
More men have IQs below 60 and above 140. However, if men are more intelligent then women, why do girls get better grades in school and why are more girls graduating from college?

More men have IQs below 60 and above 140. However, if men are more intelligent then women, why do girls get better grades in school and why are more girls graduating from college?
Kelley1 wants to hear from Guys only. Login to share your opinion.
Our brain sizes are both fully capable of the full span of human intelligence. So while size does correlate loosely to intelligence, it is not a factor here. It should also be noted that the simplified importance is brain size relative to body. Which makes us basically equal.
Men and women have both taken turns to have the higher average IQ in the last 20 or so years. Hinting at there being no significant difference. Which is, given we function different, actually surprising.
Your graph is one of the more interesting phenomena and entirely accurate. Men are overrepresented in both the high and low end of performance. This is not just the case for IQ but a general tendency. Men tend to fail worse and succeed further. Hinting that it might be a simple product of mentality. In short, it is very likely that the dumbest and smartest people you know are men.
School and grades is an emerging argument for women being smarter. Given that intelligence is grown when nurtured it may well be true. It is, I believe, important to remember that girls were significantly worse than boys in school until a series of educational reforms (the last truly major in 1988) to make the educational environment and taught material more suited to women.
These efforts turned out to be very effective and we saw an upswing in the performance of women worldwide. Unsurprisingly, adapting education to suit one gender over the other has also resulted in the gender that education is not adapted for performing gradually worse. Holding it against men that they perform worse in an arena specifically built to provide advantage to women I find close minded at best. Having sisters i do not mind this, but it would be unfair if I give them a handicap and then get taunted for it.
In reality boys today are underperforming enough educationally now that it is probably time to look at how we can make education more suited for boys too. Ideally we would learn from our success and unintended side-effects and seek to do this without creating a disadvantage for girls. It is worrying that the world keeps being distracted and unable to tackle issues like this because of it.
No, because that's not a proportional relationship. It is brain size to body mass. For instance, a blue whale's brain is a lot bigger than ours, but I don't see them creating interstellar space flight... or hunting us.
Google encephalization quotient.
From Google AI:
The Encephalization Quotient (EQ) is a relative measure of brain size, comparing the actual brain mass of an animal to its expected brain mass based on its body size. It's defined as the ratio of observed brain mass to predicted brain mass, calculated using nonlinear regression on a range of reference species. [1, 2]
Here's a more detailed explanation:
What it is: [1, 2]
• EQ is a way to compare brain size across different species, accounting for body size differences. [1, 2]
• It helps assess the level of brain development and complexity, especially in mammals. [2, 3]
• A higher EQ indicates that an animal's brain is larger than expected for its body size, and is often associated with greater cognitive abilities. [3]
How it's calculated: [4]
• The formula for calculating EQ in mammals and birds is: brain mass / (0.12 * (body mass)^0.66), according to Oxford Reference. [4]
• An EQ of 1 means an animal has an average brain size for its body weight. [5]
• Humans have a significantly high EQ, typically around 7, meaning their brain is seven times larger than expected for their body size. [4, 6]
• Other animals, like dogs, have EQs slightly above 1. [5]
Examples: [5, 6]
• Humans have a high EQ (around 7).
• Dolphins also have a relatively high EQ (5.3).
• Gorillas and chimpanzees have lower EQs (1.5-1.8 and 2.2-2.5, respectively). [5, 6]
Generative AI is experimental.
[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encephalization_quotient[2] www.sciencedirect.com/.../encephalization-quotient[3] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3207484/[4] www.oxfordreference.com/.../authority.20110803095750677[5] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7192336/[6] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4685590/
Whales don't have fingers and an opposing thumb. What would we have accomplished without toes and fingers? Nothing.
Koko, the female gorilla, may have (not certain) had an IQ equal to that of children. It is hard to compare intelligence between species. It may be hard to compare intelligence between males and females. I believe our IQs are close to equal, with a very slight nod to males, but I am certainly not certain that the nod should be given to males.
Well, you are right... toes and fingers and THUMBS are helpful. (*)
So is a decent lifespan.
If cephalopods lived for decades like we do instead of only 2 to 5 years, they might be ruling the oceans.
(*) Keep in mind how evolution works. If your species is evolved to be successful within its environment, then there's no evolutionary pressure to improve. For example, sharks are very old and haven't changed much for millions of years. Why not? They don't need to.
