Search Results: hiding his girlfriend

Warning, this is going to be a wall of text but I'll keep it as lean as possible.

What do you think, will a relationship work if the man is the technical one, uses Arch Linux OS on his device, a custom ROM on his mobile device instead of Android (that is if it's not a flip phone), encrypted his devices and data and uses strong passwords, decentralizes everything, that he uses, that he can decentralize (avoids the know your customer central exchanges such as Binance and uses something like Electrum instead), avoids using those tech giants services (especially Google and Microsoft and their email services and instead either uses something like Proton, Tuta or self-hosts his own and private Email provider) and staying off from social media (meaning he has no account on there to begin with) and resists mass surveillance and privacy violating things and trying as much to stay under the radar whenever possible and avoids using Whatsapp and instead uses Signal, the messaging app, that Edward Snowden has endorsed while his girlfriend/wife/woman is a stark contrast to it: She is avid on social media, posting regularly about many things including her private life and activities and very openly stating her personal opinions in such public places, consuming content on Tik Tok and Instagram and the likes, uses either Windows 10 or 11 or MacOS with Apple devices, has an iPhone, uses Apple products and services, maybe uses a Google account with google services like Gmail, hides nothing, has a weak if any password, uses privacy violating mainstream apps like Whatsapp and doesn't really mind the cuckware, that came preinstalled with her devices.

(This has got to be the longest sentence I have written)

Can such a relationship work or even prosper?

In my experience even just not being on social media has yielded me reactions from people, that can be described as me wearing an aluminum hat. Or those weird questions like "Who/what/why are you hiding?" like i'd tell ya, you fkn idiot

The Indiana Jones franchise movies are known for being for the most part realistic adventure films, but having very unrealistic endings. So I'm curious how you would rank the endings of each Indiana Jones movie, based on realistic ness? I will also leave a poll so you can vote for which ending pissed you off the most.

I will go first

TEMPLE OF DOOM

Despite the film's premise, a magic stone burning the enemy's hand after reciting an incanration, is probably the most realistic/believable ending.

KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL

Aliens kill the main villain by overloading her with knowledge, then they fly off in their space ship which was disguised as an ancient temple. It sounds bad, but a colony of advanced aliens hiding out in the jungle is probably more likely then some of the other endings.

RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK

After opening the Ark of the Covenant, the Nazis and a French archeologist experience the wrath of God! Indy and his girlfriend miraculously survive by "keeping their eyes shot". From a logical standpoint, we can argue that the ark may have just been radioactive.

LAST CRUSADE

After a bridge magically manifests over a bottomless pit, Indy meets a 700 year old knight and the main villain dies from rapid aging after drinking from a fake Holy Grail. Oh and his dad's bullet wounds are miraculously healed.

DIAL OF DESTINY

Indy's gang and some Nazis fly through a time fissure and end up in ancient Sicily during the Siege of Syracuse, where they battle Romans and meet the great Archimedes. I'm not gonna get into the paradoxes of why time travel isn't possible. Maybe in another post.