect me, personally.
I think it's complete bullshit. Government meddling in reproduction by defining the beginning of life is authoritarian. It's also ironic considering the fact that government doesn't give one dry fuck about human life.
I strongly support ready access to the morning after pill; chemical abortion up to 8 weeks of pregnancy; and even medical abortion up to at least the end of the first trimester. I start to have more of a problem with later term abortions unless there is a medical reason to terminate.
I don't like abortions. I think they should be used as a last resort because people who don't want to get pregnant should be using contraceptives in the first place.
But you're right, it's almost like they want women to refrain from sex or risk pregnancy. Fucking ass holes.22 Reply1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The majority of the time sex is completely risk free when both parties are smart about it. So not all women and men are worried about abortion becoming a state issue and it being illegal in several states. Because both the women and men not worried, where already not being stupid about sex. Now it's a different story for the men and women that want to be stupid about sex and use abortion as a safety net. I. E. those that decide hookups are great and are willing to take on the higher risk of unwanted pregnancies and STD's that come with them.
So to me it's about "OH my god abortion is no longer federally protected! I'm worried and she is worried." It's more about well I never treated abortion as a safely net and only have been intimate with women that did the same. So I'll continue to be smart about sex and chose my partners wisely. Instead of screwing the random woman I meet on social media a short time ago.
11 Reply- +1 y
Ok donât take this the wrong way, Iâm married and have only ever had sex with one guy in my life so thatâs my personal stance, but I donât think my veiw is better than the view of people who wish to be free with their sexuality đ¤ˇââď¸. Also even when in contraception I feared pregnancy, I still do! If I knew there was no option for me to get out of unwanted pregnancy Iâd stop having sex with my husband.
- 4.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yLmao. WellâŚ. I think itâs more designed to be cock-block to women than anyone. Of course theyâll TELL YOU itâs for some other reason, try to claim some moral/religious high groundâŚ. but they arenât fooling anyone. I think thatâs what bothers me most, that they think the rest of us are that stupid that weâd believe that this has much to do about that, while believing it has nothing to do with guys who donât pull chicks with any sort of ease trying to stop everyone else from getting laid. Itâs punitive retribution with an embarrassingly thin veil.
13 Reply- +1 y
This country is fighting a tough battle against crazy theocrats who think THEIR religion needs to be YOUR religion, and that our entire society should be founded on that religionâs standards. Multicultural country, but some people expect one particular culture to be the standardđ Itâs starting to get crazy. Canât have an abortion, but being allowed to shoot the shit out of people you have disagreements with us all good. Our priorities are absolutely FUCKED. Incels bitter about their lack of success with women or men with unrealistic expectations of marrying chaste women because of their own personal sexual insecurities is driving all this, but they canât say that out loud, so they make it into a âmurderâ issue, but then donât have the same energy for murder by way of mass shootings, then itâs all about âconstitutional rightsâ all of a sudden, and âhow dare the government involve themselves in my businessâ, without even a hint of ironyđđđ
1.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. 1. Overturning Roe v Wade did NOT "ban abortion." That is a liberal lie that for some reason people believe even though they can easily look it up and see that it is NOT true. It gave each state the ability to pass laws on it because abortion was NEVER in the constitution either way (for or against) so the federal government had no legal ability to ever approve or ban it.
2. If abortion isn't legal (they have exceptions for rape, incest, and the mother's health when in danger) it ONLY affects promiscuous/hook up/friends with benefits/casual sex people. It affects men AND women, but only the ones engaging in casual sex. The good people that only have sex within a committed relationship have nothing to be concerned about. So basically, it only would affect the many immoral people.
20 Reply5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The federal government did not, and now cannot ban abortion unilaterally. The supreme court's decision only kicked it back to the state level, for which only a handful of states actually banned it outright.
The irony is that the specific issue that more or less dragged Roe back into the supreme court in the first place was people complaining about Mississippi's abortion law, which was more lenient than almost all European countries on the subject. The culture really screwed the pooch when it went from "safe legal and rare" to treating it like a form of birth control that demanded to be viewed as empowering and celebratory.
00 Reply- 8.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThe ting is, women have LOTS of options! The pill, the morning after pill, rubbers, creams, foams, sponges, diaphragms, cervical caps, I. U.. D.'S, the female condom, the rhythm method, making him pull out before he cums, abstinence.
