Guys, who is the better VP pick?

[Anonymous]

Vance

Walz

[MisterWack]

Walz, hands down for the following:

Making sure all children have food at the cafeteria even if they got no money, increasing child tax credit, fighting for wage increases, having parental leave when bearing a child 15 weeks off paid, etc. is not a partisan leftist because he worked day in & day out to get things done with Republican support in Minnesota to pass legislation to help bring about a brighter day. Maybe this country should be heading in this direction of bipartisanship and not radical right / radical left.
I stand by Minnesota’s Governor because he has done so much good for this nation.
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden got things done that Trump couldn’t do even with a majority in Congress & Senate because he refused to reach across the isle and failed to convince his own right wing constituents to pass the following: Healthcare Reforms, Infrastructure, Fighting Big Pharma, Investment In Millions of American Manufacturing Jobs, Afghan Pullout, Closing of The Border when overload capacity, etc.(all promised and failed by Trump)


Back to Walz’s Accomplishments
- $2.3 Billion investment into education
- $300 million for public safety to combat crime
- Ended non compete contracts, pushed the envelope with paid leave, increased protections for workers of hospitals, Amazon warehouses, schools, nursing homes and more!

We love to see this! America should be Minnesota and will be soon under Harris & Walz vision of the future!

[Anonymous]

Shows how little people know about either of theses men. Walz has a record of failure as a big-spending, high-tax governor overseeing a relatively weak State economy.

www.forbes.com/.../

Minnesota economy is currently shrinking and its people are currently leaving.

Vance has a documented record of success in the private sector by contrast.

[Twalli]

Vance was a pander pick. He was picked solely because Trump wanted people who had a similar upbringing to Vance to vote for him. Vance was critical of Trump beck thrn, snd probably still would be if he wasn't Trump's VP pick.
Waltz was never critical of Herris. He wasn't picked to pander to specific voters. He was picked due to his governmental record.

[Anonymous]

They seem pretty similar. Neither brings a single new person to vote for the candidates, but neither of them provides a lot of incentive for others in the party to get rid of the person on top.