Are there still real men?

[Mollyruiz]

[Curmudgeon]

We have gone "on strike":

https://www.youtube.com/embed/GWPMC6cV7Hohttps://www.youtube.com/embed/rlvMAS_20K4

[msc545]

Both are very good in informative videos. Thank you.

[Curmudgeon]

@msc545 My favorite quote came from Men's Right's Advocate Karen Straughn (NO, she's NOT that kind of "Karen" :D ) toward the end of her video.

The attempt to shame men into doing what society wants (and we blatantly see this same kind of shaming from the female OP who made this post)

""*isn't* going to work this time. Because while it's possible to shame a man into giving his life for his country, if there is a promise of respect in it, it's impossible to shame someone, into working his ass off and risking his whole future, just for the joy of looking in the mirror and seeing ((the approved and very negative male identity archetypes the femoid society has today, like)) "Homer Simpson", or "Ray Barone", or "Dilbert", looking back at him. When the cost of society's approval is the self-respect you derive from a positive identity, it ceases to be worth it to a lot of men.""

[Taranis_Thunor]

Yes but now you're in your late 30's you missed your chance to get any. Female attractiveness & body clock tanks fast.

Maybe you should've settled for the nice guy instead of spreading your legs for Chad only to found out there's a bigger pool of princesses for him to choose from then you had simps to choose from (and likely rejected all of them lol).

It's a woman entitlement problem, not men.

[Tamera952]

Uh oh, is this the ‘genital checks’ I heard were coming? Men are gonna have their bulges examined now? lol…. this aught to be fun.

[GothEgg]

Yes there still are. The best ones tend to be taken.

[Taranis_Thunor]

And vice versa 😩

[lightbulb27]

Define that. I see people I see as real men, but what do you think they are? I met one around your age... about 10yrs ago.

Most males are not strong enough...

[OneViewpoint]

No, we all went virtual last night at 11PM Eastern standard time. What you are interacting with are simulations projected as a 3D hologram.

[Lesbologist]

No we all left, don't want anything to do with you.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

I heard that Diogenes asked a similar question 2.000 years ago, yet I can't remember if he found an answer

[HighValue]

They're too busy avoiding all the low quality women.

[abc3643]

Of course! How do you think real women get real pregnant?

[slatyb]

No, all the real men died in the plague of 2019. The people who look like men are all trans.

[loveslongnails]

Now's your chance to tell us all exactly what a "real man" is, Molly. Please update.

[Anonymous]

What makes somebody a real man according to you?

[msc545]

Yes there are but not the ones that you're interested in

[msc545]

I forgot to add that no real man with an ounce of brains wants to take the financial and legal risk of interacting with women on an ongoing basis. It just isn't safe. Women have managed to manipulate the legal system to their great advantage except that it really isn't to their advantage because again men want nothing to do with that level of risk and rightfully so.

[DarKnight36]

There is no such thing as a handsome man; there are only strong men :) And we are still here.

[Pterodon]

Good question what with all these trans things running around

[Anonymous]

As many as there are still, "real women".

[NathanDavis]

I'm actually a very smart chair...

[lilBigPotato]

What is a real man an who decides that? 🤔

[Still-alive]

Pac man probably has a stake in manhood lol

[queenofcardio]

They're around

[Still-alive]

Sometimes we’re square :p

[LazerBean]

Yep, they're out there

[DonaldDarko]

Attend some Trump rallys.

[Shiprex]

Yes all over but they don't trust women.

[leahzrc]

They are hiding from us all

[TonyMetal___1986]

How come, i'm always here 😄

[Agape93]

Yeah. Dont be retarded.

[Mariogirl09]

No... they are all taken

[TonyMetal___1986]

Not true...

[Taranis_Thunor]

Maybe you shouldn't have been taken when it comes to normal men and your entitled attitude wouldn't have led to loneliness.

[Mariogirl09]

@Taranis_Thunor shit up barney

[Taranis_Thunor]

@Mariogirl09
Silence foid.

[exitseven]

Yes, but they are all at least 50 years old

[Taranis_Thunor]

You boomers & gen x are even bigger women then women themselves.

[TonyMetal___1986]

Yes ofc, i know that i am 😌

[Cidknee]

Yeah, last I checked.

