If the ideas and claims that you base your opinions on were proven false by many unbiased sources would you accept that or continue to believe lies?

[SmokinAces2000]

[Syntosi]

Yes. I would even go as far as to point out that if something were proven false then I dont even care if its from a biased source or not. The proof would be enough on its own. Of course there are instances where you can't trust the proof provided because of the source such as if its based on their their analysis or survey but that goes without saying.

[Still-alive]

i go where the evidence goes. i also avoid people who ignore it

[NaultD]

Seeing how there is a saying.

A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes.

It really dosen't matter.

[NathanDavis]

they are my own... I didn't adopt them from others

[slatyb]

I would definitely accept that. I'm always interested in new facts, or old facts that I wasn't aware of. But "many unbiased sources" means authoritative sources, not random claims.

[Summeroflove]

If I’m wrong I’ll admit I’m wrong but I’m not going to apologize just to appease someone either. Those days are over for me.

[DrPepper12]

Not unless those sources had public accessable transparent data.

[exitseven]

probably/ I would have to trust the sources and today that is not so easy.

[Dargil]

How would you know if those sources were unbiased? Like NOAA and the UN?

[Anonymous]

Who says they are unbiased?