
Several of the six federal agents saw him, one accompanied him in a lift with his lawyer, the others used the wrong lift and had to run around the building. Maybe some of them should be fired, and not the people looking after the nuclear weapons.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Several of the six federal agents saw him, one accompanied him in a lift with his lawyer, the others used the wrong lift and had to run around the building. Maybe some of them should be fired, and not the people looking after the nuclear weapons.
Well can't say we didn't see this coming, but yes.
Apparently the message is loud and clear. Since the right's favorite movie characters from the 2021 movie the January 6th insurrection and trump have been reasonably charged with felony they see it befitting to start demonizing, the judges who think and act clearly, the reasonable judges that make decisions without any political favoritism of the right or the left. If any judge does something republican maga doesn't like their days as a judge are numbered, regardless of the judge just doing his or her job.
It's been mentioned this will be the way of the land in their conservative promise project 2025.
Law and order, it's been some good times.
Beginning: “after evidence of Judge Dugan obstructing an immigration arrest operation last week.”
Middle: “We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away… allowing the subject - an illegal alien - to evade arrest.”
End: “We will have more to share soon.”
Shouldn’t you release the evidence right after the arrest was made in a form of warrant or other official documentation like how government used to be before you clowns got in? Also if you had the evidence for a week and refuse to show it, how can we possibly believe you will be transparent enough to share more when you didn’t share anything thus far.
Madness.
THIS:
"Shouldn’t you release the evidence right after the arrest was made in a form of warrant or other official documentation like how government used to be before you clowns got in?"
NO. That's not how the justice system works.
You release nothing until there is an actual indictment is issued by a grand jury. THEY see any evidence before charges are brought. Arrests can be made before charges brought, but the arresting authority must present probable cause almost immediately. That's what Habeus corpus is all about; that the person being detained has a right to appear before a judge to ensure that their being held is legal.
Believe it or not, the nonrelease of evidence protects the accused. For instance, suppose Bob is a presumptive child pornographer. He is arrested and held. Evidence is presented to the grand jury includes genuine child pornography images and videos on Bob's computer. But the grand jury is smart and they ask if anyone else has access to the computer and/or may have Bob's password. Did they talk to other family members? Etc... The prosecution didn't check that...
(It turns out that the culprit is Bob's wife who secretly hates Bob. She had Bob's password and secretly planted the child porn on Bob's computer and set Bob up hoping he'd get prison. This way, she doesn't have to divorce him but can enjoy their life without him.)
The grand jury decides not to indict Bob and charges against Bob are dropped... for now. The prosecution and police may continue to investigate and maybe they will discover it was Bob's wife... This is the sort of shit you see on Law & Order...
Anyway, do you see how Bob is protected? If the prosecution released evidence that Bob's computer had child porn, then Bob's reputation is screwed even if he is later absolved of it. That's just human nature - there will always be people who will believe that Bob is into child porn, especially Bob's wife's family.
I know this, its from our history lessons from german schools when we learn about NS times.
Opinion
15Opinion
No one is above the law.
Judge Dugan went out of her way to interrupt the defendant's trial and led them out a back entrance, because she knew that ICE agents were waiting outside her courtroom to take them into custody and probably deport them. This resulted in a foot chase out on a public street that could have injured innocent members of the public.
There is no doubt that what she did was wrong, knowingly helping criminals to escape... from their trial as well as from ICE. That's multiple felony counts, and she should be prosecuted. Judges should uphold the law, not knowingly break it.
Now, hold on.
If she was genuinely obstructing justice, then she was obstructing justice and that's a felony no matter what your political persuasion.
However, yes, it doesn't look good.
See Glenn Kirschner's take on it:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/uW_uY5QIVsYThese guys are playing hardball. Nothing will keep President Trump from doing the people's business. That is why we elected him. We did not elect these so called judges.
@Danzigdawson hahahahaha
Sure.
I hope this is the red line to wake USA Americans up
Grateful to be included among "Americans" ...
It's a sign that the fascist have gone for ending the notion of rule of law and due process.
https://youtu.be/kHvCFBv6Ajs?si=JGp6eASZh76dF30-
Watch your own left-wing news speak about it.
@Dongie Reporting on what happened isn't confirmation of anything apart from the actions of agents of the regime taking it upon themselves to carry out criminal acts against the rule of law against members of society that true followers of the rule of law can see the flaws in won't facilitate for them.
@Dongie The REGIME is NOT THE law. HFS that you're so ignorant of your own country's systems of checks and balances that create the law is written down and QUALIFIED, EDUCATED and APPOINTED professionals are there to INTERPRET not get elected and then decide what the law is. Just like gun owners think they are the law and can execute someone who scares them.
@Dongie "What due process did they afford us?" Doesn't matter. The constitution and therefore the law says they're entitled to challenge accusations against them.
Apart from anything else, when the Trump administration actually brought people to court claiming they should be deported the judge ripped them a new one because they presented no evidence. How many of the people in an El Salvador concentration camp are the same?
Trumps America. It’s only going to get worse.
I thought it was funny when that judge had a picture of him hugging his gay lover, illegal alien.
Wheres that seeyounexttuesday joke account? I wanna see him defend this
How dare they do this to a sitting judge. Everyone knows they are ABOVE the law!
How very... Moustachioed Madman of you, Mr. President !!!
Yeah... judges court room is their domain. LEO has no right
Crazy country
Make sure you support Israel, otherwise you’ll get deported
@blackeagle007 The accusations of antisemitism against people standing with Jews against the Israeli government is insane.
We’re not in a free society right now. But that’s what the maga’s wanted
Arrest those that legislate from the bench.
Naah. We'll just let them deliberate. And then try to enforce their rulings.
All rulings. All courts.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions