Do you think this aged well?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

He has serious Obama Derangement Syndrome. There is no one person on Earth more obsessed with another than Trump is with Obama. His jealousy about Obama's popularity and his Nobel Peace prize knows no end.

[Anonymous]

This video below and that post you posted both aged like milk. Obama never started a war in Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/jFRTZGgmGo4

[Opinion Owner]

It seems like Trump is describing himself in that video.

[madhatters4]

i love that for almost every Trump action that he swears he is doing for some good there is a documented example exposing him as a fraud. And yet somehow millions of people never connect those dots

[madhatters4]

thanks for MHO!

[DryGermanGuy]

It's hilarious, especially because he made that claim four or five times about Obama alone. Plus, he told his naive voters that H. Clinton and K. Harris would start wars as well.

[Shiprex]

As with everything about this clown, it's another projection because he is well and truly in hock to Putin and Netanyahoo

[msc545]

Yeah, well Trump talks crazy shit all the time. This is just more of it.

[qwerty2469]

It did not, and it was stupid when he said it all the way back then. Obama was funding terrorism through Iran. They were buds.

[beefcakebradybatson]

And you're high, pal !!!

[qwerty2469]

So your saying Obama didn't give Iran $1.7 billion in cash to Iran in January 2016. Even though you can Google it. I think you are worse than hi, I think you are a brain washed idiot

[goaded]

Returning Iran's money the US had been holding on to in exchange for a deal where they couldn't have a nuclear weapons program was a good deal.

Trump spends more than that every two days of his war of choice.

[888theGreat]

Well Trump can't say that. He is done in 3 more years. If the country survives 3 more years.

[LC75LC71]

No, unfortunately twitter is still around..

[exitseven]

Too funny

[Asker]

It's hilarious! Trump is such an idiot. He just says anything because his base could care less if he's consistent or not...

[exitseven]

I. m thinking that Trump will get Republicans reelected with this war.

[Asker]

Not what polls are showing...

[exitseven]

52"% Of all Areicans approve this was yesterday Also democrats are polling lower than ICE

[Asker]

That's just the Fox News poll... Meanwhile... About half of registered voters — 53% — oppose U. S. military action against Iran, according to a new Quinnipiac Poll conducted over the weekend. Only 4 in 10 support it, and about 1 in 10 are uncertain.

That's similar to the results of text message snap polls from The Washington Post and CNN, both conducted shortly after the joint U. S.-Israel attacks began, which also indicated that more Americans rejected the military action than embraced it. Democrats are already winning elections in deep red places where Trump won by double digits... MAGATS are already having bar fights amongst themselves over the Epstein Files and economic turmoil. Trump stopped boasting about gas prices... and the market is standing on shaky ground because too many are believing Trump's lies that the war will be over "very quickly."

[exitseven]

I would believe the Fox news poll before Quinnaoeac.

[goaded]

"About 60 percent of Americans disapproved of the attacks, according to a CNN poll conducted immediately after the strikes. Two other polls, by Reuters/Ipsos and The Washington Post, had similar results."
www.documentcloud.org/.../
www.ipsos.com/.../...ke%20Topline%203.1.2026_0.pdf
www.washingtonpost.com/.../

"A Fox News poll, also taken in the days after the initial strike, showed Americans evenly split on the attacks. The results may have been influenced, though, by the placement of the prompt after a number of questions about the conflict."
www.nytimes.com/.../...-us-war-military-polls.html

Rasmussen is just taking the mickey. Talk about misleading the respondents!

"1* President Trump ordered the U. S. military to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons program and ballistic missile capabilities. Do you approve or disapprove of the decision to attack Iran?"

Of course you get more people voting for war if you imply there was an advanced nuclear weapons program and ballistic missile capabilities capable of reaching the US!