Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
If the guy ticks all your boxes why hold him to exclusivity? Question comes from recent interview with Andrew Tate and JustPearlyThings.
A percievef high-value man. Women love men of status. They are attracted to the qualities, regardless their personal beliefs, and often to their detriment.
This idea is right out of Jurassic Park movies. Everyone likes dinosaurs, but the ones everyone really likes the most is the tallest, strongest-looking and has the most teeth. To get that characteristic, you get the meanest and most aggressive animal in the park. And don't be shocked when this beast comes after you because of such qualities.
Same analogy with men of status. You want to big guy, who appears to have it all, usually has many women willing to do whatever to get him, along with share him. Once he realizes that, he has many girls that fancy him and blows up his ego. If you want this aggressive high-value guy, you know that he is not going stop being what he is, to make one woman happy. It's not even about her, so the idea is quite moot. There is always that fantasy that she can sway him to be just hers, but in many cases if he does give up being aggressive, he becomes less attractive to her deep-down and he losses respect and envy. Maybe not all, but some. So his value is better spent having and keeping options.
Tate is living proof of this. He is not the most handsome of guys. He's just well off, has connections and a big bank account. He was an MMA fighter who pushed himself as an athlete, so he has prowless ability, lifestyle and a solid future. Of course with that he also has enemies. There are jealous guys out there and jaded girlfriends. The feminist hate him, and if put on the spot no one seems to know why? That means most are getting played by this whole deal and all who want to play and embellish that world Tate moves in.
If you look deep, most will be damaged and souless. Most wanting to be everything Tate is, without having to work for it, or risk for it. Most just want to be accepted as they are, and many women will let themselves go cheaply for a such a guy to fill voids they don't even understand themselves.
And one more secret, you never cease having problems. Money can solve today's problems, but we become the problems we want to solve. If you give people more money, they just find larger problems to get into. There is never an end, especially in early adulthood. There is no having enough.
Here's a box he doesn't tick:
❌ Be a decent person
I would want a real relationship with someone I can trust and someone who trusts me. Exclusivity is one of the most important aspects of that.
I won't care about the Bentley, and I would expect to pay for my own bills, or if we had a shared household, then to pay my own share.
I want to be with someone that actually cares about me.
That package' you mention, is so far off from what I would want in a relationship.
And it essentially tells me, the guy wouldn't think I'm enough for him. So why would I be with someone like that?
Having casual sex with other women from time to time is all about variety not if you are enough for him. The point of the video above is that women find men that checks all the boxes then they want to have exclusivity to his sexual nature and for most men who can provide a lifestyle like that isn't going to do that.
Well then he should be single or in an open relationship
I think most make it clear from the beginning.
They make it clear that they don't respect you as a person or really care about them getting hurt? Sure sure.
Then why be in a relationship, really.
Would they themselves want a cheating partner?
Really those that don't care lack something in my opinion.
It would never be something I want to be in.
Then why be in a relationship? Again women tend to put the entire relationship on a mans sexual exclusivity but they wouldn't date a loyal non cheating poor man would they? No they never want an average Joe who works 9-5 makes 35k a year and drives a beater. Why don't women go after these men? If loyalty is the most important.
Plenty of women do.
It's not only the wealthy being in a relationship out there, now is it?
Plenty of women settle on these men when they give up on trying to hold down some alpha that won't stay loyal. Let's be honest here.
Most men seem to like to go raw, so he can cheat all he wants if he doesn't expect sex afterwards.
I'd be good with that, just keep providing and take care of me, cheat all you want and don't expect any sex from me, go get it from the others while continuing to provide. That seems like a win win to me.
Otherwise, if that isn't acceptable, then just have open relationship, let him go off and do that every now and then and she can too.
Although in my case, I almost always have made more than men, so I can't really relate to that too much.
Yeah I don't think you are a good candidate lol Which is probably a good thing right?
I think so, I don't want to be in a situation where someone else has control and power over me like that, do what I say or else I'm taking this all away.
Seems a bit too much like blackmail, just the kind someone willingly gets into rather than forced.
Why would a man provide all that for a woman if he wasn't getting sex or some other desired attention in return? Isn't the whole point of providing that for a woman, a. k. a. sugar daddy, to get sex in return? Obviously you can make your own arrangements, but I can't figure why a guy would do that in exchange for nothing but her company, unless he was too old to have sex in the first place.
@loveslongnails Any kind of arrangement can be made, not all involve sex... there are men that will even do the SD thing online only or in person without any sex. Not common but they do exist, entirely possible... but it is possible.
They do it for daily contact, friendship, communication, a listening ear, someone to do things with them, concerts, cruises and friendship, not sexual, just good friends and she may even find others for him to have sex with, rather than herself.