Cetaceans like blue whales, dolphins, killer whales (orcas), etc. are all reasonably intelligent - especially dolphins and orcas. They cooperate and have social groups and these have helped them survive. Do they need thumbs and toes? Not really. They are successful without them and, indeed, having toes and thumbs would be a problem for them because that would reduce their streamlining meaning they'd be worse swimmers and less likely to be successful hunters.
It's important to know that.
Intelligence is only part of surviving though. This is also important to understand. Your brain, like any control system, processes information based on what it senses. This is important in humans because males and females are evolved differently and I am not just talking about genitalia...
Male and female senses are actually different and evolved to be that way. This affects what information we get and how we process it. Furthermore, we are affected by other environmental conditions that can impact how we sense or think. For instance, alcohol has caused plenty of bad irresponsible decisions and unintended babies.
Understanding the differences between men and women is beyond my mental capacity. What I do know is that whatever human abilities and characteristics produce the most living descendants are the winners in the evolutionary race. Sadly, at least in my opinion, that may not be the most intelligent. At least in the near-term (100 to 1,000 or more years), the more intelligent may be losing the evolutionary race for survival.
You underestimate yourself.
Here's an example of what I am talking about how our brains (and thus senses) are evolved differently between men and women...
A psychological experiment was performed in which people listened to a recording of multiple conversations happening simultaneously. They were asked to describe as best as possible what they were hearing.
It was discovered that women had a more difficult time than men. This is because women are evolved to hear as much as they can - all sound may contain information which could be critical - like a crying child. Anyway, the women were basically trying to keep track of all of the conversations.
Men ended up selecting a conversation and then listened to the one and were able to ignore all the others. They were more focused. And men WOULD be evolved for that because, outside of the communal group (which is where women and children congregate), the older males would go out into the world and either kill prey or try to kill predators or avoid predators. This caused them to be more visual than females but also more focused and the animal or enemy of interest. It also caused them to be more quiet and less volunteering of information. If a predator hears you, the predator comes after you and kills you. If your prey hears you, they run off before you can kill it and thus you go hungry.
So, ...
Males are evolved to look and listen more and speak less because that helps them kill food and eradicate threats and stay alive. Being focused on those threats and prey helps maximize survival keeping the group and children alive.
Females are evolved to be more communal sharing information and helping each other more because this helps maximize survival of the group and children.
The smartest dudes get dumb when they see a big boob babe !!!
“Guys, Males have larger brains than females, and brain size is positively correlated with intelligence. Does that imply that men are more intelligent?”
I think that is a misconception, brain size doesn’t matter. Secondly, IQ Tests don’t really showcase street smarts or common sense which those attributes do contribute to someone’s overall intelligence / ability to function.
I also want to say that, grades also don’t showcase intellect since me having a learning disability did hold me back in some regards though I’m able to give good advice when able also am able to absorb knowledge in topics that I have interest in which zones in my skills.
I believe women can and will achieve a lot in this world when the resources are ripe for the picking, more doors should be open since the more people that have a life of happiness, devotion, reaching for the stars, and being the best selves they can be is a wonderful member of society.
There are men are less likely to wear masks / get vaccinated as women so, intellect isn’t on their side there (I know I’m making fun of myself here, but a lot of guys do this). Men are more likely to vape & smoke too, so another point for women.
Men: We have more retards and more ultra intelligent nerds.
Females: Usually just really average.
I'm almost afraid to answer this question because I know the tards from both genders will attack me for saying as much as I said already, but if you do the math it all evens out. The biggest difference between our genders is your dumbest women will always have a man dumber than her to do something dumber, and your smartest women will always have a man smarter than her to...
beat her ass just like a trans woman (a man) beats the shit out of women in women's sports.
Look at humor for instance... it's a sign of intelligence. The dumber people will get offended by that gender joke I just made even though it's true. Those dumb people can get a college degree all they want... they'll still serve my coffee at a service job with their under water basket weaving degree that's been catered to serve mainly women. I'm not saying all women, but I have to give this disclaimer for the dumb women and the really really dumb men that will back up the dumb women.
But who the fuck cares, they're retarded. Double digit IQs and shit.
Why are more girls graduating from college?
