Polls: Society & Politics

https://www.newsweek.com/will-donald-trump-release-jeffrey-epstein-list-2020271

I feel like there just isn't enough substantial evidence of improvement or actual plans that would benefit working class people like me.
I'm working class and sure I may not make a lot of money but I can't afford to lose Affordable healthcare, I can't afford to pay even more for goods because of tarrifs. I don't see anything good coming from not receiving compensation for all the over time hours me and people like me work. I dont see why lowering income tax for wealthier people would help people like me who aren't on the wealthier tax bracket, I'm not seeing how trump signing bills like "declassifying files on JFK, RFK and MLK Jr assassinations", "deploying military to the border", "ending funding for DEI programs", "limiting definitions of gender identity", "renaming the gulf of Mexico to gulf of America", or him pardoning January 6th defendants, or their massive book of honestly racist divisive plans in the Project 2025 his supporters made that he said he knew nothing about. Or how filling cabinet picks with unqualified people actually helps people like me living in america.
All it feels like is trump gets to do whatever he wants regardless of what people tell him they need or how worse off his actions and wants make the people who honestly supported him, he surrounds himself with billionaires that don't care at all about what happends to people in need, and maga supporters get down on their knees to either suck his dick, or kiss all 10 of his toes.
This is why I just can't support Maga and trump, I had a feeling things weren't right with him morally early on because of how he talked about American veterans, and him getting upset about losing the 2020 election, deliberately not being fully honest to his supporters that he lied when he said the election was stolen from him. If you like people who deliberately lie to their supporters, and find any excuse to justify breaking the law and being unloyal to the constitution. Then Trump is certainly your president.

Please explain your answer in the comments

Some form of acknowledgement, of abuses and admission it was wrong?

The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to consider a high-profile case that could open the door to allowing public dollars to directly fund religious schools.

The widely watched case out of Oklahoma could transform the line between church and state in education, and it will come before a court whose conservative majority has broadly embraced the role of religion in public life.

The case centers on a proposal for the nation’s first religious charter school, St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. The school would be online, and its curriculum would embed religious teachings throughout lessons, including in math and reading classes.

As a charter school, it would be run independently from traditional public schools. But public taxpayer dollars would pay for the school, and it would be free for students. The question of whether the government can fully finance a religious school has proved especially divisive within the school choice movement and across Oklahoma.

They urged the Supreme Court to take up the case, believing the conservative-leaning court would decide in the school’s favor.

A coalition of religious leaders, advocates of public schools and some other state Republicans say the proposal is unconstitutional. Oklahoma’s Republican attorney general, Gentner Drummond, argued it would “open the floodgates and force taxpayers to fund all manner of religious indoctrination, including radical Islam or even the Church of Satan.”

The OK SCOTUS wrote in a majority opinion that the school would “create a slippery slope” that could lead to “the destruction of Oklahomans’ freedom to practice religion. Still, as more Republican state legislatures move to support school vouchers and other options for parents to use public money to educate their children in private schools, including religious schools.

The case will present new education questions for the 6-to-3 conservative majority, which has shown an openness to religion in the public sphere.

1930's Germans could at least plead ignorance about what their leaders were doing (although they were delighted to take over Jewish businesses and see the true owners "leave"). Neo-Nazis don't have that; they know exactly what their beliefs lead to, and they want it.

They'll add trans people to the list of Jews, Gays, non-Whites, Gypsies, etc., but it's always just people to feel superior to and oppress.

Before everyone gets toxic (a lot going around unfortunately), I'm not referring to fathers who where denied visitation rights because they were physically/sexuality abusive. There are many fathers who are on the receiving end of vindictive mother's who uses her children as political pawns to hurt/get at her ex, not allowing the to see his children are one of the vindictive tools used. It's my opinion, if the father is making an effort to be a good father and be in his children's lives, but the mother is being vindictive, then he shouldn't be forced to pay child support until the mother stops being vindictive.

I feel like they sleep in different rooms.

What women do for money and status 🙈

Trump is ending all this woke nonsense?