Are all these former trump staffers who are criticizing him just trying to save there faces after working for him?

[Anonymous]

Yes

No

[Anonymous]

When we talk about these former Trump staffers, some folks out there might be thinking, "Are they just trying to save face after working for him?" It's a valid question, no doubt.

But here's where it gets interesting. Among these former staffers, there are voices raising concerns about Trump's relationship with Putin. Now, that's not just about saving face; it's about a genuine concern that Trump might have been influenced by Putin during his presidency.

We've got the evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election, and we've got Trump's behavior towards Putin that raised eyebrows. So, when these former insiders speak out, they might be saying, "Look, we saw some things during our time in the administration, and we think it's crucial to address these issues."

So, it's not just a one-sided story of saving face; it's a multi-dimensional discussion that includes the concern that Trump might have been a puppet of Putin. It's a complex web of motivations and perspectives, and it's fascinating to dive into.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/y-Q5T7kFjkM

[MikeFrench]

Yes, but when the shit hits the fan, they will shift back.

[Anonymous]

Funny they democrats did everything possible ridiculous and absurd to TRY to get him for something , ANYTHING, and still can’t.. election interference to the max! So much for nothing and still can’t but you will have the propaganda consumers repeating how he’s such a “con” and how he’s “guilty” of everything they’ve TRIED to indict with with but yet has not once been found guilty but here you have the ignorant democratic propaganda consumers stating as if it’s fact because they READ it somewhere in their propaganda 🤡🤡🥴 ridiculous. Never seen so much ignorance.

[goaded]

Are investigations into the current president "election interference"? How about the investigations into Clinton, were they "election interference"? At least the investigations into Trump have some evidence behind them.

[Avicenna]

@goaded: Ony if you believe leftist propaganda (which of course leftist Europeans only believe). After the Russia Hoax, the false claims that Hunter Biden's laptop was "Russian disinformation", the massive attempts at illegal censorship, false claims of "insurrection", and so much more (including soft coups against a sitting President). leftists have been exposed as propagandists and are not credible. So what a leftist propagandist deems "evidence" is at best, badly distorted and part of political persecution. At it's worst, claims of "evidence" from leftists are pure lies.

As for your straw man on your beloved sodomist Bill Clinton, lying to a grand jury and the Whitewater scandal were genuine evidence.

[goaded]

@Avicenna I was talking about Hillary before the 2016 election. Benghazi x 10, just to bring her numbers down. Clinton should never have been impeached for lying about his sex life, and they never proved anything about Whitewater, but in hindsight, I think all Democrats should have convicted to convict, giving you nearly 6-10 years of President Gore, possibly no 9/11 or Afghan war, certainly no Iraq war, and no Bush tax cuts to explode the deficit when the economy was doing well.

All the rest of your list are lies.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded you have a Ukrainian flag that alone screams PROPAGANDA consumer.

[goaded]

Says the person who can't face the fact that Trump had been indicted by four or five gand juries of citizens for 91 separate crimes.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded the FACT you have a ridiculous flag of a country that has been bombing it's own people for more than 9 years proves you're a propaganda consumer. 🤯🥴🤡

[goaded]

Didn't you notice that nearly two years ago Russia escalated from supporting a civil war and annexing Crimea to a full-blown invasion of a democratic state? I'm well aware of the recent history of the country and its attempts to get out from under the thumb of Russia.

Meantime, you pretend to be unaware of what's happening with Trump and all the evidence against him in the trials he's trying desparately to delay, in order to spread propaganda.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded full blown propaganda consumer AND spreader 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤦‍♀️ cringe 🤯😖🤢🤮

[goaded]

Wow.

[Anonymous]

Everyone knows Trump has been a conman for decades, and it is well documented.

[RingOfFire]

.

[goaded]

I'm sure the House, with the power of the purse, is doing everything it can to ameliorate the situation.

[goaded]

"... we do have good economic news. But, the media doesn't want to cover it. [Biden] is correct on that. He shouldn't just say, you're looking at the wrong thing. They need to communicate this better.

But we've got revised third quarter GDP growth up to 4.9 percent. Unheard of. Consumer confidence went up to 14 percent. Largest jump in a decade. Inflation is running at an annualized rate below Powell's target, which is why he's talking about a rate cut. Personal income is up. Grocery and energy prices down last month.

And the Quinnipiac poll, this part of it is really important. They did a forward looking question. What you think 2024 is going to be like, 48 percent said the economy is going to be better, and 62 percent think that they are going to be better off in the next year. When is the election? November 2024. Democrats make your case. There is a case to be made. "

[Snakeyes7]

Absolutely and they are cowards.

Instead of standing their ground for something they believe in, they turn their tail and ran.

[gorydetails]

They know the idiots will buy their books.