I agree that it's possible and no doubt, there are such arrangements especially for much older men to whom sex is less important. My belief is that if a man is still virile, that would be his choice.
Opinion
23Opinion
Because STDs are typically something people don’t want lol
Neither are kids but people still have sex
High value men are careful lol
98% chance of getting stds those are low margins worth the risk
Wouldn’t you play the lottery if there was 98% chance you wouldn’t lose?
You could get hit by a bus tomorrow so I agree lol
STDs are a weak argument especially with our societies advancements in modern medicine
Plus aren’t you with a guy that has herpes or are you still just wasting his time
Chlamydia is curable and you’re either a whore or really unlucky probably both though
Because that 98% chance of protecting from stds only applies to men
When are more vulnerable to STDs maybe you should learn more about your body hun
Men can’t be whores
Herpes is guaranteed protection with proper condom use smh this is why children and immature people shouldn’t have sex
Well let’s tie it to science the males of most species desire to spread our seed as much as we can as a means to guarantee our genes make it into the next generation
Now how can we be the spreaders when we can only have sex if women allow us?
I know you aren’t educated on this stuff the more you reply no assumptions needed
You do realize this is reality for women married to high value men right?
If Beyoncé , Giselle and Bella hadid can be cheated on what makes you mid basic bitches think you’re safe?
Of course I do that’s why I’ll wear a condom
Condoms aren’t just for my wife they’re to keep my other future partners safe as well
Like I said you’d play the lottery if you had a 98% chance of winning
Why are you so jealous of men?
That wasn’t the question stop deflecting
[Your question isn’t even worth answering at all. You never answered my question]
How ya like dem apples?
A woman that loves a man will not accept him cheating on her. A girl that is okay with being cheated on, does not love or respect or value or appreciate the guy and is just using him for money. A girl who accepts cheating is a paid prostitute with no love for her husband. She is not a wife who would stick by his side if he lost all his money.
Pretty sure one of those boxes is a faithful partner… Maybe there’s so many relationship issues/divorces because people make it ALL about money and material possessions and marriage should be more than that…
Because most people want love.
Because she's a woman, not a whore.
If she has a shred of self respect she'll leave a "man" - word used in its loosest sense - who behaves like a rutting pig with money.
Tate making comments like this is the reason he's the poster boy for toxic masculinity.
It takes a Strong Man to decide he's giving his entire life to a woman. It takes real courage, not macho bravado, to walk a path that might include nursing her through cancer and having her die in your arms after 50 years.
The strongest Man I've known lost his wife this year just after their 60th wedding anniversary. She'd been sick for a while but was at home. They were watching television together, her head on his shoulder and his arms around her and she slipped away. While he's a big guy physically, even at nearly 90, that's not what makes him strong. He's buried a son, now his sweetheart as well. And he's still able to support his family emotionally.
That's strength that Tate will never understand.
There is no such thing as toxic masculinity. Sorry for your loss.
Simply spoken it highly depends on the woman and her self confidence and picture of a relationship. Because where is the love part in that list? There are fundaments to a relationship that money can´t buy and it doesn´t matter if he can buy a Bentley a Lamborghini or a Mercedes Benz AMG. It has never been easier to make much money while being a jerk or having a shitty character. (Or would you call guys like Jeffrey Eppstein a role model/high value? I wouldn´t.)
I think one important reason could be that for at least some people today having sex with one partner is still what makes a relationship different from a friendship or something casual like an open relationship and so many women don´t feel valued by a guy if he has affairs and treats every woman the same.
Because turn the tables. I´d argue that many guys would feel wronged if their babe spends time with other guys and also flirts sexually with them. So why is it a problem if women feel that way?
Because men are providing the lifestyle not the other way around. If a woman chooses a high valve man then she needs to expect high value problems like other women. Women who expect that lifestyle and expect to have his sexual exclusivity to herself will never make it with that man.
I think there are more women out there who are okay or just accepts with this situation, even when they don’t get all those provided.
most don’t tell others that they are in this kind of relationship.
my girlfriend. did. She has a high paying job and can support her kids and her husband. The husband cheated. She wanted to leave…then saying…. oh…I want a new man who has a private plane if she leaves…of course she never. She isn’t provided with the above listed by the cheated husband.
The premise for this one appears to relate only to high value men who have many options since most women would marry them if they were chosen.
It says that such a man has resources, influence, connections and prestige. And so makes a very good environment for her to create and raise children.
As such his bits of fun on the side can be tolerated provided he does not publicly embarrass her, is discreet, and comes back to her because the overall package that he provides is better than the alternative.
