Who do you think will win the Fenerbahçe vs. Roma match?

[Anonymous]

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

Roma.

Not because they have a higher statistical probability but because I used my remote viewing, bascially same shit as tarot cards but a bit more scientific. Although again, i am pretty sure my eyes saw that the other 3 opinions below chose Roma, even though i 100% did not pay attention to them. I read your question title and clicked away but 100% my subconscious mind saw what everyone else wrote. Still, i ran 3 remote viewing sessions in a row and all favored Roma. I knew nothing about their odds, i only googled after the psychic session but it still could've been biased.

Screenshot from my remote viewing software

Wait. Wait. I am confused about my previous bet winning. I did automation on my newest remote viewing software where i am not even supposed to know what i am betting on. It automatically fetches the sports matches and if my remote viewing is conclusive (e. g. all 7 out of 7 trials agree that one team will win which happened again earlier this week on two matches, and they were correct.) only then is anything wagered. All i see is team X and team Y and even if i click unblind (which i did) i still don't see which one is which, and it is designed to randomize. So when my predictions come from my automated server website then i might mean the opposite team if i ever talk about it. But for this match, let me see if the 4th consecutive session also favors Roma. I know it's improper but still sometimes stays accurate even when frontloaded. 4th one also says Roma and the probability of choosing them 4 times in a row is 1/16 but still far from improbable to be random noise. My server has the option to export excel to statistically validate not just how many were correct but factoring in multiplying winning by odds too (because by definition only going with the odds you will win more in quantity) so likely winners should count less than unlikely winners.

I guess all that means is that i am gathering data and i should probably limit it at that for the time being.

[Laws-Of-Existence]

As usual, once i got to the 6th trial, it suddenly started siding with Fenerbahçe by 100%. I think this is because despite psi and divination being real, our minds and behaviors must still sustain probability patterns like a law. So i had this idea to purposely create a sink of wrongness at some inconsequential point so that our minds abiding by the statistical averages can be correct when it matters.

[Laws-Of-Existence]

This probably sounds schizo but what i mean is, despite anomalous correct guesses defeating impossible odds, still then every correct guess seems to be balanced by a wrong one because some sort of law forces a regression to mean 50% average. If that's true then we can leverage it too by sinking our wrongness into something inconsequential.

[Laws-Of-Existence]

When i wrote that, it was the first time i came up with that theory that possibly some sort of law of probability forces our guesses to remain at a rate 50% correct despite the existence of psychic perception, something simply forces us to be wrong for every time we tell the future with accurate details. And after this 50% talk, the match ended as a draw 1-1. Glad i decided to further my software and canceled the bet immediately after it was placed. The real reason i canceled it is because i used a software for predicting it that had its own flaws, despite some success with it, there was an ability to use guessing strategies during the remote viewing session.

Now i predict that Tottenham will win tomorrow with my newest program i never tried before. 2 programs. One blindly gave me the two teams, which concluded that tottenham will win, and a second round was tough, i tried to make a psychic session to decide if it will be tottenham or draw but tottenham got slightly more of my sage smudging guru shit.

And it's a bit upsetting that my entire prediction perfectly mirrors the statistical odds, i hate that. Because i am risking contaminating my remote viewing. I must stop learning about the odds altogether. I might be remote viewing the odds that i later read about. I should definitely finish upgrading the remote viewing program where ai asks me followup questions when i miscommunicate, and integrate sports betting without seeing the odds. It should only take a couple minutes to update.

The main thing i wanted to say is i predicted Tottenham for tomorrow using my best method yet which i will further improve one more time.

[Laws-Of-Existence]

Damn it i am now paranoid that it will be a draw. And we definitely have a finite amount of psychic juice. CIA employees did only like one remote viewing per week. I can't now double check with accuracy whether a draw or tottenham will win, i keep getting mixed results. And i will not be surprised if the opposite team wins and my both guesses are wrong. But one good thing i learned is that the paranoia is strongest when I'm right. Usually when I'm wrong I'm cocky and confident.

[capriVib]

As a fenerbahçe fan, I’m saying this fenerbahçe might be the biggest loser team of the last five or six years.

[Asker]

Are you Turkish?

[AngryCarl3]

Roma have a good chance of winning.

[tiredpanda]

Roma 😏

[Anonymous]

Roma