Anyway, I think that's a REALLY STUPID, BULLSHIT law!! Because of that, now, we're gonna go right back to the `70's where pregnant girls use coat hangers and such to give themselves an abortion and risk killing themselves or completely ruining their chances of ever having kids, again!!
00 Reply - 354 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yAbortion was not banned in the US. The outrage you see is a mix of ignorance, anger and a fundamental lack of understanding. The supreme court did not ban abortion, they deemed the Roe v Wade ruiling outside the bounds of federal powers. According to the constitution "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people". This applies for our bill of rights too. To make a long story short each state has the right to make abortion legal or illegal. That is the correct ruiling, however the house and Senate have the right to make it a federally guaranteed law and the democrats had the majority in both for years and never did. Now the moronic outcry by the democrats is hypocritical to say the least. I'm pro choice by the way.
20 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yUmm no. You have 10 different other types of contraception. Abortion is what happens when you arenât using contraception and practicing safe sex. If you want to avoid contraception and just have abortions, the. Move to a place that allows abortions.
23 Reply- +1 y
You have never had to be responsible for using contraception aye? Or had to rely on it with 100% security. Youâd be surprised how many women in contraception get pregnant but even more so how many still worry about pregnancy while on contraception. Guys donât have to worry though đ¤ˇââď¸
Opinion Owner+1 yCondom, morning after pill, depo shot, insertions, pull out, anal, ect⌠all methods to not get pregnant with 99% accurate. If you get pregnant itâs because yaâll werenât following directions and used them wrong or just werenât using them at all. Itâs time for people to learn to use contraceptions.
+1 yFirst, you're ignorant- the government didn't ban abortion. The states now have the right to restrict abortion in line what what the popular will dictates (in conservative states they can ban it, in progressive states they can murder all the infants they want).
Second, maybe more cocks should be blocked- or women should have greater risk in having sex. Our culture is overly sexed, and both men and women are suffering because of it.
16 Reply- +1 y
@wittymilf I believe it will be, thank God I am older and have Children and Grandchildren
- +1 y
If you don't care, then you wouldn't be curious enough to ask.
- +1 y
6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. In a way, yeah. The jealously of some men over the thought that other men are getting lots of ass is certianly a driving factor in the PR for abortion bans. "Make the girls who jumped on someone else's dick instead of mine suffer" is pretty obviously a motive.
22 Reply- +1 y
@MzAsh the decision was passed (in my opinion, undecided) due to declining population, maybe us looking at the results of Japan.. also what he said sounds true, but more like... An unrelated flavor. I'm correcting that the decision wasn't for that reason, while at the same time, you don't want to be a guy these last few decades in the USA unless you are top 10% where ever... You... Go..
1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No I don't think it's a cock block, they will still try. You on the other hand should clearly be more restrictive. And that is a good thing. You shouldn't be sleeping with anyone you can't consider to be with for the rest of your life while you think he also will stay around. It should be treated as that important move even if abortion is legal.
01 Reply5.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The federal goverrnment didn't ban abortion.
The US Supreme Court said that there's no fundamental personal right to an abortion.
So, state governments are each treating abortion however they see fit.
In some states, this means banning almost all abortions.
In others, nothing has changed.06 Reply- +1 y
Actually, you CAN get an abortion.
It just depends on the state and, if you are pregnant and live in a state without abortion, you can travel to a state with abortion. (*)
(*) This may become a major legal issue over the next two years.
In the United States, we have the Constitutionally-permitted ability to freely travel among the states, but freedom to travel to commit a crime is not. So, states with abortion laws may try and create laws against travelling across state lines to get an abortion. However, such a law would be difficult to enforce; any woman who privately knows she's pregnant may travel, get the abortion, and then return with none the wiser other than the doctor that did the abortion.
- +1 y
For instance, I live in the US state of Missouri. It's a "red state" meaning it is controlled by the Republicans aka the GOP. Many voters here are idiots - the kind of people who think Jesus wrote the Constitution and that the 2020 election was stolen. We have an idiot narcissistic senator and felon running for senator.
