Why do Republicans think Democrats are stealing the election when the only proof has been of Republicans doing so?

[NimbleOcelot]

There has been nothing about Democrats stealing the election, aside from hearsay. Meanwhile, there are voting machines that keep having errors that favor republicans, republicans trying to pass laws to allow them to stop counting votes that came in on time, but they didn't count on time, and Republicans passing laws to make voters wait in long lines and unregistering voters right before the election. So why do they keep saying it's the Democrats?

[seeyounexttuesday]

In 2020, did the FBI and 51 intelligence officials float the lie that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation and 'encourage' social media companies to repress the story?

[NimbleOcelot]

The FBI does this for all evidence in ongoing investigations.

[seeyounexttuesday]

They knew unequivocally that the laptop was real. And they absolutely do not call all ongoing investigations "russian disinformation". Try again.

[NimbleOcelot]

Yes, and the FBI isn't the one who called it that. Also, was anything even found on that laptop aside from dick picks?

[NaultD]

There was hunter biden cock that don dreamed of sucking off the other day on that laptop.

[NimbleOcelot]

@NaultD Fr, I don't understand why they keep bringing it up when nothing was found.

[seeyounexttuesday]

@NimbleOcelot bullshit. They certainly did call it russian disinfo. A knowing lie. Enough people polled said they would have switched their votes had they known about it to give Trump a win.

It was election interference by our own government and blatant cheating. Full stop.

[seeyounexttuesday]

@NaultD Please keep your sexual fantasies in the appropriate section of this website.

[NimbleOcelot]

There's literally nothing on it, and who said it was Russia disinformation? Because as far as I'm aware, the FBI avoids making statements like that. Also, who were these people supposedly polled? I sure wasn't.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Are you retarded? The FBI and 51 ‘former’ intelligence officials lied an said it was russian disinformation.

If nothing was on it, then why the push to oppress news about it?

I know you’re a lefty so reality isn’t your friend…but you literally couldn’t share the link to the NY POST story about the laptop on your own feed.

[NimbleOcelot]

Are you talking about this?

apnews.com/.../hunter-biden-joe-biden-fbi-informant-ec37a35b808ffedf257bb3cfb3fc9ce2

Because if anything, this just proves the whole thing was the right blowing smoke.

[seeyounexttuesday]

No, I’m talking about the FBI and democrats colluding with social media to censor information in the 2020 election with materially affected the vote.

[NimbleOcelot]

What? Elon Musk literally bought Twitter and censored democratic posts, and even posts from Kamala Harris's official Twitter. Social media favors news for republican media. Tf are you talking about?

[seeyounexttuesday]

He got rid of the child porn. Is that what you’re calling democratic posts?

[NimbleOcelot]

So because they didn't find it, he got rid of it? Land of assumptions? What about how Trump was on Epstein's island, has numerous testimonials regarding it, and supposedly even has videos and documentations now?

[seeyounexttuesday]

If you think that Trump was part of Epsteins client list and was never charged despite being charged with accounting errors. You are stupider than I thought

[NimbleOcelot]

But you believe it for Biden Jr, who was also not charged, and has much less evidence? But do you believe that Trump is guilty of what he actually was charged with them?

[seeyounexttuesday]

Thanks for answering without answering

[NimbleOcelot]

Nah, stop ignoring the topic. You believe Biden Jr is guilty with no evidence, but Trump isn't, who actually has evidence against him?

[seeyounexttuesday]

See I don’t play your dumb games.

[NimbleOcelot]

Talking about facts is dumb games now?

[seeyounexttuesday]

Ignoring the reality that your lying about Trump and Epstein then pivot to an irrelevant question is a dumb game.

[NimbleOcelot]

What part did I lie about? Trump himself said he was friends with Epstein. I never pivoted, you did.

[NimbleOcelot]

I literally responded to your stupid question with the same type of question.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Again. Prove he was a client of epsteins or shit the fuck up about it.

[NimbleOcelot]

www.hindustantimes.com/.../...101719981884931.html

apnews.com/.../trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a4b98bb3947d42af9ec83d7db

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJorAVgHy7Y

Not to mention he literally admitted to walking in to teen models dressing rooms.

