How many TONS of bias, must they have, to lie by 14 degrees warmer than observed, as if global warming?

I expected 3 degrees different to make the lie believable but... 14 degrees f. warmer than observed!

Despite 5 hours of sunlight!

The heat of sun is "not trapped" by the diluted co2.

This giant gap is unbelievable so screenshots!

16.6 c. is around 62 f. Is Colder than historical average despite 5 hours of sun!
16.6 c. is around 62 f. Is Colder than historical average despite 5 hours of sun!

But claim about the place on weather website: 7-8 c. degrees warmer than observed

How many TONS of bias, must they have, to lie by 14 degrees warmer than observed, as if global warming?

So How many TONS of bias, must they have, to lie by 14 degrees f. warmer than observed, as if global warming?

In fact historical average 29! But mord than TEN drgrees celcius COLDER than historical average.

But people still believe whatever warming is GLOBAL but is isn't just weather websites misused forecasts and not using local measurements.

How many tons?

Updates
1 y
People don't even NOTICE that COLDER in even one place refuted the "global" part of the fraud. Not global" warming.
They lie "co2 traps heat as a fact" but science is observation the heat left we observe colder.
How many TONS of bias, must they have, to lie by 14 degrees warmer than observed, as if global warming?
Post Opinion