Trump keeps winning! Are you happy?

[Juxtapose]

[Billlewis]

The protected class, permanent Washington, also known as the 'deep state', the tech oligarchs and of course, the single greatest enemy we've ever faced as a nation, the corporate media, are lined up to crush what's left of our once vibrant society, and in the most evil, cynical manner possible -- by stoking the flames of jealousy, bitterness and racial turmoil.

[goaded]

What happens now? The court looks at the evidence, the descriptions of what Trump did, in order to decide what was done by President Trump and what was done by Candidate Trump.

Spelled out. Piece by piece.

[PreferNot2Say]

And Trump's support grows even more, due to pathetically desperate demokkkrat politicians 😂

[goaded]

@PreferNot2Say Well, what's really happened is that a new grand jury was shown only evidence that had nothing to do with Trump's presidential authority and decided that he probably did commit the exact same crimes.

Are you sad?

[PreferNot2Say]

@goaded
Sad😂 Not one bit sad. You dumb fucks have been hanging onto the pathetic hope of "we got Trump this time", to only be let down every single time. You'd think you'd learn by now. Hell even a retarded blind dog eventually stops running into the same brick wall, but not you in red liberals😂.

You probably still believe that Russian Collusion is real or maybe "quid pro quo" (which isn't illegal in ANY context) is still illegal. Maybe the "J6 insurrection" (which video has debunked) is real, etc.

You people possess absolutely ZERO critical thinking skills or you'd see the pattern of desperation that your demokkkrats have been in since 2016 when hillary was legitimately embarrassed on the world's stage.

There's more evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election than there is of humans effecting climate change and yet you still believe that humans are causing climate change. Just because you refuse to acknowledge facts, doesn't make them less factual, princess.

Keep hanging onto that "we'll get Trump" hope, too only be let down time after time.

Tell me something, what are your parents pet names for each other, bro and sis? Bless your poor little inbred heart😂😂😂😂😂

[goaded]

@PreferNot2Say You really have a bad case of projection going on there.

[PreferNot2Say]

@goaded What exactly am I projecting, princess. Please be very detailed. I'll wait...

[goaded]

@PreferNot2Say "Just because you refuse to acknowledge facts, doesn't make them less factual, princess." "What exactly am I projecting" Well, that's it in a nutshell.

You're sure that Russia didn't work on Trump's behalf despite all the indictments and obstruction of the investigation. You're too dumb to understand that quid pro quo is literally what makes a bribe a bribe. You ignore the evidence of your own eyes when it comes to the insurrection (still the opinion of the courts, by the way), not to mention the evidence that came out since and the fact that Trump is under renewed indictment for the same four crimes he was charged with before the SCOTUS weighed in to protect him. Global warming is real and the cause has been known for well over a century. There's evidence of maybe dozens of cases of voter fraud in 2020, they were mostly by Republicans, and they had no way to affect the eventual outcome.

Six grand juries have decided that Trump should stand trial for all those crimes, delaying the inevitable isn't "winning".

[PreferNot2Say]

@goaded Yes I'm sure Russia didn't work on Trump's behalf. Do you know why? There were seventeen STAUNCH HRC supporters that investigated it for over two years and they said there wasn't evidence of Trump colluding with Russia. They couldn't even find enough so they could spin a lie out of it.
But you know what did come out during that investigation? Ukraine admitted to colluding with HRC in an attempt to win the election. Look it up princess.
Six grand juries, blah blah blah. Just cuz corruption has infiltrated our entire system, doesn't make those six grand juries legit.
Do you not have any critical thinking skills or do you just believe everything that pleases your ears?
Grow tf up and do better. Stop reading JUST liberal sources. They've been lying to you for the better part of forty years. It has become so blatantly obvious in the last eight years and you still can't see it. Which means you actually don't have any critical thinking skills. Smfh

[goaded]

@PreferNot2Say I read sources that I've found never lied to me. That excludes many, if not most, right wing sources. I've noticed that people accusing me of not having "critical thinking skills" generally spout bullshit like "seventeen STAUNCH HRC supporters" (Mueller's a registered Republican) and ignore the findings of the investigation, which showed many cases of obstruction, leading to criminal convictions in several cases. Cases that Trump pardoned, because they were protecting him.

[PreferNot2Say]

@goaded Then provide the "sources" that you claim never lied to you. Also provide "right-wing" sources that you claim lied to you and last but not least, provide credible proof of Mueller ever being a registered Republican😂.
Don't do your typical liberal deflection and for once provide credible proof princess. If you're incapable, which you will be cuz your claims don't exist, don't bother answering. Who else has accused you of not having critical thinking skills and uses the term seventeen STAUNCH HRC supporters? You make nothing but vague claims. Be a man for once and pony up some credible proof.