[FrodoSkywalker007]

We live in a simulation

[Kelly6]

@Mollyruiz They all left to Mars. Lol

[TonyMetal___1986]

Nope, i'm still here hehe

[Kelly6]

@TonyMetal___1986
Maybe lost your ticket lol

[TonyMetal___1986]

Threw it away cause i wanna stay here 😂

[Kelly6]

@TonyMetal___1986 immature decision lol 😆

[4ngelic]

Well duh

[Abbycado]

Yeah.

[MrChinaski]

I'm here.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

Nope

[Taranis_Thunor]

Yeah and there's no real women either. All of you lot want to pursue careers and have parties until you're 30 year old roasties.
Then all of the men worth anything to you won't even consider you. Maybe you shouldn't have elevated your standards by using the internet to have a swarm of simps chasing after you and you'd realise the men out of your league only see you as the one night stand.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor It's honestly concerning how u seem to believe that a woman's life loses its value simply cuz she chooses to focus on her career, enjoy her youth, or refuses to settle down before she's ready. u talk about women as if they're products with an expiration date, and then wonder why so many of them have standards. A woman doesn't exist solely to be attractive to men, get married, or spend her entire life trying to remain desirable to someone who sees her as replaceable.
u also seem to confuse attention with genuine value. Having men chase after u on the internet doesn't automatically mean someone has unrealistic standards, just as having very few people interested in u doesn't automatically make u humble or realistic. Attention is not the same as love, and popularity is not the same as compatibility. most importantly, a woman's worth isn't determined by how many men want her, how young she is, or whether a particular man considers her worthy of a relationship

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor And let's talk abtt your argument about men being ‘out of women's leagues.’ Who exactly decides these leagues? u make it sound as though men are the judges and women are contestants who must prove they're worthy of being chosen. Relationships aren't a competition in which one gender gets to rank the other. People have different preferences, values, personalities, and expectations. Someone rejecting you doesn't make you inferior, and someone desiring you doesn't automatically make them superior.
There's also nothing wrong with wanting a career, travelling, going to parties, or enjoying your twenties. Those experiences don't prevent someone from becoming a loving partner or a good spouse later in life. Ppll can grow, mature, and change their priorities. In fact, learning who you are before committing to someone can help you build a healthier relationship. Why should a woman rush into marriage out of fear that she'll become undesirable at thirty? If a relationship is only available to her while she's young enough to satisfy someone's preferences, perhaps that relationship isn't as valuable as u think.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor u keep talking about women being used for one night stands as though that's proof that women are the problem. If a man deliberately misleads a woman about his intentions, that's a reflection of his own choices, not evidence that all women have inflated standards. Adults are responsible for communicating honestly and respecting each other's boundaries. u cannot blame an entire gender for the behaviour of individuals

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor You're entitled to your preferences, just as women are entitled to theirs. But having preferences is one thing treating half the population as worthless because they don't organise their lives around your expectations is another. u don't have to agree with every woman's choices, but u should at least understand that women are individuals with their own ambitions, experiences, and definitions of happiness. A woman's life isn't a failed investment js cuz she doesn't spend it trying to become the kind of woman u personally wanna

[Taranis_Thunor]

"It's honestly concerning how u seem to believe that a woman's life loses its value simply cuz she chooses to focus on her career, enjoy her youth, or refuses to settle down before she's ready" is that any less concerning then you thinking there's no real men left? At least I am a real man so therefore I'm not gonna be a doormat for women like the rest of the "men" you're familiar with in your life and don't consider to be real men.
" they're products with an expiration date" just like it's a sad fact of reality that short men aren't attractive & that women get the ick from virgin's & autists, men like to start the relationship with their woman whilst she's still young & beautiful. His instincts tell him this so he can pass down good genetics & have more children with her.
"A woman doesn't exist solely to be attractive to men, get married, or spend her entire life trying to remain desirable to someone who sees her as replaceable." Yes she does because as humans most of our validation comes from how the opposite sex perceived us, as much as you might try to deny it.

