Is Charlie Kirk some new MAGA thing?

Question

katiesmuff · Accepted Answer

I had never heard of him before he was killed, but seems yes he was some kind of mouthpiece for the MAGA movement which certainly removes any credibility he might of had. Wouldn't wish him dead, however when your spreading the lies and crudeness that is the maga way I'm just not surprised or shocked that it happened.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

Just like the staged Trump assassination, the Kirk murder was just another Trump diversion to stop people talking about the Epstein files. In both cases, no autopsy, no police report, nothing. It is astonishing what the MAGA idiots will believe.

contentious · Answer

Nope. MAGA has always been pro free speech and has been persecuted like Charlie for the past decade as a result of it. Countless American citizens have been censored by the left-wing (Nazi book burners) on just about every platform so that left wingers could preserve their echo chambers and brainwash naive individuals. Charlie Kirk has been around debating left wingers for many years. He did a lot of campaign work on college campuses for Trump. He believed in the Constitution of the United States, Judeo-Christian morality, western values, etc. and challenged socialism, Islamism, and many left-wing policies that conflict with traditional American values openly in public debates on college campuses. He saw a sharp political divide among Americans which was on it's way toward civil war and he believed "When people stop talking, that's when you get violence". Colleges were originally established to promote public debate and the exchange of ideas. So under the impress that is which colleges are meant to be used, Charlie used them as a vehicle for debate within the Republic. The left wing doesn't believe in the idea of college though, they only believe in death.

Cal4576 · Answer

I would never wish anyone dead. His murder is appalling.
I do fundamentally disagree with his world view and politics. The trouble with people like kirk (and farage here in the uk) is that they deliberately skirt the edge of the extreme (hey X would be a bad thing, but if you look at it -insert arguments for how X would work- but yeah it's bad) by doing this they make the extreme feel more legitimised in their extreme views and they make the subjects they are discussing seem more mainstream.
I also disagree with the view that he was a good debater. There are a lot of very intelligent well reasoned young people in America that his team would bar from entering events he was at. If he had lost a debate to them previously or had prior knowledge about them he would just refuse

bunnyboo24 · Answer

No he was a male that was for Guns and publicaly stated its a human right evan with the shootings that come with it and then he became one of them..

Some of his opinions were based of lies for example George Floyds death. He made up he didn't die from murder evan though if you look at the original autopsy he died from trauma to the neck.. so yeah he lied about many things but some things he said was true and good. He was a public figure so attention is more important than honesty.. otherwise he wouldn't have made a living

D_Bone_Steak · Answer

Charlie Kirk was nothing more to me than "see, they want to kill anyone that disagrees" to me. I've seen him, shook hands in passing but never thought much of the guy. I thought he was a "prove me wrong" rip off of Steven Crowder before he got murdered. What aligns people like me to him as that the left just want to kill our kind. I want abortions... I'm full Nazi with abortions too. I actually agree with the Nazi feminists on that issue... meanwhile I'll get meat packed by the left as having nothing in common. Then they wonder why I vote Trump for the 3rd term.

WonderingManII · Answer

As a Bible Believing Christian, who isn't very political. The Charlie Kirk, and MAGA stuff is very confusing. I was watching videos on youtube to try and figure out Charlie Kirk. Trying to determine if He truly was a good guy or not. What I found was a mix bag of stuff. I doubt that most people on GAG would know anything about N. A. R. or the Seven Mountain Mandate. I am not in favor or the N. A. R. stuff or the Seven Mountain Mandate. But Charlie Kirk was talking to a N. A. R. leader who introduced him to the Seven Mountain Mandate. I don't know what kind of understanding Charlie had about it, but it was clear in the video that He thought it was a good thing. It's not a good thing, in my opinion. Yet Charlie Kirk did say a lot of things that I agree with. I just leave it at that.

NoDecision · Answer

I would say he was a pretty smart cookie with a fast wit. It was sad that some madman had to end his career and life.

LunarEclipse433 · Answer

It could be if you think that way. Charlie Kirk asked and answered questions with facts to make people think. Some people argue with facts that are wrong. Some people get something in their head and refuse to listen to any other way of thinking about a problem. You want to shut somebody down, answer them with cold hard facts. Adults will listen to information and make up their own minds not influenced by others or politics. Is one side always right, of course not. A smart person will rethink their decisions when presented with cold hard facts. Opinions however may or may not ever be agreed upon because there may not be factual evidence yet to prove up either side.

Joshydavid25 · Answer

No, he was just a guy who ran a successful organization, and also just wanted to have an opened discussion with college students.. He was reasonably popular when he was alive, but because he was simply a political commentator when he was murdered, his death was one of the more effective ones in a long time.. It made him extremely well known..