[PreferNot2Say]

@goaded Here you go princess:

search.brave.com/search

Liberals Sources Lied on Russia

Based on the provided search results, the following liberal media sources are implicated in reporting false or flawed information about Russia collusion:

The New York Times: The search results mention a story published by the Times about a supposed secret Russian communication link, which was later debunked. Additionally, the FBI documents cited in the search results indicate that anonymous sources, including Christopher Steele, provided uncorroborated or debunked information about Trump’s alleged ties to Russia.

BuzzFeed: The search results mention the publication of the Steele dossier by BuzzFeed in January 2017, which contained salacious and unverified allegations about Trump’s relationship with Russia. The dossier was financed by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

CNN: Although not explicitly mentioned in the search results, CNN was a prominent outlet that reported extensively on Russia collusion during the Trump presidency. In 2017, CNN retracted a story about a supposed Trump-Russia connection after it was found to be based on false information.

It’s essential to note that these outlets, like all media sources, strive to report accurate information. However, in this case, the search results suggest that some liberal media sources may have relied on flawed or unverified sources, including anonymous sources and the Steele dossier, which ultimately contributed to the perpetuation of false narratives about Russia collusion.

[goaded]

@PreferNot2Say Do you understand the concept of a "lie"? It means telling someone something you know to be untrue, or recklessly don't care if it is. None of your examples (one of which you admit didn't even crop up in your search results) are examples of lying. Also, retracting a story is a good indication that they weren't intentionally misinforming you.

However, Fox News who had to pay out nearly $800 million for their lies about Dominion voting systems. Newsmax, afaik, is still in court for the same. Now *that's* a false narrative!

Trump clearly knew he lost the 2020 election and lied about it for months, leading to the attack on the Capitol.

Anyone claiming that the Steele dossier was the reason for the Mueller investigation, or that it found no contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia is lying, too.

Trump's been re-indicted by a different grand jury on the exact same charges, relying only on evidence that isn't affected by the SCOTUS decision. While there can't be a trial before the election, more evidence will probably be released on September 26th.

[Juxtapose]

"They made him more relevant,” Biase said of Trump. “That’s why he’s surging in the polls. You know, it’s a perversion of justice.”

To be honest with you, I think the case is nonsense,” he added. "Every real estate person in New York does what [Trump] did, nobody's ever been charged with this."

www.google.com/.../doj-official-calls-trump-prosecutions-perversion-of-justice-in-undercover-clip-donald-trump-nicholas-biase-department-of-justice-alvin-bragg-new-york-hush-money-trial-mug-club-undercover

[goaded]

@Juxtapose "The Post has not reviewed the full, unedited recordings."

"Trump was convicted of 34 counts in his Manhattan “hush money” trial on May 30, 2024."
nypost.com/.../

Trump's been re-indicted by a different grand jury on the exact same charges, relying only on evidence that isn't affected by the SCOTUS decision. While there can't be a trial before the election, more evidence will probably be released on September 26th.

[Juxtapose]

He's literally being tried for doing the same thing every real estate guy in New York does. This is indeed a perversion of justice and the American people can see it. Why do you think a fucking Kennedy and the leading woman of the Democrats is joining Trump? The Democrats have lost their fucking minds.

This is all a bullshit trial while Joe Biden and his fucking crime family get off scot-free. This is bullshit.. but luckily the Supreme Court is making good decisions.

[goaded]

No, he's been convicted for those crimes, and if anyone else is doing the same **to cover up a crime**, like Trump was convicted for, they should be tried for felonies, too. Did I mention he was convicted? By a jury.

The case we're talking about here is the Jan 6 federal case, and, like I said, we'll see even more evidence that wasn't in the indictment on 26 September, even if he has successfully delayed the trial until after the election. It was enough evidence to convince two grand juries there's a case to answer.

The two people who have joined the Republicans definitely have lost their minds, the dozens of people who have worked with Trump and refuse to support him should be more convincing. Those, and the former generals who point out that Trump was to blame for the Afghan pullout.

Have you seen this advert? ↗

[Juxtapose]

You act like these convictions mean something when they are very obvious witch hunts. The American public can see it, the politicians could see it and experts can see it. The only people who cannot see it are those suffering from Trump derangement syndrome.. the same people who believe in the Russia hoax and thought Trump tried to take over the government after he lost a rigged election.

