I'll tell you why.
Because when put in a corner they have to argue with emotions with appealing to the genetic fallacy instead of making actual valid arguments.
There are literal groups of people like "secularprolife" that have people that are adamantly atheist and also pro life.
What i find hypocritical and hilarious is that every single one of them appeals to something that isn't real too and has zero evidence that they are real. Not only this, they behave as if they are real so adamantly as if to dedicate their ENTIRE LIVES to it.
Those are called "rights"
They do not exist. And yes they are meaningless even as a social construct because they are negated by someone else's opinion.
They are no more real than someone who says a man has a right to stop an abortion. Its just a meaningless opinion that has no real value. The atheist might as well say their opinion on the leprechaun they talk to is real, because they write it down and other people act as if its real. Well if thats the case, god is real because its written down and people act like he does.
And they're are plenty of pro life atheist arguments coming from the position abortion is wrong even if god is not real.
But no, instead they want to assume incorrectly and make it about sky daddy not real.
Because they dont have an argument.
Your rights fairies that you appeal to that grant you right's don't exist either. Stop acting like they do.
Literally who argued against that?
Dont come at me with this nonsense.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News