Anonymous · Answer

Kind of but no. the republicans aka MAGA are big on free speech, religion and Gun rights. If you listen to to some of his videos he talks about some of these topics but he never started the conversion he let other start it. His death woke a lot of people up since you had people celebrating his death which is pure evil even if you didn't agree with him.

loveslongnails · Answer

He was an old maga thing. Same hate, different hat. He was a white supremacist claiming to be a Christian. It's an old, old playbook.

DonaldDarko · Answer

Charly Kirk is a right wing populist so is MAGA it's pretty much the same thing. In fact right wing populism is spreading across the world. People blame Trump for it but he's a bit player. It's more a turning of history.

Lliam · Answer

Maybe. He certainly seemed to resonate with right-wing Christians and red pillers.

Anonymous · Answer

New MAGA thing? You realize Kirk has been dead for more than a month now, right?

But even before his death Kirk had been a thing for more than a decade. He founded Turning Point in 2012 and has been a powerful force in starting and accelerating the conservative movement we see taking over the US and the entire world today, and he played a big role in getting Trump reelected.

And now the insidious mind virus that is wokeness is dying. We owe Kirk a lot.

Anonymous · Answer

He was a popular right wing political commentator who was assassinated by some piece of shit leftist shit stain.

This is what the left does in the US. They Riot, They assassinate, They murder, they destroy. All Charlie did was try to have a conversation, and they killed him for it. I stand against anyone who believes violence is the answer.

molonski2 · Answer

Charlie Kirk was a wonderful man , taken in the prime of his life by a pathetic moron , he was all about free speech and reasoned , intelligent debate. A wonderful human being RIP Charlie.

Anonymous · Answer

i don't know. is the murder of Charlie Kirk some kind of anti-Trump thing? I've never seen so many people cream their jeans over their joy of an actual murder before. Do y'all actually celebrate this murder, or is it just because he was a "Trump supporter" and by default, you're forced to hate everything on Trump's side of things? Because either way, it's fucking sick.

Anonymous · Answer

I don’t have evidence to prove this but I have this feeling Charlie Kirk most likely didn’t post online the debates he lost. He only posted the videos that made himself look good and smart

Bricealan · Answer

@kelly6 I had not heard of him prior to his horrific murder, which is really horrifying to think about. Not sure what you mean by 'a new MAGA thing" ?

Twalli · Answer

I honestly find it abhorrent that MAGA is using his assassination as their justification for declaring war on liberals.

exitseven · Answer

He was not new. He has been doing his part for a few years. He was a integral part in President Trumps re-election.

ProbablyClueless · Answer

No, not new at all. He had been politically and publicly active on social media for the better part of a decade.

Quigly · Answer

Nope

As a MAGA Conservative, Charlie Kirk was more Moderate than MAGA.

What happened to Charlie Kirk is certainly an example of what MAGA has always been against. The Lunatic left is certainly nothing new.

ohsheeT · Answer

What ever he was he is no more. or they could have pulled an Elvis

jshm2 · Answer

Pretty much, he's crack for the maga crowd.

genericname85 · Answer

no he's not new at all. he's been around in the conservative bubble for a long time.

Anonymous · Answer

no. Charlie Kirk has been around since he started TPUSA at 18 years old

Filthy_Immigrant · Answer

yeah, just like George Floyd was a "liberal thing"

Anonymous · Answer

Nah, he's been about for a decade but he was collapsing the liberal indoctrination cells of colleges and they took him out for it

Snakeyes7 · Answer

He's been a MAGA thing before it was even called MAGA.

shortster · Answer

Charlie was a predominant political influencer who also was a major Trump supporter.

FreyaRed · Answer

I think Kirk's death hype is over.

Anonymous · Answer

No. He's been a conservative speaker/debater for years. It's not new at all.

Anonymous · Answer

I wouldn't say that. He worked mostly with college-age students. He was popular among conservatives on college campuses. He held open debates with anyone in front of thousands of people.

Butterfly38142 · Answer

He is very annoying

Unycorn · Answer

What is  Maga?

DrPepper12 · Answer

No. Just the latest grifter.

Extraterrestrial1999 · Answer

I don't get the fascination with him tbh

msc545 · Answer

No, he is a dead MAGA guy. RIP i guess.

beefcakebradybatson · Answer

KKKUCKKK FIKKK!!!

OddBeMe · Answer

They always fawn over the christ story

RedInnocent69 · Answer

Not exactly new, but, yeah

seeyounexttuesday · Answer

No. Charlie Kirk helped get Trump elected.

DamianBlk · Answer

What do you mean by that, violent lefty?

Dargil · Answer

Moron.

Grond21 · Answer

No. He's an original

Bklynbadboy12 · Answer

He's a moron

FenixG45 · Answer

I. Hope. NOT.!

Is Charlie Kirk some new MAGA thing?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Is Charlie Kirk some new MAGA thing?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.