If it's after the election who cares? He can just pardon himself in most cases and he won't have a corrupt doj to deal with anymore. Win-win.

Imagine blaming Trump for the Afghanistan pull out when it was Joe Biden who decided to do that. He was such a fucking moron and he tried to put the blame on Trump. That's so pathetic.

RFK Jr and Tulsi Gabbard are sensible people on the left who recognize the Democrats are a lost cause. The Democrats are so fucked up they are letting in criminal aliens into my state that are chopping the heads off of ducks in parks and cutting the heads off of animals that are people's pets. The savages don't belong in Ohio.

https://youtu.be/ImSlcxvDz4Q?si=18hH6r93_7AUPnR9

[goaded]

Why don't you care about justice or the law any more? That was meant to be the Republican's big claim, right? The "party of law and order"? The law says it's a felony to falsify business records to cover up a crime. A jury unanimously found Trump guilty of all 34 counts.

The only Russia hoax is claiming they didn't help Trump get elected and that they aren't still trying the same shit. Your mate Tim Pool was getting paid $100k a week to make videos, some of which got 8000 views, and he didn't wonder where the money was coming from? Some "journalist". Go read the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on Russia's interference and Trump's close ties to them. There's a link here: www.theatlantic.com/.../

Of course Trump tried to steal the presidency after he lost the election in 2020. He knew he lost the election, he told gullible people that he hadn't and that they had to fight to keep their country, and we all know what happened then. In a little over two weeks, you'll get more evidence about it when Jack Smith presents the evidence he intends to use in the trial you're claiming in this post that Trump won.

It seems everything you believe is a lie.

"Retired generals defend Harris, blame Trump on Afghanistan withdrawal: report"
www.foxnews.com/.../retired-generals-defend-harris-blame-trump-afghanistan-withdrawal-report

I believe the final speaker in your video.

Have you seen the interviews where Trump admits he lost the election?

[PreferNot2Say]

@Juxtapose Just block that fucking moron. He's beyond stupid. He should be embarrassed of how stupid he is at his age. He lacks common sense and critical thinking skills at the most basic level. All he knows is what his media tells him and they've been proven liars for decades. He's emotionally immature and at his late stage in life, is just pathetic. I'm done proving him wrong and him attempting to justify the lawlessness that is the demokkkrat party. I've wasted enough time arguing with this idiot. You shouldn't waste anymore time either. He's so stupid that he will actually think he's won. He's not relevant in any way meaningful.

[goaded]

@PreferNot2Say Your only answer to reality is to block it out. Carry on projecting.

[Juxtapose]

@PreferNot2Say I know I won't change his mind or really get anywhere but it is fun for me. I want to keep tabs on what the deep end of the Marxist side is thinking as well.

[PreferNot2Say]

Absolutely I am. The demokkkrats are so stupid that they can't see that every time they indict him, his support grows exponentially. So they do it two months before the election. Thanks for being so stupid demokkkrats and demokkkrat voters 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[NYCQuestions1976]

The salty far-left liberal tears will be voluminous enough to fill the entire Pacific basin.

[OtterMan68]

If you read past the headline:

The Supreme Court's immunity ruling has now been sent back to the D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which could in turn unlock the case for Chutkan to resume proceedings.

[Juxtapose]

He's gonna slam dunk this.

[OtterMan68]

like he did his 34 felony counts?

[Juxtapose]

He's beating one after the other.

[PreferNot2Say]

@OtterMan68
Can you even list five of these so-called felonies? Or are you just regurgitating what your media spoon-feeds you toddlers? I'll wait for the list of five...

[Dongie]

Happy? As a pig in slop.
We deserve a whole truckload of justice.

[Guacamole409]

What did he do wrong?

[Juxtapose]

Nothing.

[Guacamole409]

I'm currently arguing with a guy from the UK that says there is no difference between left and right. It's like night and day.

[MicahRaine]

To be fair, left and right in the UK is pretty different then here.

[PreferNot2Say]

The only thing Trump has done is to shine a light on the corruption and evil known as the uniparty. They know that he knows of all of their evilness that they've done. Satanists, sacrificing babies, children and adults, human trafficking and a litany of so many other disgusting shit.

Once your eyes are opened, your world will never be the same as it once was.

[PreferNot2Say]

Look up fr@zzle dr! p

[gatixek710]

Sure! The fact it enrages the shitlibs is icing on the cake.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

lol nice

[robocop666]

He is always interesting to watch on TV.

[OddBeMe]

3200k closer to being a billionaire!