Are hardships only glorified when they’re balanced by benefits?

Whenever I keep hearing stories of people complaining about sensitive people (snowflakes) and how they had it harder in their times but thanks to that they're decent people with professional degrees and businesses, I think of this:

I'm sure their families still celebrated their b-days too, there was enough money for their parents to pay their tuition or they were working at early ages and saving money, they still had opportunities to prosper, they were still living in a good environment away from dangerous zones, etc.

There has to be also be good qualities to compensate for the hardships and pain. Otherwise if life is only about the negative aspects or if the negative overrides the positive, would they still appreciate it? I don't think so. So it's not the harsher treatment only that made them progress in life. There had to be money too.

My husband's story is different. His family never celebrated any b-days, didn't have money to provide him a better education, him and his brothers ended paying for their parents' debt (saving them from getting evicted), he paid for his mother's student loan after she passed away. He claims to be traumatized by his parents arguments, physical punishment, being raised disorganized, never seeing any progress in life before meeting me, being delayed in his social skills, his mother once focusing on him being in college but them not having money to pay for his tuition, etc. He doesn't appreciate any of those hardships at all. He isn't thankful one bit.

Updates
2 mo
But those people think the hardships is the only thing that made them successful in life. Nope, despite of those hardships, they became successful. There has to be other elements, not just pain and punishment only to make it happen.
Are hardships only glorified when they’re balanced by benefits?
Post Opinion