Having a college degree does not mean your intelligent especially with all the idiotic and useless degree's that colleges have these days. There are a lot of educated idiots both professors in colleges and graduates. Where as the most intelligence driven fields in colleges are almost always usually dominated by men.
Women may be graduating from college more but what degree's are they graduating with? Is it a an actual useful degree that will make back the money you spent to get it? Will it secure them a solid career path and a stable well paying job? Or is it a useless degree that was a waste of money and has no future? Those are the actual questions you should be asking.
Another thing to note is that on average men when they do go into college go into far more complex and harder to get into fields then women do.
On top of that men are more likely to go into trades then colleges thus would go to a trade school and not a college and no they are not the same thing.
Or they were like me and went to a learning institution. Where I learned the inner workers of things like, physiology, biology, kinesiology, biomechanics, etc.
Also lets be frank men in general have more opportunities to learn job field related skills outside of college and on average have more job opportunities then women do without going to college.
The place I work at right now I make decent money and not only that acquired a wide plethora of skills and experience regarding the agricultural field as well as mechanical and machinery related stuff all without a college education.
I could also go to a manufacturing plant in my town right now get a job there and within a few years make almost as much as a nurse does all without getting a college education.
There are more women in university because most women study useless courses, while the best courses, which are for intelligent people, are always dominated by men (statistics, electronic engineering, mechanical engineering, chemical engineering, etc.), with the exception of medicine, I study medicine and women make up 50%, however, despite that course being very good, women benefit from the fact that there isn't much math, if there were more math, the rate of women in medicine would plummet.
@oldpigg Males have larger brains than females, even when corrected for body size, and brain size is positively correlated with intelligence. This leads to the expectation that males should have higher average levels of intelligence than females. Yet the consensus view is that there is no sex difference in general intelligence.
Among adults, males have slightly higher reasoning abilities than females and a more pronounced superiority on spatial abilities. Females may be better at language with equal memory ability.
No that doesn't imply men are more intelligent but on average, the male IQ distribution is slightly more flat spread and slightly more skewed to higher IQ values. So generally speaking men and women are very close but in the extremes there's the big differences. The smartest men are far smarter than the smartest women. Vice versa, the dumbest men are also dumber than the dumbest women. But overall men are smarter on average. Not enough to make a huge difference that's noticeable but it's statistically evident and significant.
Among adults, males have slightly higher verbal and reasoning abilities than females and a more pronounced superiority on spatial abilities. If the three abilities are combined to form general intelligence, the mean for males is 4 IQ points higher than the mean for females.
That is not a significant difference. I suppose, depending on how it is designed, an IQ test might give a slight nod to women.
an iq test is designet to test intelligence, not gender. and we already have the stats. I don't know why you are trying to introduce your own rudimentary non empirical way to derivate your very own version of "IQ" testing, when the large scale suveys have already been done and we already know these things. it's almost like you're not satisfied with the result and that's why you wanna do it over. almost as if you can't stand the fact that on average males are a bit higher in iq even tho that small statistical difference doesn't noticably matter in anyones individual live.
the reason you make an iq test is to figure out how intelligent people are. the point isn't to determine women must be slightly smarter so you have to rig the tests untill that becomes truth. that's opposite of science. that's delusion
besides you posted a wrong graph that was probably made by buzzfeed. here's the actual distribution of iq in society as measured by cambridge university and confirmed in similar studies by many others:
That is a difficult graft to understand, and it is certainly not valid. The average IQs are going to be the peaks, showing that women have an average IQ of 110 and men have an average IQ of 114. I don't doubt that men have an average IQ 4 points above women. However, by definition, the average IQ is 100 not 112. Therefore, that that graft is false.
well it's a cambridge university study. it's students. students are on average more intelligent than the more general population. that's why.
it's the same in general population. male iq is spread further than female iq and the iq is slightly higher, which is as i said not very noticable in the average range but is very noticable at the extreme ends.
the funny thing is that women still do better in school and university. cause somehow the so called "patriarchy" as feminazis love to call it has built a system that caters more to women and neglects men in terms of efficient teaching methods.
and even more funny: men still do better economically even tho they perform worse in the educational system.
I don't accept that argument. The graft includes IQs in the 70s and below. To be admitted to the University of Cambridge, US applicants should meet the following requirements:
Submit SAT/ACT scores. Minimum SAT score: 1460. Minimum ACT score: 32-33.