A short distance away from where I live is Illinois; a state that is "blue" - not controlled by the GOP and thus is not filled with idiots. In Illinois, you can get an abortion. So, women who live near me and are pregnant but want an abortion will travel 1 hour east to Illinois to get their abortion. This is making life difficult for abortion providers just over the border because of the uptick in women seeking one at their clinics. - +1 y
This is the nutty guy, Eric Greitens, who is running for the US Senate from Missouri.
www.nytimes.com/.../...i-senate-eric-greitens.html
Well first federal government put the decision back to the states to decide, they didn't ban it.. Secondly, people especially young people were having less sex anyways, so I highly doubt this will affect anything.. Thirdly, it's not hard to prevent an unwanted pregnancy.. Also before Roe V Wade was overturned America had some of the most liberal abortion laws out there..
10 Reply- 6.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNo, it shouldn't make much difference. Abortion was illegal back in the 1960s and that was the decade known for free love... and lots of it.
11 Reply The Supreme Court admitted that they had made an illegal ruling that violated American's Constitutional rights and thus stripped the Federal Government of any authority on the issue. Some states made laws dealing with abortion that differ from the old assumption. In some states abortion clinics have closed. Learn the law and stop spreading propaganda.
00 Reply1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No. I am pro choice. However I was responsible and always asked my partners what they would do in the case of unintended pregnancy. Now I suppose I would not be sexually active with someone who responded that she is unable/unwilling to travel beyond state lines or unwilling to put the child up for adoption.
00 Reply
+1 yI don't think its a guys job to really care about that, he might care about risking child support but then could run away anyways.
Its always been us women that have to be very careful, making guys wear condoms, getting IUDs, bc, etc...
10 Reply
+1 yThat's an interesting possible side effect, although plain common sense should lead people to understand that abortion is an ethic problem involving first of all a woman and a doctor, and maybe also any person the woman wants to take advice from. No one else should intervene, and certainly not the state. Sorry, no offense meant.
00 ReplyNope. Real men and women know how to fuck. If you want to fuck haphazardly? That is upon you. Before any woman can say they don't want it, the man does indeed have a say. And it's being said and said again. If you don't like this arrangement? Don't expect the man to say fuck all, I don't want to pay.
00 Reply
+1 yblocking or limiting abortion really mostly effects those who engage in hookup culture or causal sex. since many couples have likely talked about if they desire children or not and what steps to take. however most areas still allow abortion in the extremes cases of rape/abuse, incest or medical issues. all blocking or limiting it does is reduce it from being used as an every day tool. by those who don't use other forms of birth control or safe sex methods.
00 ReplyPeople are too stupid to think of that as a cock block lol
12 Reply- 619 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIts only 8 states.
Please read up on the facts before revealing that you don't know what you're talking about.11 Reply
+1 yIt is the most anti-libertarian idea, and Christianity is a libertarian religion (in socieital and average western practices) when compared to other Abrahamic religions. I say Christianity because THE VAST majority of the Republicans ARE of that faith.
12 Reply- +1 y
Also the G. O. peepee&poopoo is not the party it once was. All it is pretty much that differs it from the Democratic Party or Independent Party is the requirement of that stupid Blue Lives Matter, NRA, or Honor Roll Student bumper sticker on their piece of shit Toyota truck or Honda minivan...
Trump and Musk both are phony Epstein neolibertarians. I will only vote for DeSantis if ever someone runs against Biden. - +1 y
Another thing too, most of those Republican men (+ their prostitute/provocative female enablers) are of the "redpill" type, meaning they're either lowkey GAY or cheaters...
one or the other
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv19GSXGjBs
www.reddit.com/.../
www.reddit.com/.../
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXbWZqFjf0w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdLsetGdENs
- 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yMajor cock block bruh!
At least in my state its still legal
11 Reply
+1 yLaws banning abortion don't do much to prevent abortions. They only server to push abortions into back alleys. This is what we learned before Roe.
21 Reply
+1 yI mean yess and no, itâs more devastating and terrible for the ladies but yes there are also going to be people who will never get the chance to date and hookup culture is gunna dwindle simply because if you get pregnant you either have that baby or become a felon and face a potential death penalty 😳
00 Reply- 5.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yAbortion isn't banned here, except pretty much in a few states. Each state sets their own rules. It's not a cock block, but it's not protecting lives as they claim either.
10 Reply LOL! WM--it's not going to deter anything. I don't think anyone was is going to look up state abortion policy when drunkenly getting busy on a Saturday night!
