Do you trust "THE" science?

[Lliam]

Anyone who declares that only "they" know the science should check this out.
"Trust the science" has never been anything other than a marketing term that means shut up and obey.
Yes, I DO trust in the scientific method...
but coercion is not science,
withholding data is not science,
manipulating data is not science,
cherrypicking studies is not science,
social conditioning is not science,
fear mongering is not science,
and censorship is not science...

OF COURSE ALL SCIENTISTS WOULD AGREE
WHEN YOU CENSOR THE ONES WHO DON'T...

THE SCIENCE IS NOT SETTLED, IT'S FUNDED! The most important statement of all.

The question then is Who is funding this study? And "Who will profit from this?" You will be shocked to hear the answers.

10,000 Research Papers Were Retracted In 2023, Breaking Annual Records
https://www.iflscience.com/10000-research-papers-were-retracted-in-2023-breaking-annual-records-72071

https://external-preview.redd.it/_rqoRYnw17l2NbIAQZlpMJWIJWGxEEUlFeybJAQ3yzU.jpg?format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=935b3b6cd94737428e6c9ea161485c67dfa4fb6d

https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/allthetropes/images/f/f1/Os_tvdoctorprint_copy_copy_2548.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/338?cb=20240927172820

[seeyounexttuesday]

Science has been corrupted. The covid debacle and climate change shams have proven that.

[Dargil]

Science is rarely ever settled.

[14gurlz2gagonit]

This is a great post and it's so true.

Too bad a whole grip of TDS having freaks are going to flip out because they know you're talking shit about their boys Biden and Fauci.

Don't take them serious... their brains are broken and their logic only extends as far as just siding with anything that opposed the agenda.

Trust me... I pointed out Covid was some bullshit that was overblown as well as the measures against it, and a whole grip of them hit me with already debunked "facts" that obviously came stright from CNN when every commercial said "brought to you by Pfizer"

I think this was a good post, but I'm going to count how many of those retards show up here and jot their usernames down.

[Lliam]

@14gurlz2gagonit. Thank you. And you are so right about the normies who refuse to believe anything that doesn't come from their "trusted" corporate media. They've been trained to call anything else "fake news" or "conspiracy theory". LOL

[14gurlz2gagonit]

Oh gawd yeah... I took the liberty to read through the answers you got here. Holy fuck there are so many people that can't even pass the retard test.

They don't research what they're told from the start or even question it, but the most irritating part is that they feel they have to defend it as if their way of life depends on putting random people on the internet in their place and make sure they also conform to the propaganda they have been fed.

I'll put it like this... I also heard exactly what they've been told. I didn't stop just there though, and I listened to other's as well. They just stopped and when other's tried to speak, they did exactly what they do here. ... Somewhere they just stop listening and they don't allow themselves to think for themselves with all the evidence. G@G is rife with these retards.

[QuestionObsession]

I made this conclusion as a joke a while back that, if you want to make anything believable to the general public, just call it a 'study' or 'research' or 'survey'. And the dumb sheep people will buy it with eyes shut.

There are 3 types of scientists.

1) The scientists who do not deviate from science and remain steadfast through all struggles.

2) The scientists who give in to the sponsor's foul play of science that serves their interests, because they need the funding.

3) The scientists who are in their field only to make money and garner fame and don't care about the science. Tony Fauci and the likes are among them.


Unfortunately the 3rd type outnumber the first 2 types by a dozen to 1.

[NaultD]

Here's the fundamental problem. To be a credible scientist you need 1000s of page's of writing and realistically no one is reading every word. So in a lot of ways they are creating a Forrest of page's of science.

So where is the best place to hide a giant tree of lies? In a forest of research.

[Fireguy17]

Nope, I'm pretty cynical, so i really don't trust "the science" especially when a politician is telling you to.

[Lliam]

Science, yes. "The" science isn't a thing. Am I right? Follow the money.

[Fireguy17]

That makes more sense.
Im thinking that you can find an "expert" to tell you what you want to hear.

[Lliam]

True.

