Is Trump losing votes from women and other groups because of his choice for a narrow minded extreme rightist VP choice as JD Vance?

[Anonymous]

[Skinhead-1979]

No, Trump has largely gathered a 'Cult' around him and his followers will keep worshipping him no matter what.

I am absolutely shocked to see the political nonsense going on in the US, and the analogies being used; not that everything is so great Europe... but my god, the sheer level of stupidity and ignorance is staggering.

[Avicenna]

The opinions of independent voters is what actually matters. If Vance were the extremist the far-left Democrats are propagandizing that he is, he wouldn't have gotten elected Senator in Ohio.

But Democrats propagandizing about Vance is just them trying to distract us from the totalitarian, undemocratic nature of a Democratic Party plutocracy which refuses to listen to the will of the voters.

[Anonymous]

No, he's losing women and most young people because he killed the national right to abortion and is the focal point of authority for project 2025 which has the stated goal of making him dictator

[Avicenna]

Someone with your mindset would never vote for any Republican

[Opinion Owner]

I would have had they picked a better candidate.

[SugarSugarplum]

Not me. JD Vance is kind of a folk hero to most women I know.

[Danny_dan92]

Luckily for you. He didn’t pick an actual smart woman. Like say Candace Owens, just to name an example of a smart woman.




Because had he done so, and Biden didn’t in fact drop out.




Candace would’ve made Kamala look stupid. And prove that appointing people based on identity politics, is a terrible idea.

[Asker]

The goal is to get elected. Having a VP choice that is extreme only loses votes instead of gain them. Plus women do not want somebody like that to be president. Does not matter Trump will lose and this choice just lost more votes

[Danny_dan92]

How is he extreme?

[Asker]

You don't know what far right means? He is that.

[Danny_dan92]

Explain it to me

[exitseven]

I think that maybe some extreme liberal females do not like him but they were never going to vote for Trump anyway. You cannot please everybody. At least with the Trump ticket you know what you are getting. A safer America, a stronger economy and lower taxes. I imaging the prospect of WW3 will be much greater with Kamala Harris as president.

[KostasKouvalis]

I certainly think taking JD Vance will hurt his chances. The majority of everyday Conservatives don't seem to like him.

[Asker]

That is what I have read to

[Anonymous]

don't matter

the Republicans will lose more votes if they stop abiding by their principles and instead just start pandering for votes

JD Vance is still a far better option than Kamala Harris

so is Ron Desantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, Nikki Haley and Tulsi Gabbard

heck even Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Nancy Pelosi, Hilary Clinton are better options than Kamala Harris

[Twalli]

He picked Vance expecting his opponent to be Joe Biden. Vance was a perfect pick when Biden was his opponent. The funny thing us that (if she was willing) he could have picked Nikki Haley and still win against Harris. Now it's dicey for him. If he agrees to debate Harris, he'd have essentially nailed his coffin shut.

[OhLongJohnsoning]

Right now, it's the fight between men and women. We saw this in 2016. Republicans continue to only nominate men, while dems are now on their second woman as a choice. Republicans kept saying "of course we'd nominate a woman"

Well, you had your chance, once again, and here we are, again, with trump, A MAN

[Kaneki05]

Oh for sure.
I'd imagine Trumps women supporters was already lower that of men, and this will only make it less.
And data shows women tend to vote more than men so it's a major disadvantage.

[Anonymous]

Trump is already the worst human being on the planet. So who cares if the VP he chooses is also really horrible? It made no difference who he picked.

[Dargil]

The Childless, white wine drinking cat women weren't going to vote for him anyway. They just want government largesse and to murder infants. They'll have to turn up the sex so their husbands and boy friends vote for Kamala The Klown.

[Anonymous]

Only from dumb women. The fact that strong moral values are considered "narrow minded extreme rightist" by so many today is exactly why we need someone like Vance more than ever

[KostasKouvalis]

I agree with you, but Vance is a joke.

[Opinion Owner]

@KostasKouvalis Why is he a joke?

[KostasKouvalis]

He's a hillbilly simpleton with almost no experience and he hasn't even done anything for his state

[Opinion Owner]

@KostasKouvalis A hillbilly simpleton? Hmm, he definitely does not come off as either of those things to me. He's intelligent, articulate, and likeable, and I like his political views.

[KostasKouvalis]

He doesn't have a big mouth and isn't quick witted like Cruz or Rubio

[Opinion Owner]

@KostasKouvalis Not having a big mouth is a strength, not a weakness. And I disagree that he's not quick witted. I've seen him in some interviews where the interviewer was clearly liberal and trying to trip him up and get him to say things they could use against him later, and he kept his cool, gave intelligent answers and left the interviewers frustrated. That's what we need more than a big mouth like Trump.

[ProbablyClueless]

I don't know anything about the man. I haven't had the time to research him yet.

[MikeyObrien]

I don't know if Vance is considered extreme right. But it actually doesn't matter who the VP is. Anyone voting for him is voting for Trump not Vance.

[DrPepper12]

Yes. he's kryptonite to moderate suburban women and has more baggage than an airport lost n found

[Anonymous]

No. Women who don't have kids should be pitied and prayed for

[gorydetails]

So you’d vote for camela? Lol.