In the face of these baseless political charges, does President Trump have your unwavering support?

[Anonymous]

Yes

No

[exitseven]

Yes, what the democrats are doing is election interference. It has nothing to do with a crime and it has nothing to do with justice. The democrats know they cannot win without cheating. Trump is an even better position to win in 2024 than he was in 2020. He has vowed to make draining the swamp a priority so their backs are against the wall. It looks like the multiple indictments have fallen flat and have not fooled anyone. I am afraid that as time goes on the only move they will have left is to take Trump out

[strateguy632]

by now they should each withdraw the accusations if they dont want him to look like an innocent martyr.

[exitseven]

@strateguy632 It is way too late for that. You know it id the end of the line when The Onion starts poking fun at you.

[Dargil]

So far, yes. The indictments are part of Spectre's plan to silence him. If he were really convicted of a real felony such as defrauding is business clients or all the influence peddling Biden has done, maybe not. I do wish he would drop the DeSantis name calling. If he starts on Ramaswamy, my support will waver.

[Anonymous]

Yes. The Democrats are truly an embarrassment to America. They install a criminal with dementia, so now their only choice is to cheat and get rid of Trump.

[John_Doesnt]

How mentally retarded would you have to be to still support him at this point? He's been charged 3 separate times now. No other president has been indicted for federal crimes. He's a crook and needs to be prevented from going anywhere near the White House.

[strateguy632]

learn legal terms, the accuser writes indictment not the judge. charged does not mean guilt only accused the volume of accusations indicated the political motivation.
about calling anyone crook, can you prove you are not a crook? where is the receipt for the phone in your hand? if yes, does the credit card number on it match ONLY your credit card etc.

[John_Doesnt]

@strateguy632 I guess you have a very special form of retardation for still supporting him.

[Asker]

Yeah, all by Democrats.

[lightbulb27]

Nobody has my unwavering support. But in the face of unwaivering attacks ill consider the best way to put the left in its place… which frankly is a dream at this point

[goaded]

Why do you think the DoJ doing its job (via a special counsel who is immune from interference from the department) is "unwaivering attacks"? If no crimes had been committed, there would be no indictments. Hundreds of people have already been convicted for their actions on Jan 6, some of them for seditious conspiracy; what makes Trump immune from the consequences of his actions that led directly to that?

[lightbulb27]

@goaded because they have a mission to go after him, which is partly their job and partly political. The goal is to sufficeintly destroy him, using any and all means, so he is ineffective. It doesn't matter if it's true. He's been attacked since day way with what, I have to assume you now see, as false Russia BS. If they throw enough crap at him, he'll slip up and he likely has. Some of it, likely true.
But I don't spend my life dwelling on stuff I cannot influence. I get to vote in a primary and for a president. I'll make my decisions based upon whom I think can do the best job. I cannot vote for Harris/Biden because I don't agree with much if anything they say or do. Most of what Trump said and was doing, I agree with. That said, I never liked the guy and clearly... they understand the weakness of his personality/disorder.

he's not a nice guy, but the USA is a screwball mess. Honestly, I don't think anyone can fix it, let alone Trump. Were screwed and you should be biting your nails...

[goaded]

"It doesn't matter if it's true" Yes, it does. It definitely does, and it's ensured by multiple juries of citizens being involved in the decision making process whether to indict.

Russia did interfere on his behalf, that's a proven fact. Republicans (McConnell) refused to announce that fact before the 2016 election. Trump welcomed the help from Russia, rather than rejecting it, as he should have. Trump was documented obstructing justice in the Mueller report something like 10 times. Why obstruct an investigation that wasn't going to find any wrong-doing?

[lightbulb27]

@goaded I don't see the point in rehashing any of this, not worth my energy.
Bottom line, if I have to choose been trump and Biden, I know my choice because I agree with what he was doing and says, mostly. Most of politics is a mud slinging process in US at this point.
I may choose someone other than Trump on the right, tbd.
What does it mean that Biden won't even show up to debate? it's really sad our state of affairs, we have a puppet.
Biden and Harris have no business being in charge imho.

[goaded]

Who did Trump debate in 2020?

[lightbulb27]

@goaded Biden?

[goaded]

What makes you think Biden won't do presidential debates?

[DryGermanGuy]

The orange gorilla needs to burn in the eternal hellfire of political damnation. 🤬

[strateguy632]

not innocent until prove guilty?

[goaded]

@strateguy632 That presumption is only necessary in court. Saying he's guilty could be seen as defamation, but only if it turns out he's not. He is.

[JoeMichael67]

No, the MAGA movement needs to end, it's turning people into cult members. Have you ever talked to a hardcore Trump supporter? They honestly believe he was sent by God.

[strateguy632]

only the good parts of cult characteristics not the harmful waco parts. similarly the partial fascists, only harmful characteristics are worthy to oppose, like limiting speech for example p. c. supporters have the bad parts of fascist.

[goaded]

"baseless"? Nope. "political"? Nope. Guilty? Yes.

[goaded]

"The First Amendment protects Donald Trump if he simply makes knowingly false statements about election fraud."

"The First Amendment does not protect Donald Trump if he corruptly attempts to persuade, coerce or direct others to ACT on his knowingly false beliefs."

[strateguy632]

you sound like a certified judge. sarcasm.

[goaded]

@strateguy632 IANAL, but I can read. The indictment itself says:

"The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the
election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome -determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means , such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. Indeed, in many cases , the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful."

It goes on to say "Shortly after election day , the Defendant also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results. In so doing , the Defendant perpetrated three criminal conspiracies..."

If I go up to someone and tell them to give me their wallet because I've got a gun in my pocket, am I robbing them, or simply using my right to free speech?

[AngryCarl2]

I don't have a dog in this fight but because Trump and his co-conspirators committed their crimes in the broad light of day the allegations are both well-founded and easily proveable.

[msc545]

Sure, if agrees to go to prison peacefully when he is convicted and sentenced.

[Anonymous]

One rich man against a corrupt organisation. Sounds like a movie setting. Batman maybe.

[Meropatrick]

I support him all the way

[jimmy2]

It's funny Dems do it then charge Trump

[goaded]

Do what, exactly?

[normandi]

Never... he is delusional all along

[BarryLiverstone]

Nope