[SmokinAces2000]

Well when countless scientists in multiple different countries are all coming to the same conclusion I’m not going to trust one person or a very small group of “scientists” that are claiming something else without substantial evidence and experiments.

[Lliam]

All scientists appear to agree when you block, ban, censor, mock, slander and threaten those who don't. It looks like there is consensus when no arguments are allowed to be heard. But that is not how science works.

[SmokinAces2000]

That would mean that as I said, “the countless scientists in multiple different counties” all banded together to push one narrative and suppress another. I don’t believe that and I don’t see how any one could logically come to that conclusion.

[SmokinAces2000]

A perfect example is the idea that vaccines cause autism. One dude made the claim that vaccines cause autism and thousands of scientists debunked it. We still have people that believe this nonsense wholeheartedly.

[Lliam]

Of course it t wasn't scientists who banded together to push one narrative and suppress another. It was industries and media. But many doctors and scientists backed the narrative in order to keep their jobs.

[SmokinAces2000]

Is there a specific topic you have in mind?

[Lliam]

Covid, ways of treating it, and the dangers of the mRNA jabs are the ultimate example.

by the way, thousands of scientists did not debunk the idea that the skyrocketing rate of autism is caused by vaccines. That idea hasn't been scientifically debunked. It's the pharma industry that denies it.

[SmokinAces2000]

When it comes to the covid vaccines I’m fairly certain that people were warned about the dangers as they are with any vaccine but with that being said, I personally never got the vaccine because it was too new so I’d agree with being skeptical or cautious about it. As for do vaccines cause autism, multiple independent scientific studies that have no ties to big pharma have all come to the conclusion that there isn’t a link between vaccines and autism.

[Levin]

"That would mean that as I said, “the countless scientists in multiple different counties” all banded together to push one narrative and suppress another. I don’t believe that and I don’t see how any one could logically come to that conclusion. "

That's not really the nuance of it.
Just because they are scientists doesn't mean they don't have the same human frailties. How many people in the UK did I speak to after say they didn't want the vaccine but they got it so they could 'still go on holiday' ie obviously we had the coercion of you wouldn't be able to travel. Even one of my critically minded buds said she was wholly against getting the vaccine and the whole covid farce, but still ended up getting the poison juice because 'she needed to travel'. Scientists are not objective robots. They are just as weak as anybody else, and still, evidently, beholden to fear, the fear campaign. There's a lot of weakness. A lot of spinelessness. A lot of people wanted to retain their jobs, pension, benefits, they didn't want to rock the boat. A lot of people clearly knew better. If the ones who were sceptical did speak up, then the whole thing couldn't have happened. We learnt a lot about the human race. Scientists are clearly blinkered by their own paradigm, the inability to see the woods from the trees. We also have some kind of philosophy of safetyism, which merely reflects the level of decay in society at large. 20 , 30 years ago, people would have just said, well we need to get on with it. That's even if they would have been aware there was anything taking place, given covid had such a large scale marketing/fear campaign.

But honestly, the whole thing was such a patent load of bollocks, god help anyone at this point who doesn't see it.

The failing paradigms have merely shot themselves in the foot. Because now people trust scientific and government institutions even less.

[Anonymous]

I agree. Because ultimately the science can be bought and the government has used science in the past to lie to us. Remember how duck and cover was going to help us survive nuclear apocalypse?

[AviatorTom]

Science, by definition, involves repeating tests to to verify and confirm the science.

[astralpro300]

covid vaxines removed my braincells thats how it feels like mr @Lliam

[exitseven]

This is 100% correct. You have to follow the money. A lot of so called science these days are scams run by the democrats to get organizations that contribute to their campaigns funded by the government.

[jshm2]

No. Science is just a tool. Too many use it as a panacea.

[Pterodon]

Noe. Science has been wrong before. Remember frontal lobatamies?

[Anonymous]

Generally speaking - yes. But I don't trust corrupted scientists.

[Anonymous]

Dr fauci proved that science is sold to the highest bidder.

[Gaylordslav]

I worship at the feet of the men in white robes