I read somewhere an artist put a project together and selected a girl from each age 6 to 16, from 20 different countries and lined them all up naked in their country groups on display as a museum exhibition. Is this wrong, or just interesting art?
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
3Opinion
WRONG! Good-for-nothing dementia Douche bags like that who have no one to grieve their eventual death completely take art out of context and twist and rig the definition to fit their satanic narrative. DISPARAGE. Art IS objective and any who says this is fine will inevitably meet an ultimate demise just like Mr. Napoleon did.
daBiggest... what the hell are you babbling about?
and who is "Mr. Napoleon"?
@HighlyQuestionable Napoleon? The guy who became Emperor of Crance and was a great general for his army?
*France
Ok, but what does Napoleon have to do with this "Art" exhibition?
Your original statement appears to be threatening unnamed individuals with Calomel (Mercury Chloride) poisoning. (attention moderators)
@HighlyQuestionable just a comparison. Not that deep partner. Let’s backpedal a few steps before someone crosses a line they can’t come back from.
Art is kinda funny. Pretty much anything can be art. But no, it's not wrong. I don't see how that can hurt anything.
Would u have gone to the exhibition
No. It wouldn't interest me. It honestly sounds boring.
I have never heard about it. I don't think underage children should be naked and on display for all to see.