What are your thoughts on this? She just destroyed her legal career! I wonder how many members of her family were threatened with death for her to do this?
8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It seems to me that what happened here is a classic case of a politically motivated prosecutor massively overcharging a defendant to get them to roll on the real target, Trump. It's very suspicious that the plea deal results in only probation and requires testimony, which puts a perjury trap in play that would result in jail time for Powell.
17 Reply- +1 y
@OddBeMe: I know you’re too dense to understand anything, which is why leftist propaganda appeals to you, but keep in mind Powell is 68, doesn’t have unlimited money and would be facing a jury in a locality that is 75% or more Democrats. Fighting the trumped-up charges would have cost a lot of time and money, and the jury would have been filled with Democratic Party totalitarians. So she took the easy path out by getting probation.
But ask yourself this- if you’re going to trumpet a guilty plea, why didn’t the prosecutor take the case to trial? Why give Powell probation if indeed she were guilty of the crimes she was charged with? It’s dishonest on your part to trumpet a guilty plea to charges that were tiny compared to what she was charged with. So was the prosecutor unethical in overcharging her in the first place? Or why give her such a plea deal if she had actually done what she was accused of?
Suborning perjury, should it occur, is a crime on the part of a prosecutor and grounds for disbarment. - +1 y
@OddBeMe: Nope, that’s not the only way someone could „know something“. But there’s also the possibility it’s just for optics for idiots like you and there won’t be any testimony.
You’re very trusting of the prosecutor- ask yourself why the prosecutor accepted a plea to no felonies. If the prosecutor had a case, why didn’t she want to present it in court? The plea deal was therefore just about saving face for the prosecutor. Furthermore, Powell took the deal because she didn’t want to bankrupt herself fighting the charges.
You excuse criminal behavior by leftists all the time, including by your Dear Leader for illegally opening the border and engaging in human trafficking.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yWhat makes me wonder, how many women Trump disrespected them not too good?
11 Reply- +1 y
Thanks for MHO :)
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
4Opinion
18.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Uhh, Syd broke the law, she made a deal with prosecutors (i bet) against another criminal.
You really need to stop watching this guy. It’d be fine if you weren’t posting his crap here.
I watch shit tubers to feel better about myself. Lol
137 Reply- +1 y
@Juxtapose
HE HIRED SYDNEY YOU DUMB FUCK - +1 y
@Avicenna “Sidney Powell, who advised Trump during the final frantic weeks of his bid to remain in power despite losing the election…”
Whatever she did was illegal. I’m not a prosecutor.
www.politico.com/.../sidney-powell-attorney-who-aided-trumps-bid-to-subvert-election-pleads-guilty-00122444 - +1 y
Odd, how do you know that whatever Powell did was illegal? If what she did was so bad, why let her practically walk with mere probation? Can you even tell us what crime (s) she was alleged to have committed? If you can't do that, it proves you don't understand the case.
Not only has Powell said that she never was Trump's lawyer, ask yourself why she hasn't even attempted to invoke attorney-client privilege?
And we all know how unreliable leftist media propagandists are, as their verbatim re-broadcast of Hamas lies amply shows. - +1 y
@Avicenna “How do I know what Sydney Powell did was illegal?” She was charged and took a plea deal admitting her guilt to the illegality moron.
And attorney client doesn’t matter because they have her dead to rights on ACTUAL election fraud. She’s flipping on trump and violating the privilege because she’s gonna lose her license anyway. - +1 y
@Juxtapose Politico is an accredited pretty centered news agency. Often cited by other news agencies. And the stories I’ve seen say alleged.
Unlike your shit YouTubers who have no ethics at all. - +1 y
Odd, Powell did not plead guilty to „election fraud“. Can you cite exactly what she did plead guilty to? And merely being charged doesn’t make someone guilty. Furthermore, how can you say she was guilty of what she was charged with when the prosecutor didn’t want to take ANY of the charges to trial to attempt to convict her?
As for attorney-client, you obviously don’t know what it is. If she was his lawyer, she’d have claimed it. But she didn’t. And the plea deal allows her to keep her law license, which is one the major reasons why she took the plea deal- rather than being tied up in court and paying attorney fees, she can still practice law.
No wonder you believe and spread leftist propaganda. You’re simply too stupid to think critically and apply basic concepts a college-educated person should be able to. - +1 y
Do you understand the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony? Powell is even still able to practice law. What does that tell you? And, again, keep in mind the fact that a defendant can be ruined financially by the cost of a trial even if innocent.
She was charged with seven felonies yet the prosecutor didn’t want to take the case to court. Either the prosecutor coerced a guilty plea or she has too weak a case to even go to court with a rabid Democratic jury pool. - +1 y
And those misdemeanors do not constitute „election fraud“. If you have trouble understanding that (and since you’re a leftist you don’t know what election fraud is), ask yourself if someone committing „election fraud“ would still be allowed to practice law after pleading guilty. They wouldn’t. So you’re wrong.
- +1 y
Read this, Odd (no doubt you still won’t get it):
www.justice.gov/usao-nh/page/file/1328371/download - +1 y
She wasn’t hired by Trump? Trump disagrees.
https://imgur.com/a/MczIDJj - +1 y
@Avicenna in his tweet? He made it clear he hired her.
https://imgur.com/a/MczIDJj
- 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHaha right... her legal "career."
She'll make more on the book deal and lecture circuit.
110 Reply- +1 y
Unfort true. I don’t understand why people are letting Trump’s advisors off the hook when they could've came forward before the election about his craziness.
They waited until he was president to write their books for more money. Ie, his sister Mary Trump, who’s a left wing darling now. Yuk. - +1 y
@OddBeMe: What’s your explanation for the prosecutor charging her with seven felonies and then making a plea deal that included no felonies and just probation? It’s unethical to overcharge a defendant or bring charges you can’t prove in court. And an unethical prosecutor should not be allowed to run roughshod over people and violate their rights.
You also assume she „flips on Trump“. She may not have anything that would help this prosecutor.
You’re very naive, Odd. - +1 y
@OddBeMe: So which very unethical action has the prosecutor engaged in: overcharging over a dozen people to coerce guilty pleas or letting people get away with multiple felonies? Don't try to avoid that reality. I understand that you are a typical leftist who believes that the ends justify the means, but prosecutorial misconduct is seriously illegal.
- +1 y
@OddBeMe: That's funny- you earlier claimed that YOU knew what the prosecutors were doing. But despite that and despite being asked multiple times, you cannot explain how multiple defendants have been charged with lots of felonies, yet the prosecutor was more than happy to make lots of felonies go away rather than to take the cases to trial. I am simply using common sense and my knowledge of legal ethics to interpret the prosecutor's actions. If these many felonies were actually committed, why didn't the prosecutor take the defendants to trial and get them convicted on all charges?
But normal people are bothered by prosecutorial misconduct. You, however, are not.
- 1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ySomething is fishy here. Am I led to believe she did not investigate the case before taking it and considering the consequences?
How much are the Dems paying her?14 Reply- +1 y
Interesting. I thought she was Trump’s attorney. Along with Gulianni. Why are they going after her and not Gulianni?
- +1 y
We know they don’t. The main stream media is nothing but propaganda.
I haven’t followed this story closely. Perhaps I will pay closer attention now.
- 3.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think she's just weak. She couldn't take the heat.
10 Reply
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
Is Trump is a traitor?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions