Search Results: sensitive

Initially I ticked all her boxes that she was looking for in a guy. She recognised I’m a nice guy, kind, sensitive and gentle. We had a good connection. I was consistent and attentive towards her, emotionally available. Made tule to see her a couple times a week.

I am also a rare find and from a very good background

Reasons she left:

She thought I was a player and cagey with my phone and untrustworthy. I was cagey as it is personal, but always reassured her and I think I showed her my phone/messages like 3 times.

I didn’t make her feel special - because I did 50/50 when I earn more than her and come from money. I have only been working for a year. I didn’t buy her flowers, I did for Valentine’s Day and bought her a plant in the early stages.

Didn’t like how I was consulting family members at the end about the relationship

I didn’t lead sometimes and did make her switch her brain off. She has a point when we went on a weekend she planned it. But she also tells me she’s not a passive person as she’s a professional.

I feel hurt. It was my first relationship. If I could go back there’s not a lot I would change just cherish her more? I didn’t make any fundamental errors, obviously times where I could’ve been nicer. There was on time I shut her down a bit because she didn’t want to move in with my family.

I want a girl that likes me for me. So I pay for the first 5 dates then split 50/50. In my case with my ex, we setup a joint bank account and put equal money inside. She agreed to this.

Then when we were about to breakup suddenly, you didn’t make me feel special. She knew I’m not looking for a gold digger and a girl that likes me for me. Especially as she knew about my background before meeting me!!

I make double her, and come from a wealthy background. I do go after pretty girls and she did say she’s used to being provided for.

Is there anything wrong with what I did?

If she actually liked me she would stick it out right? Not to mention I was good to her, consistent and caring/sensitive!

Abortion is a sensitive and controversial topic.

We're not going to get into any discussion of abortion here.

Instead, a simple poll question...

Do you know someone who has had an abortion?

Please provide no details, only answer in the poll.

And please note that all poll votes are anonymous.

A subversive attack or subversive warfare is a strategy used to destroy or overthrow an established authority from within, rather than through direct military force. Instead of using tanks or missiles, subversion uses a country’s own people, institutions, and social divisions against itself.

Core Objectives
The primary goal is to erode the political, social, or economic stability of a nation until it either collapses or becomes so weak that it can be easily controlled or replaced by a regime favorable to the attacker.

Key Tactics
Psychological Warfare & Disinformation: Spreading fake news, rumors, or biased narratives to create fear, confusion, and deep distrust in the government and public institutions.
Infiltration: Placing agents or sympathizers in influential sectors—such as the media, education, or government—to subtly shift public opinion and policy over time.
Agitation: Encouraging and funding social unrest, protests, or strikes to make the country appear ungovernable.
Economic Sabotage: Undermining a nation’s currency, trade, or critical infrastructure to create hardship and public desperation.
Cyber Warfare: Disrupting digital systems to leak sensitive data or interfere with essential services like power grids or voting systems.

The Four Stages of Subversion
Based on historical models (like Yuri Bezmenov’s), this process typically follows four phases:
Demoralization: A long-term process (15–20 years) of changing a population's values so they can no longer distinguish truth from lies.
Destabilization: Weakening the economy, defense, and foreign relations over a few years.
Crisis: A short period of chaos (like a riot or economic crash) that brings the nation to its knees.
Normalization: The attacker establishes a "new normal" under their influence, often under the guise of "restoring order."
In short: Conventional war tries to break a nation; subversive war makes a nation break itself.