Have a competitive GPA of 3.7 or higher.
They have zero students with IQs below 90 and far more likely than not, none below 100. Even any students with an 110 IQ is questionable.
well you not accepting it doesn't matter for the truth of it. if you wanna live in denial of truth, that's your thing. many people stay delusional for some reason. i don't get it. you're free to think what you like. you're free to be wrong.
More important than absolute brain size (which is what the graph shows) is relative size of the brain to the body as a whole.
Males are, on average, physically taller, larger and heavier than average females. A physically larger brain is needed to manage that extra size, and has nothing to do with intelligence differences between males and females..
Schools and colleges give females more passes, even if they deny this. It's like a form of modern day affirmative action for women.
Back in the early 2000s I remember the constant news reports about girls failing in schools, why our culture wasn't doing more to help them in education, what needed to change, etc. Then magically overnight you started hearing alllllll these reports that girls were suddenly pulling ahead of boys in school and graduating from college much more than them. Do you think girls were really performing significantly better out of the blue in only a few years? Or did all the reports of them failing in school pressure schools and colleges to start giving them a pass?
Don't forget that there's both nature and nurture.
Even if you have a slight disposition towards intelligence, if you never learn, you won't get much out of it.
It could be that IQ tests are flawed as well, the amount of attention you have during the test, your drive to perform well on them, etc.
Similarly, the way people are taught at school could benefit some more than others.
Some of those qualities could be more inherent to a gender, but it could also be a cultural phenomenon that nurtured it.
I think there's a lot to this subject, so the answer won't be as straightforward.
You can argue or explain small differences. However, whether sports or intelligence, you can not explain huge differences. It doesn't matter their language or background. Occasionally, like one in a million, someone is super bright. All IQ tests, in fact, any test, will pick it up. It is the same in sports or music. People like Jim Thorpe could easily do things from early childhood that most of us could never do, if we trained a lifetime.
Schools are run to promote methods of achievement that are more suited to girls. It's also a situation that, feminists may disagree but it's evidential, women are the primary providers of education and you can guess they will have subconscious bias toward girls and against (the patriarchy) BOYS.
Women get better grades because a large part of the male brain is always allocated to sex, thinking about ways to have sex, finding someone to have sex with, thinking of the ways you want to have sex.
Think of it like if your computer is running a program 24/7 that is eating up a lot of the processing power, what's left is for everything else and everything else runs a little slower.
That sex. exe program that's running 24/7 in his brain is slowing everything else down
Girls get far more free money for college than men. Plus, many teachers go easier on girls than men when it comes to grades and turning in complete work on time. I have seen it repeatedly.
I haven’t seen a significant difference in intelligence between men and women.
Males have larger brains than females, even when corrected for body size, and brain size is positively correlated with intelligence. This leads to the expectation that males should have higher average levels of intelligence than females. Yet the consensus view is that there is no sex difference in general intelligence. An examination of the literature shows that the consensus view is wrong. Among adults, males have slightly higher verbal and reasoning abilities than females and a more pronounced superiority on spatial abilities. If the three abilities are combined to form general intelligence, the mean for males is 4 IQ points higher than the mean for females. Richard Lynn.
www.sciencedirect.com/.../0191886994900302
Because most teachers are female and make tests for female thinking pupils - not for sexist reasons but because this way of thinking is normal for them.
Forget about the IQ (Intelligence Quotient) difference. I want to see the CQ (Crazy Quotient) difference.
Both men and women are intelligent and have the capacity to learn. Men seem to be on the edges, both more men with lower iq and men with higher iq. However to succeed in school a medium iq is ok and most people have that
Lol. Men more intelligent. Good one. My AP classes freshman year was half half. By senior year it was 80% women. Women have better SOFT skills for education advancement.
Whales have much larger brands than we do. Does that make them more intelligent than us?
My IQ is 94 and i have the head feet and hands sizes of women
Just because you have a bigger head doesn’t mean you won’t think with the smaller one…. lol
Men in general are more intelligent, no it's true, really, I'm not lying.
My 15 pound dog is smarter than most people. Women are smart, but their emotion perplexes men...
Because there is not a 100% correlation between grades and intelligence.
Keep telling yourself that
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions