Completely honest: If anything, which gender would be considered more "capable" to another overall based on contributions and biological traits?

If you truly had to choose one, being completely honest and objective, and ignoring all propaganda or ideological influences like feminism, capitalism, communism, MRA, Red Pill, 4B movements, etc. Which gender would you consider more significant in terms of overall contributions and biological traits? Please approach this question from a purely natural perspective and using common sense based on reality and history, without letting emotions or external narratives from the media influence your response.

Men, but women are significant as well but men have a bit more
Women, but men are significant as well but women have a bit more
Men. Women are useless (I got this from mainstream media and I believe in it)
Women. Men are useless (I got this from mainstream media and I believe in it)
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Completely honest: If anything, which gender would be considered more "capable" to another overall based on contributions and biological traits?
Post Opinion