[Taranis_Thunor]

She doesn't have to be replaceable if she's a good loving wife her husband will love her back like she's the best thing in the world, even once she gets old & less sexually attractive. True love develops after the attraction phase.
I'm not saying women shouldn't have standards I am saying women have become narcissistic because of all the simps online stroking their ego and raising their standards to only like men who will end up cheating on them because he can afford to just view her as a one night stand (and ha ha ha extremely deserved, considering how you women laugh at the incels).
"Attention is not the same as love, and popularity is not the same as compatibility. " This is a naive typical way of viewing things but it's not correct. You underestimate how fickle humans & yourself likely are. We're animals not fictional fairy-like creatures (though we'd be better off if we were). The ideals don't match our instincts.

[Taranis_Thunor]

"a woman's worth isn't determined by how many men want her, how young she is, or whether a particular man considers her worthy of a relationship" It kinda is because for we do evaluate our own sense of worth by how the opposite sex views us. This is why if so many women (and men) are insecure about their appearance no matter how much they tell themselves their worth is in higher abstract concepts like philosophy and art.
"Who exactly decides these leagues" Instincts do because instincts lead humans to try & find the best genetics, both physical and psychological traits, they can get so they can breed better offspring.
"u make it sound as though men are the judges and women are contestants who must prove they're worthy of being chosen" Oh no, I fucking wish! HA HA HA ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND. The world would be so much better if that's how the selection process works but it's actually the opposite. This is why men tend to be more realistic because the very natural process I'm talking about is very real for men whereas nobody sympathises with men over his.
Certainly not you because of he so much as cares he's too insecure to be a real man to begin with, which proves my point further and your argument that there's no real men has been more based in reality then these copes honestly, which is why I didn't say you were wrong.
"People have different preferences, values, personalities, and expectations. " Only slightly different. Most men want the same women and most women want the same men. It's pretty consistent. There's some odd degeneracies like men acting desiring stupid women & women desiring rapey men (their 🍇 fetish blackpilled me as it's more common then you'd think) as long as he looks handsome of course (otherwise she's calling the police).

[Taranis_Thunor]

"Someone rejecting you doesn't make you inferior, and someone desiring you doesn't automatically make them superior." Men are constantly rejected all the time. Women not so much. The men who aren't rejected constantly are taller (like me 🗿 too bad I'm too autistic for women), stronger & more intelligent (as long as it's not autistically intelligent) because that's what women are attracted to. So yeah people are gonna feel inferior if they don't meet those standards because objectively they are the people who'd go extinct first.
"There's also nothing wrong with wanting a career, travelling, going to parties, or enjoying your twenties." Yes there is. Only women really get to enjoy this as it's not enjoyable for men to constantly go to parties to get a hook up, rejected most of the time for these slags.
Parties are full of mischievous degenerates & normies (normies are evil). It's just a waste of time for a cheap dopamine hit & isn't very romantic. The women who persue these lifestyles often end up in their 30s once they decide to settle & have children. This means their fertility has dropped, a higher chance of their children being cursed with autism (wouldn't be a bad thing but women hate us autists, but I assume this study meant lower functioning autism which shouldn't be called the same thing) and genetic defects, aswell as less time to produce more children (white people barely produce any children and those selfish boomers need their pension, so they'll import 3rd world populations to replace their own ethnicity with outside barbarians & groomers).
"Those experiences don't prevent someone from becoming a loving partner or a good spouse later in life" They actually do because the woman will have got to enjoy so many men that her dopamine receptors will be fried from all the sex she's had & her lady parts will be damaged & less pleasurable for men (apparently).

[Taranis_Thunor]

Not just that but it's a unfortunate fact for women that men do not find women who've slept with loads of other men as appealing. She might be sexy but if she's slept with loads of other men, she'll be less attached emotionally and you're having to compete with the dick size, dominance (which as it turns out men enjoy doing dominance LESS then women like receiving it), wealth (not just gold diggers like competent career men) and general handsomeness of all the men she's slept with in the past. That's a very hard standard for men to meet and if he isn't absolutely perfect for her he's just gonna be her emotional support 2nd's she decided to settle with later in life then the true Prince Charming she desires.
"Ppll can grow, mature, and change their priorities." Yeah in other words they realise later in life they wasted their time with the parties, don't find fulfilment out of it then try to settle down later. That's usually what happens thanks to feminism.

