Polls: Society & Politics

Not long ago, we were forced to wear face masks during the pandemic because of an invisible enemy. To me, it was nothing short of authoritarianism. Around the same time, Switzerland had banned face veils. The ironic part was that a woman wearing a face mask looked very similar to someone wearing a veil. As a result, some women simply wore face masks instead, effectively using them as a substitute for a veil, and nobody could really object to it.

You can get a pretty good idea of him from just a 10-minute talk.

He's known to be Muslim, though some people claim he converted mainly to receive less backlash from the SJW crowd.

if i earned 20 000 a year in the old system my deduction was 13 000 remember that?

but now trump raised it from 15 750 to 16 100 meening we keep 350 more. that is not taxable. now my 20 000 only 4,000 is taxable. i can earn up to 28 500 in tax bracket 10%.

In past if i earned 28 500 (i don't) but trump helped other people, insted of 13k taxable and 12k 10% =1,200 plus higher tax on remaining 1000 -120$ total 1320.

now less is taxable 12 400 taxable. and all of it is 10%. 1,240 so we keep 350+120= 500$ more of our salary. will you thank 'even trump' for helping low earners keep 500$ instead of out to taxes?

we don't need mamdani or sanders to add 500$ we need government EFFICIENCY. so will you thank trump?

No escape is possible.

Neither you nor the third graders have any weapons.

The third graders will not stop trying to kill you no matter what.

Honorable meaning deserving of respect, honest, and guided by high moral principles. It describes someone who acts with integrity, as well as deeds, actions, or titles that carry dignity or public praise.

Competent having the necessary ability, knowledge, or qualifications to perform a task well enough to meet a specific standard

Sportsmanship It encompasses fair play, adherence to the rules, and demonstrating goodwill and generosity toward opponents, officials, and teammates. At its core, it means striving to win while accepting victory with humility and defeat with dignity.

Im just curious to see what the people think, so feel free to go into as much depth as you like

Those whose ancestry originates in Asia have roughly 2% Neanderthal DNA. Those from Europe have roughly 1.5% Neanderthal DNA. Those who originate in Africa have roughly.2% (1/10th of Asian) Neanderthal DNA. It's interesting because after leaving Africa, the ancestors of those who we call "Asian" and "White" mated with Neanderthals much more frequently because of the higher Neanderthal populations in these regions.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/is-there-a-benefit-to-having-neanderthal-dna-in-the-human-genome-48346

At least 2 of the 4

I have two young kids and I am going to teach them left-wing political values and beliefs. I want them to be anti-MAGA because I disagree with most of their beliefs. I am also Christian, so I will teach them Christian religious values and beliefs. I want them to be anti-Muslim because I disagree with most of their beliefs. Is there any difference between this? I don't think there is because it's all just beliefs.

Throughout human history, most people are poor. Even today, much of the world languishes in abstract poverty. But what causes prosperity? That seems like the question was should be asking, and trying to answer. What do you think?

Which is proper?

Addictive?

Or addicting?

I've never considered myself a grammar Nazi, for all I know I could be completely wrong, but it irritates me so much when I see people using the word 'addicting'. In my mind, 'addictive' is the proper use of the word.

And so many other words are completely used wrong lately! Example: using 'loose' instead of 'lose'!

They complain about 'toxic masculinity' 24/7, yet imitate those very traits they call masculine.

They complain about men being dominant, yet model their same-sex relationships after that dynamic, with one partner even taking the other's surname.

They say women understand each other better, yet they end up having some of the shortest-lasting relationships. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4460604/ )

They complain that men are prone to violence, yet they themselves exhibit the highest rates of domestic violence.

They claim that two women can have children together, yet in the end the only thing they produce is the crap they defecate.

Take the poll.

I don't know why, but Black people commit more crimes, therefore background checks by perspective employees hurts than more than other groups. Based on this, should background checks be illegal by employees?

Let's say Jose is 26 year old male. He is Mexican and works as a mechanic. He has never been married, has no kids. He has one brother and his dad recently passed away. He ives in Tijuana and completed school through 18 years old. Mexico wins a World Cup game!!! Does that say anything about Jose?