6’2 🦒
5’10
6’2 🦒 is much more attractive
5’10 is much more attractive
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Height above the ground has strictly nothing to do with attractiveness of a person.
A 4'9' woman may find a 6'3 absolutely ugly because of the difference in sizes while a 6'1 woman may think less of a 5'10 man because she has the feeling that she is looking down on him.
Attractiveness is a personal choice and me with my 5'7 will not find a man that is 6'3 attractive because he is way too tall for my taste. Each person is different and one cannot make a blanket statement about size just like one cannot make it about the looks and physique.
I am confused with your poll choices. It seems that they are redundant. I get an option for both heights twice. So, I did not vote. If I had to choose between those two heights, I would pick the guy that is 5'10". That is much closer to my height than the guy that is over 6' tall.
At 5'1" on my best day, the guy that is closer to that height is preferable. It would be even better if he was slightly shorter than that, but alas we are dealt what we are given. My fiancé is 5'11" and we make it work.
I'm not sure why this is even of any importance. Height is the last thing I look for in a partner. If he has a good personality, morals and character, I don't care what his height is. I date someone because of who they are, not how many feet they are off the ground.
6’2 is much more attractive, most women prefer a tall man, it's just how it is.
Opinion
1Opinion
You can also add your opinion below!