What do you think of this video?

Question

MJ239 · Accepted Answer

He's telling the truth and being called out for it as is typical for the vast majority of western media. More than likely some black hat groups like clowns in america, or a rogue mil group who sabotaged the pipeline. This was done to the Russians before in the 1980s. Keep in mind it cost almost $10 bn to build and was set to make $250 Bn in natural gas. The Russians didn't attack themselves. It was also convenient because the Germans wouldve came to negotiate with russia for natural gas, but now that Joe and Ukraine got their way, Europe will be without heat.

NATO doesn't want to go to war, but Poland wants to. Plus they just launched the Belgorad submarine, which is basically loaded with 6 Poseidon torpedos. Each capable of producing 1 kiloton, not much but its enough to detonate and cause underwater 1,500-2,000 ft radioactive tidal wave against our coasts. The Russian military is only withdrawing because they are legitimately threatening an atomic strike. We were called the "united Satanists of america."

The Deep state, illuminati, whatever name those drifter prick motherfuckers go by now will absolutely by any means necessary defend Ukraine, illegal bio labs, human trafficking, etc... at all costs, even if it means destroying the entire planet. Its only a matter of time before the decades, of evil we have caused and our allies is finally exposed. Plus consider how Snowden was just granted citizenship, so you know he probably shared information that he wasn't supposed to, because he stole a lot more than what he thought he grabbed working as a clown agent in order to cripple data gathering so the deep state wouldn't get caught.

Telekinetic-Potato · Accepted Answer

Lmao, this reminds me of those videos of CNN cutting out as soon as people start doing this.

Someone told me that we were doing "training" by the "exact" spot where the explosion happened.

I think it makes sense we did it, I don't really see a reason to think we didn't do it. It's a total USA move to just be like "yeaaa, you're not gonna be able to stop us from blowing up this thing we don't like so, say goodbye to this thing we don't like"

There's just stuff about it that makes it hard for me to fully wrap my head around the idea of the us doing it. (like why would helicopters be involved, why isn't the EU blaming us or performing a big investigation, how precisely does that help us who else would have done it and why?) But Biden said we were going to do it seemingly by accident so there's that too.

Lliam · Answer

I think he is right. I've read and listened to really good reporting on Ukraine, Nordstream, and other international events.

It's interesting that no other points of view are allowed on mainstream media. Even social media giants censor information that goes contrary to the desired narrative. The purpose is to tell people what to think, not give them information with which they can develop informed opinions. Social engineering has been perfected.

Americans and their allies are being fed non-stop, coordinated propaganda. And unthinking dupes fall for it.

What country had the motive and means to blow up that pipeline? Far out in front of anyone else is the USA.

Exterminatore · Answer

Don’t know enough about the subject to speak intelligently about it, I’ll just simply say I would not at all be surprised to find this to be true given the current administrations stance on going green and that the left wing media is and has been clearly reporting stories, altering them, and not reporting others in order to influence people away from conservatism. So I wouldn’t be shocked to learn this guy is correct just based on the stance of the interviewer.

TheSpaceGnome · Answer

I think commercial news stations are fake news.

OddBeMe · Answer

Says “spits facts” but he just spat an opinion.

I mean I still dont see the upside of the US pissing off Europe. Nor has the US done something like this in the last 20 years.

Russia on the other hand kills defectors, invades countries on false pretenses, etc…but I’m open to investogating. Not spitting in Sachs’ face. He can have an opinion.

AviatorTom · Answer

It's controversial and Bloomberg probably got excellent ratings, and the Columbia professor got some publicity.

RealMarek · Answer

I think our reporters know what the elite-approved narrative is supposed to be and freak out whenever anyone expresses different ideas, no matter how reasonable.

Quigly · Answer

Many saying Russia wouldn't blow up their own pipeline clearly don't know Putin. He would do it just to blame the U. S.

888theGreat · Answer

He told the truth and liberal media didn't want the truth told

KrakenAttackin · Answer

The U. S. could certainly be involved but this would not have been done with helicopters.

joeldalton · Answer

Pretty much captured it 100%

pers0n · Answer

Funny

What do you think of this video?

Superb Opinion

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said