[Taranis_Thunor]

"u cannot blame an entire gender for the behaviour of individuals" You mean like you just did before saying there's no decent men left anymore but when I point out there's no decent women left anymore because they only decide to become decent in their mid 30's suddenly that's unfair? If my traditional ideals were the norm in society there's be plenty of really good men & women but those times are over.
"ambitions, experiences, and definitions of happiness" yeah and these ambitions and preferences are what causes women to become old sad cat lady hags who become bitter spiteful feminists who joke about white babies dying & support late term abortions because they hate seeing other more traditional, younger & prettier women being happy with their children. These older childless hags descend from millions of years of ancestry (going back to when we were little fish in the sea) yet suddenly their lineage ends with them because they chose to live a godless party & excitement chasing lifestyle that has no meaning, so then they die, turn into dirt & have no impact on reality anymore (if you don't believe in a divinity like I do, having children is the closest you're getting to an afterlife anyway).
"kind of woman u personally wanna"
I'm not advocating my preference I'm advocating healthy traditional family unit.
I would be attracted to a female version of myself honestly because having narcissistic taste is based 😎. There's no women like me though.
Plenty of studies show people are more attracted to people who look & act like themselves.

[Taranis_Thunor]

Also you're 19 so what I'm saying is solid advice don't listen to these older bitter women who would judge you for staying at home. There's nothing wrong with being a stay at home mother they contribute to civilisation more then modern feminist women do.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor Bro, your entire argument is built on double standards, baseless assumptions, and personal bias disguised as biology. I honestly don't wanna deal with u or waste my time on this. I skimmed through some of those paragraphs u wrote, and honestly, u wasted your time writing all that because none of it was worth taking seriously. u wrote all that just to repeat the same weak points over and over again. I could write an entire essay dismantling your arguments, but you're clearly not worth the effort. I'm not wasting my time explaining basic logic to someone who's determined not to understand it. I have better things to do than read endless paragraphs full of the same recycled nonsense. my fingers deserve better than this shit.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor Writing a whole essay doesn't make u right, bro. It just shows you're talking a whole lot of nonsense

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor Keep going, bro, Every reply makes it clearer that u have nothing worthwhile to say🥰😘🤪😝

[Taranis_Thunor]

"could write an entire essay dismantling your arguments" No you couldn't because otherwise you would've provided evidence but you didn't you're just stating I'm wrong and I'm backing up what I'm saying with evidence & social studies.
You're clearly just mad and admitted you didn't even read my argument properly so why should I take your reply as a valid from here on?
The reason I repeat statements is because the same truth can be used as evidence against different presumptive & false arguments you are making. You skimmed me, I didn't skim you so my argument is likely more refined because I was listening and you can't even be bothered to do that.
Go and spend your 20's getting drunk and pulverised by all the Chad's then but don't start bitching about it when we men find you disgusting because you've become a soulless piece of broken goods and your fanny looks like a roast butty 🤮
Good men with morals & dignity don't marry with desensitised hoes, so I hope you become a desensitised hoe so you get locked out of your happily ever after.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor Bro, you went from claiming you have evidence and social studies to insulting women's bodies, reducing them to ‘broken goods,’ and wishing them an unhappy future. Do you seriously not see how that undermines your entire argument? If your position is so well-supported, why are you resorting to personal insults instead of addressing the actual points? A woman's worth isn't determined by her sexual history, and marriage isn't some reward that men get to grant or withhold based on their personal preferences. You can call women whatever you want, but that doesn't turn your prejudices into facts. And don't confuse me refusing to waste my time arguing with you for admitting defeat. I simply don't owe you endless explanations, especially when you choose to respond with misogyny instead of a mature argument

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor the fact that you had to write paragraphs about women's bodies and sexual history just to feel superior says more about you than it ever will about women. You keep talking about morals, yet your entire argument falls apart the moment you start insulting people. I'm not intimidated by your opinions, and I'm certainly not impressed by your attempt to sound intellectually superior.