10 Reply
+1 yIf that were going to do it, we'd be more concerned about our OWN lack of options.
But the government didn't ban abortion- they banned THEMSELVES INTERFERING IN THE STATES making decisions on abortion.
00 Reply- 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNo not at all cause I'm always responsible when I have sex. But it's a stupid decision cause as soon as the baby boom happens and the goverment has to pay for all these kids all they'll do is raise our taxes and pass the buck to us which I feel is unfair cause I don't have any kids
00 Reply
+1 yhopefully in the long run it at the very least reduces the amount of std infections or whatever and also, I'm not active atm so it's ineffective to me, it probably would if I was clapping cheeks left and right tho
00 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 ySome women, especially in the backwards states, may decide to alter their behavior. On the flip-side, a lot more women may be cashing child support checks as well.
11 Reply- +1 y
When you get pregnant you will leave you man for child support, really?
+1 yI don't care about American woman so it doesn't bother me honestly. I've been traveling out the country for 12 years now and have seen the light.
00 ReplyAssuming you're not referring to the federal government banning abortion, because it hasn't, the individual states are creating their own policy, so there are options for those who choose abortion.
With that in mind, it really shouldn't matter...
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yNah, not really.
Its time to do feminists who used the "it takes two to make a baby" excuse to rob men of child support to use the "you should not have sex if you can't handle the consequences" and the classic "it does not affect you so you don'ty have a say" line to shut up men who complains about the ruling about abortions
00 Reply
+1 yEvery guy in the United States should get a vasectomy when he is 14 years old. Then, he can fuck girls at will without ever worrying about paying child support for the rest of his life.
00 Reply- 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIf they ever do we can have this conversation, but since all they have done is returned states rights to the states from federal overreach, there has not been a federal ban.
00 Reply I believe the answer is Yes and now more Women are going to hate Men in society because of that supreme court decision.
10 Reply
+1 yit is not a nationwide ban on abortion 🤦ââď¸ only super conservative states will have laws against it. I live in cali and nothing is changing here.
10 Reply12K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The government did not ban abortion. It only cancelled bad law, shifting authority over abortions to the states. Do I think it is a disincentive to casual sex? Yes, it is.
00 Reply
+1 yThe overturning of roe v wade was a direct violation of the first amendment. I'm Jewish. Jews don't believe that life begins at conception. Therefore the overturning of roe, was a direct violation of the first amendment (freedom of religion)
07 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
If we followed that logic Muslims would pass shariah law and would be cutting off thiefâs hands, whipping homosexuals in public, and killing anyone who disrespects god or Muhammad. Abortion is killing a baby whether you like it or not. Constitution is about freedom of expression and speech. Says both about surgically killing viable babies. Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about abortions. Biblically it was seen as a blessing to have children since most didnât survive to adulthood.
- +1 y
- +1 y
If it wasn't Christian, you'd see Jews and Muslims on the Supreme Court. You don't
- +1 y
Anyway, I'm done arguing this with you. This is why I don't like when people ask abortion questions
It leads to trolls, like yourself
Shame on you, QA
Not at all. I had a vesectomy many years ago and all my friends with benefits know it so they welcome my cum.
12 Reply- +1 y
@wittymilf Thank you for the Like
1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Not American, but it literally hasn't been banned. They just made a decision that others will be deciding that.
10 Reply- 579 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt is not about womens' rights. It is not about abuse victims. It is all about the risk people have now in having open sex. THAT is the whole reason for the itch in the anus that everybody is having about this ban.
00 Reply - 891 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yMaybe irresponsible sex and hookup culture has damaged society and taking a minute to consider the consequences is the first step is fixing it.
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yStop listing to leftist propaganda. Abortion is still legal in most of the USA, the places where it is now illegal it was already mostly unavailable.
10 Reply
+1 yNo because I could easily Fuck a Girl in the ass that would prevent Pregnancy 100% I wear condom she wears a condom and Even If pregnancy did occur Smoking MugRoot would Cause a miscarriage.
00 Reply
+1 y"Cock block" is not the proper term!!
Maybe irresponsible women will stop fucking any guy that looks at them without using some type of birth control.
Abortion on demand was just birth control of the last resort!!!
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yThe government did not ban abortion... It was never a constitutional right, they pushed it back to the states and let them decide. For as old as you are I find it shocking that you need to take a civics/government class..