[seeyounexttuesday]

So the Hindu times and two unrelated links. Got it.

[NimbleOcelot]

They aren't unrelated. They are showcasing his character and his previous and proven sexual misconduct. And you can call my article bad all you want when you disprove the information contained in it.

[seeyounexttuesday]

I already did disprove it. If they had something on Trump and Epstein they would have charged him. They didn’t so they don’t. End of story.

[NimbleOcelot]

You clearly don't understand how the law, especially for the rich, works. We have many testimonials from women who have been raped by Trump. Trump also did everything he could to hinder the FBI, to the point of turning the American public against them. Not being charged with a crime isn't proof that he didn't do it.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Hey dummy. They tried him on misdemeanors that were past the statute of limitations as a felony to keep him off the ballot. They had no problem going after him.

[NimbleOcelot]

It being past the statute of limitations doesn't mean he's innocent. They clearly didn't want to put him in jail, since he was found guilty on something that would put most people in jail, and he didn't receive any jail time for it. His judges kept pushing his court dates back, because HE chose his judges.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Tell me you don’t understand the term statute of limitations without telling me

[NimbleOcelot]

Statute of limitations means it happened long enough ago that it can't be tried in the court of law. Literally what I just said, so wtf you on?

[seeyounexttuesday]

Bingo. Thanks for proving the charges against him were shams.

[NimbleOcelot]

Uh, no. Just because it's past the statute of limitations doesn't mean it didn't happen.

[NimbleOcelot]

Not to mention the stuff he did get charged with were not, and the rest was pushed off by Judge Canon

[seeyounexttuesday]

It’s irrelevant if it happened.

[NimbleOcelot]

What? No it's not. It shows he's literally a bad person and shouldn't be our president. Did you forget the whole point of this discussion?

[seeyounexttuesday]

The whole point has apparently been that you’re dumber than a box of rocks. And Trump’s your president so you have to cope

[NimbleOcelot]

Posting facts and sources is dumb? But relying on faith for someone who has proven that you shouldn't isn't? You are literally voting for people who have admitted to wanting to lower worker rights, but let's see how you feel when they remove medicare, social security, and overtime, which are all things they've been open about wanting to remove. Not to mention the economic bills he did pass all favored the rich.

[NimbleOcelot]

The fact that people on the left have to fight for you to keep your wages and then you call them dumb for it is why the intelligent people are always the first to leave countries that turn into dictatorships.

[seeyounexttuesday]

bahahaha. What kind of lunatic conspiracy theories are you reading that says they're getting rid of overtime and social security when Trump specifically stated his intention is to stop both of them from being taxed?

Illegal immigrants are the ones putting negative pressure on pay. Trump wants to get rid of them as well. It's the leftists that want to keep importing cheap labor.

No intelligent people have left the US.

At this point you're just a complete retard who doesn't live in the same reality as the rest of us.

[NimbleOcelot]

Here, since you don't know how to use Google, I'll just give you the link and let you scroll through them all. He has been pretty open about this, and has said he hates it himself. So it's not even a conspiracy theory just because you think someone who comes from a rich family and is friendly with billionaires like Elon (who comes from a slave owning family) would actually be on your side. www.google.com/search

For social security www.crfb.org/.../what-would-trump-campaign-plans-mean-social-security

How? Please explain your reasoning, because there is literally no evidence of this. Maybe for minimum wage work, but if that was true, surely you'd support raising minimum wage, which is a democratic policy.

Yes, many have. And if things go the way many expect it to, many more will.

No, I actually just pay attention and actually did my research, while filtering out the bs imbedded into a lot of articles. I try to find videos or statements from Trump himself to support my claims. But when I post those, you are all like "he was just joking," even when he says it seriously, with a sense of tension. Trump has been open about wanting to cut benefits for the working class, but most of you ignore it because he tells you otherwise, and surely a rich politician wouldn't lie to the poor, right?

[seeyounexttuesday]

Your link is fucking hilarious. “Not taxing social security benefits would actually be harmful to social security.

The best part is you retards believe this shit.

