Are women more easily triggered?

[MerakSahibi]

Typical

On social media, I've had plenty of arguments with other men that even involved insults, yet later we ended up becoming homie. In contrast, I've been blocked by women I've never met, talked to, or interacted with in any way. Are women more easily triggered, or are men simply more friendly and willing to get along afterward?

Yes

No

[capriVib]

If we evaluate it based on real-world observations, I think there is some truth to what you're saying. Especially on social media, it often appears more common to see women quickly blocking people, getting offended, or responding aggressively. I'm sure many men have experienced situations where a woman blocks them despite barely interacting with them, or even after simply seeing one of their posts.

Even here on GAG, I can't think of a single man who has blocked me, while every person who has blocked me has been a woman. One woman even blocked me because I had a profile photo. I'm not counting nationality-based blocks, of course.

At first, I couldn't understand why some women blocked so easily, but over time I stopped caring. In fact, I now see it as a good thing. If someone is so easily triggered that they feel the need to block me, they're probably saving both of us time. So, from my perspective, they're actually making things easier, and I appreciate that.

I also feel that, in everyday life and in the workplace, women seem more likely to become upset or irritated over certain issues. That's simply been my personal observation and experience.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

It's their way of putting you in the ick zone. Foids block me less now that I put my height in my bio (it's 6'4''). If you treat women as fickle beasts they prefer you for it.

[MerakSahibi]

@Wodens_Apprentice Dude, if I write my height, I'll probably get blocked even more

[capriVib]

By the way, I’m learning new concepts like “ick zone” thanks. When I looked it up, it really clicked in my head. 😂

[Wodens_Apprentice]

@capriVib Men rarely get the ick because we're not fickle enough to let a poorly worded comment destroy your chance with us.
Women are fickle, unprincipled and expect men to mind read their emotional driven animal brains.
Bring back arranged marriage.

[capriVib]

@Wodens_Apprentice

I can kind of see your point. Sometimes it feels like women expect men to figure out their feelings and problems without them saying anything directly. It's a bit like a veterinarian trying to understand what's wrong with an animal that can't explain itself. For socially awkward or autistic men, this can make dating and communication much harder.

And arranged marriage huh? 😂 It's especially funny hearing that from someone in the UK. I live in a conservative part of Turkey, and even here arranged marriages are becoming pretty rare.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

@capriVib The West needs to sacrifice all of our liberal values making us weak.
Women are only really turned on if you act like the creepy pervert they complain about so often, because if she doesn't find him ugly then suddenly it's just flirting.
Otherwise you're invisible to them

[Wodens_Apprentice]

Yes absolutely. Women are fucking annoying.

Ladies! Shut the fuck up before I kidnap you & chain you to my kitchen.

[Kvass]

Wait until you see princess men from your country who get triggered when nobody calls them white

[MerakSahibi]

Haha, that's just a small minority with an inferiority complex, a legacy of the Tanzimat mindset. Most Turks would proudly call themselves 'Kara Boğa' (Black Bull) rather than obsessing over being called white

[Kvass]

Nice joke, Mehmet.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

You didn't respond to his question. So you proved him right.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

@MerakSahibi You Turks are Semitic Mongolians.

[MerakSahibi]

@Wodens_Apprentice www.reddit.com/media

[MerakSahibi]

@Wodens_Apprentice Turks are genetically diverse. In Central Asia, they mixed with Sogdians; in Iran, with Persians; and in Anatolia, with Greeks. Semitic ancestry is less common than many people think, and it is not even particularly high among Syrians. As for me, I am of Georgian descent

[MerakSahibi]

Actually Greek isn't true, we can call native anatolians

[Wodens_Apprentice]

So you're not true Turks. Also what does the genetic study mean by "Anatolian?" That means they could be measuring any mixture of things.
There was no historical culture, nation or group named Anatolian, as it's a geographic term.
The ethnic background of Anatolia is made up of Hittite descended people, Isaurians, Bithynians, Pontic people, Galatians (Celtic people that arrived from Europe), Phrygians (who belonged to a European ethnic group related to the Thracians & Dacians) & early Greeks (Bronze age Mycenaeans and Trojans) & later Greek colonists, aswell as a Macedonian elite.
The Turks came in and swept out these, by then Romanised groups with the usual dominance & breeding competition that Muslims play against those they invade.
You don't proselytise to spread your region, you dominate others, make them pay a jizya tax and turn them into weak servile minorities.
That's the exact same thing the Arabs did across the middle east and is why you still have Christians in the middle east and still have Christians "Romaois" in Turkey that don't speak Arabic or Turkic.

