Why do SOME people with children feel entitled to date childless people?

[Cherrylicious]

I would hear some people with children selfishly express how they feel entitled to date someone without children simply because they do not want to deal with that person's baggage meanwhile they feel that the person that they are dating without children should deal with their baggage and responsibilities which I find to be very hypocritical and such a double standard especially if that person decided to have multiple children by multiple different people but they have the nerve to go above their league and demand that someone that they date do not have children so why is it okay for them to have a child or children but not the other what makes them think that a person without children should want to have to deal with their problems or would want to mate with someone who already has children and want to possibly deal with baby mama/baby daddy drama. Make it make sense.

[Pyrofox]

I think cause so many people are horrible parents. Which translates to how good they are at being a husband or wife. If you beat your kid (psychologically or physically). You probably would be abusive in a relationship as well.

[bklynbadboy1]

I just think that's stupid and hypocritical because the was someone with out kids to give them a chance but there not willing to give the people with kids a chance. There asking other to do something that they wouldn't do

[Val713]

Well, for guys, if we have multiple kids with other girls, we don't bring as much drama. We typically aren't the one that raises them, so future gfs don't have to actively deal with the child that isn't theirs. Also, given we aren't with our baby mama, means we don't actively want to raise a kid, thus why would we want to raise YOUR kid that isn't ours. Also, usually, if a guy has kids with multiple girls, they are the one in the "higher league," hence multiple girls all ending up having their kids, so we get away with it more, that's why.

Makes sense logically, biologically, and sociologically.