[NimbleOcelot]

You didn't read the full thing, and maybe learn to understand economics or where the money for social security comes from. I also like how you ignored the rest of it when you couldn't come up with a "witty" retort.

by the way, here is a better, more in depth article on it from NYT, which is historically pro republican, that should hopefully be able to explain it better to a simpleton like you. www.nytimes.com/.../...cial-security-benefits.html

[seeyounexttuesday]

New York Times is republican. That’s rich..

[NimbleOcelot]

Either way, it's a much better source, and you can't argue with the details.

[NimbleOcelot]

Stop avoiding the main point.

[seeyounexttuesday]

What’s to avoid? It’s absolutely retarded to try to gaslight people into believing that SS benefits should be taxed because it’s good for them.

[NimbleOcelot]

Because not just the SS gets taxed. The main point is how the SS benefits are expected to run out, and Trump is going to make them run out much much sooner.

[seeyounexttuesday]

They ain’t gonna run out because they aren’t taxed. Holy shit you can’t be this stupid.

[NimbleOcelot]

Maybe read the articles I post. Literally no one is denying it, and everyone is in agreement.

[seeyounexttuesday]

literally no one. Good lord. I’ve read everything.

[NimbleOcelot]

Except the article I provided, and the sources it contains.

[NimbleOcelot]

Because if you are wrong, that means you messed up, and you'd rather be the bad guy than to admit you were wrong.

[seeyounexttuesday]

lol, reading propaganda from the corporate media isn't proof. When are you going to realize this?

[NimbleOcelot]

Yet you read propaganda from corporate media. Stats aren't propaganda. Opinions are.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Yet I don't. There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

[NimbleOcelot]

You are literally refusing to read my source because it proved you wrong. Take a look at yourself. You are allowing complacency because you don't want to be wrong, because then that'd mean you aren't as good of a person as you thought.

[seeyounexttuesday]

I explained it to you already. I don’t read propaganda.

[NimbleOcelot]

In other words, you are afraid to be proven wrong, and refuse to accept anything that doesn't fit your worldview. I linked a reputable journal and you linked a laughingstock journal. Not wasting my time with someone who is willfully ignorant so they can't be proven wrong.

[BarryLiverstone]

Because both sides see an advantage in demonizing the other

[Anonymous]

When you're in a cult "because Trump said so" is considered indisputible fact.

[saraupstairs]

Do you have the brains to debate me?

[NimbleOcelot]

I've posted my initial argument. Come at me.

[saraupstairs]

Did you count the votes?

[NimbleOcelot]

They have officials who do that, who have been investigated when proposed by Trump and nothing was found.

[saraupstairs]

Do you trust them?

[NimbleOcelot]

I trust that they have been investigated, and the ones who have had things found against them have erred on the side of Republicans.

[saraupstairs]

Biden said his uncle was eaten by a cannibal. Do you believe him?

[NimbleOcelot]

I don't know. I don't think Biden even knows. I think he believes it, and it may be true, or it may not be. There's no evidence to say either way for sure as far as I am aware.

[saraupstairs]

No evidence? lol

[NimbleOcelot]

About his uncle getting eaten by cannibals? I haven't looked into it, because it's not important to me, but if there is evidence, I don't understand the purpose of the argument.

[saraupstairs]

Was Biden an airline pilot?

[NimbleOcelot]

I don't know, can you please state your point or how this is relevant to the topic at hand?

[saraupstairs]

He was a also a long-haul trucker. And you are asking for proof of this. Just say you hate Trump and tell me why..

[NimbleOcelot]

Probably because as I stated in my title, they have blamed democrats for election interference while they do it blatantly. Trump as said multiple times how he'd screw over his own workers if there were laws about it, such as removing overtime pay and other things. Not to mention he keeps trying to divide the country by calling Americans "the enemy within" while he talks highly about Putin and Kim Jong Un, while Russia puts out bounties for American troops.

[NimbleOcelot]

And if someone is going to accuse the election of being stolen, they should have proof in order for you to believe them.

[NimbleOcelot]

Wait, I'm confused. Was your argument that I should just believe whatever trump says?

[saraupstairs]

You're not confused.

[NimbleOcelot]

Ok, so then why should I just believe Trump for no reason?