[MerakSahibi]

@Wodens_Apprentice I had written the text as a translation, but the AI used "Greek" instead of "Rum." Turks along the Black Sea coast carry Pontic ancestry, those in the Marmara region mixed with the people of Bithynia, and those in Teke with the Lycians. In reality, Hellenic Greeks were mainly found along the coast of İzmir. The rest of the population became Greek-speaking because Greek was the state language during the Roman period, but their genetics largely remained the same. The Macedonians did not leave a major genetic impact either, since there is little difference between Bronze Age samples and those from later periods.

You, too, arrived as Anglo-Saxons, but how Germanic is your ancestry today? You mixed with the Brythonic and Celtic peoples already living on the island, and later came the Norman conquest. I've even heard people say that's why eastern Britain tends to be blonder while western Britain tends to be darker-haired, though I don't know how accurate that is

[Wodens_Apprentice]

The Celtic & Roman people along the Eastern coast of England were either killed, enslaved or pushed west. It's mostly the western coast of England with mixed ancestry as some of the Pagan Celts actually supported the Anglo-Saxon invaders against their Christian kin who had been oppressing them with theocracy (not fond of abrahamic religions for this). The evidence for this is the King Cerdic who was a founder of Wessex but his name heavily suggests he was born a Celt named Caradog.
Where I live (north west) remained a fairly Romanised (but celt speaking) pagan Kingdom known as Rheged whose legendary ruler died to betrayal when he almost pushed all the Angles out the North.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

His Kingdom was carved up by Æthelfrith, a pagan warlord who Celtic sources remember in terror as "Æthelfrith the Twister". Æthelfrith united Bernicia (Edinburgh and Lindisfarne) with Deira (York) and became a Bretwalda ("Britain ruler" a sort of high kingship) until Rædwald kills him (he's one of the best historical examples of Christo-Pagan syncretism rather than belonging to one religion).
The English are more Germanic then anything else as our ancestry exploded from sea fairing settlers of Saxon, Jute & Angle ancestry who settled Northern Germany & France before arriving. The Celtic ancestry would come from the Normans suppressing us into servile peasants & forcing us to mix with the local Celts.
More strong evidence that mixing was rare with the Anglo Saxons themselves is that there was a English group called the "Gyrwas". The lived in south east marshes of England yet their name resembles Welsh. The local monasteries there reported the locals talking like demons unusually, so this would suggest that even some of the most assimilated of the Celts in Eastern England were still distinguished.
The Normans barely left a genetic impact because their ancestry was already pretty damn similar to English ancestry to begin with. The Celts that lives in England such as the Parisii (from Paris to hull) and the Belgae (a tribe in descended from Belgic Celt tribes) already came from these areas.
The genetic differences between a Germanic and a Celt aren't as far as the Genetic difference between "Anatolians" and Turks, who originated from Mongolia.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

Also lots of the Celts were described as blonde by the Romans. The darker hair tends to be more Cornwall and Southern Wales because of their Atlantic trade routes to Spain.

[msc545]

Women are much more easily upset by minor things than men are.

[strateguy632]

no but they cry easier.

[exitseven]

Yes, especially at a certain time of the month.

[_Jenny_]

@MerakSahibi 50/50

[Wodens_Apprentice]

You know that's a lie.

[_Jenny_]

@Wodens_Apprentice is it?

[Wodens_Apprentice]

@_jenny_
Why do women rage and block us men over a difference of opinion all the time?

[_Jenny_]

@Wodens_Apprentice not all of us block men

[Wodens_Apprentice]

@_jenny_
No but it's definitely not 50/50. How many men have blocked you?

[_Jenny_]

@Wodens_Apprentice I blocked one person and I unblocked the person a week later

[Wodens_Apprentice]

And how many men have blocked you? That was what I intended to ask originally but my brain must've melted when typing.

[_Jenny_]

@Wodens_Apprentice I don’t know, just yesterday a person said go away and don’t reply to any of their posts

[_Jenny_]

People really don’t like me

[Mike_Hum]

Social media has broken their brains.

[Wodens_Apprentice]

#EnslaveFoids

[Mike_Hum]

@Wodens_Apprentice wtf is that?

[KostasKouvalis]

From my experience and observations, yes.