[Taranis_Thunor]

I wished you an unhappy future because you were rude to me and because I read you're a Turk so decided to start hurling thunder bolts at you like Jupiter.
"A woman's worth isn't determined by her sexual history," you tell yourself that but ask any man & press them on the details. It's us men who decide womens worth just like you women who decide you're worth but apparently me being a man with male instincts isn't enough for you to accept, so why don't you prove me wrong? You could even just copy and paste everything in saying and ask AI if it's really just unfounded nonsense with no source, logic or reasoning beyond me being selfish (I already admitted the tradition I'm promoting isn't a projection of my interests anyway because nobody is perfect).
"marriage isn't some reward that men get to grant or withhold based on their personal preferences. " Yes it is because women desire a confession & marriage out of their men, so therefore we gatekeep it. Just like you women have what we want (sex) so women are the gatekeepers of which men get to have sex (that's until we suddenly you don't have human rights anymore at least, which your savage nomadic ancestry certainly didn't believe).

[Taranis_Thunor]

You insulted all men and also I am intellectually superior because I study history a lot. I even studied how the Turks used to rip people apart, trample them under horses, murder all of their baby brothers to inherit the Sultanate & how they used to slave raid Russian women & turn them into rape wives so it's funny seeing you lecturing me, a westerner who has to actually put up with feminism, on this.
Kazakhstan (your turk brothers) has some pretty based marriage customs though.

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor First of all, what does my being Turkish have to do with this argument? u literally wished me an unhappy future cuz of my nationality, then tried to justify it with some ridiculous comparison to Jupiter. u claim to value logic and morality, yet you're letting personal resentment dictate how u treat people.
Being a man doesn't give u special authority over women's worth, and calling your opinions “biology,” “instinct,” or “tradition” doesn't automatically make them facts. If your arguments are as strong as you claim, defend them with evidence instead of insults about women's bodies, sexual history, or nationality. My nationality isn't an argument, and your prejudice doesn't make you right

[s0j7e3zyxc8v0]

@Taranis_Thunor And who the f! ck do u think u are, u arro!!! gant so!!! n of a bit!!! ch, talking sht about Turks like you're somehow better than us? u read a few history books and suddenly think you're entitled to look down on an entire nation? Ge! t the fc! k over yourself. Your superiority complex is embarrassing, and your so called intellectual superiority clearly hasn't taught you basic respect keep your condescending bullshit to yourself. the moment u start disrespecting my nationality, don't expect me to sit here and tolerate your ignor!!! ant as!!! s

[Taranis_Thunor]

"morality, yet you're letting personal resentment dictate how u treat people." Hey my morality is closer to the morality to your Tengri & less Abrahamic (wait, you know who Tengri is right?)
"Being a man doesn't give u special authority over women's worth" You need to argue with all of the Islamic scholars in the middle east because they're clearly not spreading the faith right then. Infact I hope Turks do embrace feminism 😉 whilst we return to tradition back here in Europe. You'll find out one day just you should hope you find out before it's too late. Time is ticking ⏰
"Being a man doesn't give u special authority over women's worth, and calling your opinions “biology,” “instinct,” or “tradition” doesn't automatically make them facts" you know what I'm saying is true instinctively otherwise you wouldn't have gotten triggered. Instead you're trying to rationalise out of it probably because feminism offered you an alternative to the oppressive religion which you were born into, which is understandable.
Also just look into what I'm saying and you'll find plenty of evidence for it. I'm not writing an actual essay for you I'm having an online debate in an era where you can just ask AI to fact check me.

[Taranis_Thunor]

"And who the f! ck do u think u are, u arro!!! gant so!!! n of a bit!!! ch, talking sht about Turks like you're somehow better than us? " Yeah the British Empire destroyed your slave pirate corsairs time and time again with our Gattling guns, whilst we were banning slavery (unfortunately for us).
Also when Britain destroyed the Ottomans during WW1 was really cool & we even managed to take Constantinople back. Just a shame our government was full of pussy moralisers that gave it back. Surely after you Turks are done conquering the Balkans you won't want to follow morality in our footsteps?
Isn't it funny how insecure Turks are about being Turks yet claim to be better then everyone else lmao (they hate that more then you hating Islam).
If you were so much better then us you wouldn't feel the need to blame white people for all of your problems, immigrate over here & start revenge 🍇ing our women & girls.

[Anonymous]

Not that many

[In_Trance]

Yeah

[theskyrider]

Yes there are