Tough one, yes I would and have, but they still had an ass and/or good tits. The one in the photo looks attractive in the face, but also looks like she has not waist, no ass, and no tits. But who know honestly, if she was really fun and I enjoyed her company I would give it a go, no doubt. She is also thin and fit looking so there is something to have with it.
Ones I date where not so thin, but like I said they had ass and tits.
No prob, as long as she has subcutaneous, feminine fat in her hips, butt and thighs because she is still soft and jiggly, and when she bends over, her hips spread and look wide in contrast to her waist.
I think the girl in the photos looks very feminine.
What does that mean? My wife says that. Do want death camp survivor waists? Is that the new style?
Really weird stories. Liberators couldnt feed them properly right away or theyd die. They had to herd them back into the prison camps to keep them isolated as they treated them and fed them sugar cubes to get their metabolism back up.
As long as she is an awesome person sure. I’ve dated a girl who was 4’9” all the way up to an Amazon who was at eye level with me at 6’4. Thin, curvy, etc I can work with a lot physically for an awesome person.
I think it's decent and can't be a reason to not date someone.. it got so many other factors in it.. no one dates someone looking at their waistline lol
I love to date girl out for a date night for dinner I am singel. even I would date girl for very good part of my life is to love her hold her in my arms to warm her up even when it's cold outside I will warm her up in my bed side