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yNo not really. Women on the internet get paranoid about this stuff but IRL the bigger concern for a guy like me is women trying to get pregnant by me in order to âtrapâ me.
00 Reply3.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The government didn't decide to ban abortion. They decided to allow states to decide whether or not they want to.
12 Reply6.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I feel it's going to lead to women dying if it hasn't already.
00 Reply8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Nope. But Iâm anyhow interested in women who want to have a family.
00 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yNope. And the fact that so many women are combining about losing their right to murder just goes to show how much they needed to be reigned in.
02 Reply- +1 y
You have no balls so you donât have to worry about it any way đ¤ˇââď¸
Opinion Owner+1 yđ¤Łđ¤Łđ¤Ł
- 6.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 y1) it is not a ban on abortion
2) it is murder
3) Anyone that has an abortion will end up in Hell.
01 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yThe government didnât ban abortions.
If youâre going to criticize another countryâs laws and judicial system at least get your goddamn facts right.
00 Reply- 828 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yA pill a day keeps babies away
30 Reply I think it's stupid as hell
25 Reply- +1 y
It will cause more women to be chaste which will make a suitable relationship easier for men to find. Women should be thrilled about this considering a serious relationship is supposedly what most of u say u want
- +1 y
@Gangactivities911 this one probably enjoys the casual environment.
- +1 y
@jestergent yeah itâs funny women are the ones who want a relationship but any attempt to get them to close their legs and wait for the right guy is met with fierce backlash. Itâs almost as if women secretly want to be whores but donât want to be responsible for anything negative that comes from it. Odd
- +1 y
@Gangactivities911 wiw you guys really like control of your women huh đđ if women wanted a man who kept his dick in his pants the world would be dead by now. Bye duckers đđđđź
+1 yRead the law, lately? It is not in the Constitution. It can go to Congress to pass the law. Or 34 of the 50 states can push Congress to pass an Amendment.
10 Reply- 443 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yOh, brace yourself. Affirmative Action is next.
06 Reply- +1 y
@love_conquers_lust that is what I am afraid of
- +1 y
- +1 y
@love_conquers_lust, Yes there was a lot of pain and heartache people had to go through to end segregation, I also believe that all lives don't matter until #blacklivesmatter. I was afraid of affirmative action would be the next target the day I saw the overturn of Roe V Wade overturned.
- +1 y
@Tommy789 If people are born equal, then we donât need Affirmative Action. It has nothing to do with ending segregation. It has everything to do with taking taxpayer money and distributing it to people not based in income, but race and gender.
Iâm so embittered by it that DEI is simply code for we wonât hire you until we meet our quotas. Seriously, it is actual, GENUINE, segregation and oppression of poor white males. I cannot believe Democrats ignored this. There are honest to God newspaper articles written by Vox, Vice, all these liberal mother fuckers who say in order to make things equal we have to discriminate unfairly against White males. This party was notorious for helping White males for centuries. Then, they just dropped them after WW2. As far as Iâm concerned, they brought this on themselves. You donât do that to people and DARE to call yourselves the party of the people. Nor do you DARE to accuse THEM of being racist when your party supports OVERT RACIST policies. They didnât learn their lesson before the Civil War. They still havenât learned anything after the last few elections. - +1 y
@Tommy789 Enough said about what? See, thatâs the major problem with Democrats. You are spewing so many toxic fumes you canât even think straight. Sarcasm may be the highest form of intelligence, but itâs also the lowest form of wit. Itâs a pussyâs tool for those who are too scared to say what they mean. It also poisons the brain like an addictive drug in recurrent doses.
Because of my conservative core, I worked hard to learn from my left wing schooling. I was taught to be tolerant of others and to stand up for what was right. When I learned what Democrats were truly doing and how they decided that poor White men werenât âsexyâ enough for them because there was no money in it, thatâs when I realized the truth about them. I donât like hicks, rednecks, hillbillies, good oleâ boys, trailer parks, or supremacistsâŚbut I TOLERATE them. Just like I was taught. And to treat them as equals regardless. Thatâs why itâs YOU who are the fucked up ones. Itâs YOU who canât uphold your own message. Itâs YOU who are intolerant. I donât like either party, either. But I turned my back on Democrats a while ago when I learned they turned their back on people who needed their help.
- Show More (31)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News