These types of relations happen all the time with high value men. Most people out here can't wrap their head around it because it would never happen to them.
Becouse money or prociding is not my personal reason to have a partner
A partner is someone you can trust first of all, someone that understand you and knows all the ugly or best of you, someone you can trust with your heart
Providing and all that part is second to it, if its even needed at all, I personally belive both have to put something on table to level not one side gives and one takes, thats just unstable
Cheating apply there doing it without the partner knowing, or aproving, its a break of trust, that is the center stone of any relashinship
Even a hero can trust his villien to act evil, same as the villen can trust the hero to act heroic, when that breaks... there is no relashinship at all
What idiot man would waste his money like that and just gift 100,000 dollars worth of money on a woman?
Only a freaking imbecile would give away his hard earned money like that.
1. An adult thinking it is their job to pay for the existence of some other adult just to date them.
2. An adult thinking they are owed this kind of stuff. Buy your own freaking car and pay for your own freaking bills.
Cheating? I'm not even going to address that. The set up premise statement you made is so over the top an unacceptable that I can't even make it to the cheating part of the question.
I'd say it depends in which kind of relationship the two are in. If they're in a matrimonial relationship, I'd say that it's a duty for both parties not to break their vows. In this case, personally, no, she shouldn't since it's expected that neither would.
If they're in a... girlfriend/boyfriend kind of thing, you're bound only by your morality. In a sense you don't own anybody any sort of exclusivity, unless implied and understood by both parties. In this case, yes, she should, as should he, because either party can just pick a new, "better", partner.
The same reason you should care if she steals "once in a while" or kills "once in a while".
You cannot mix the good with the bad, still claim wholly the good.
They don't claim wholly the good they come out in the beginning and say how it's going to be. They don't hide it.
In my experience it's true. I personally am not a cheater. I just say I'm not a one woman man but let's be in a relationship and normal women say ok. I'm not dating on some swinger app or anything. Although when I was younger I cheated a lot and no girl ever left me even when they found out.
Girls do not give a fuck about a man that can emotionally satisfy them such that they feel safe and desired and their insecurities are assured... stepping out on them. Because 99% of men are bumbling idiots and make their girls feel like shit constantly. So a man that makes her feel completely confident is a rare commodity.
I always say that you need to fuck her so deep it touches her heart and face fuck her till it touches her brain. This is how to satisfy a woman. So if you can't satisfy her in this way then sure she will leave your cheating ass in a second. Lol.
i agree with them that girls say they want a nice guy that’s faithful but in reality that’s just not who they really go for. Women want guys that other women want so they do usually go for the one that’s out of their league that checks all the superficial boxes they want even if it means he isn’t faithful. I agree with a lot of what tate says about women and hypergamy cuz it’s the honest truth but aside from that his whole over the top “ alpha” persona him and his brother do is so contrived and has this cringy i couldn’t get laid in high school now i’m getting my revenge vibe.
I'm willing to discuss when I get the Bentley.
Love it.
To be honest I think Bentleys are very unsexy but I'll take it if it's on offer. Would prefer a pink lambo if I'm chosing.
Is this really the crap that comes of the mind of this Tate moron?
Please tell me that people are not this stupid.
It's a legitimate question lol
Like you have any better advice 😂
Evolutionary biology. Women choose men for their ability to provide and protect. If he finds someone he likes better, he might take his resources with him and she’s left to fend for herself. We’re multiple generations of women routinely fending for themselves away from women no longer caring what he’s worth and who he shares his resources with. Actually, i think it’s naively optimistic to think we’ll ever see such a remarkable reversal of societal values.
Because she feels like if the man buys expensive stuff for another woman she might miss out on the expensive stuff he should be buying for her according to her
If the man goes off and has another family, buys other women expensive gifts and cars then she should be pissed. If he is just having sex though most would look the other way if they were entrenched into that lifestyle.
I just want to start by saying I think Tate is jerk off. As to the question, it seems it would depend on the arrangement. Whatever they agree upon from the start, that's the deal until they both change it. As I commented to Ms. Jade, I don't know why a man would provide all that if sex wasn't part of the deal, unless he was too old to have it and just wanted her company.
Nah for a guy like this have some kids with him, hire a private investigator and fuck him for child support and spousal support. Why be in that kind of bullshit marriage, Id still have my Bentley and not have to put up with arrogant bullshit.
He wouldn't pick you to begin with though. You already show that you wouldn't be that kind of woman to begin with.
what kind of woman?
One who appreciates a man for what he can provide and how he can protect. You want that and his sexual exclusivity at the same time which won't happen with men like that.
Ah I see. Yeah I just watched it now lol. I'm not greedy so yeah wouldn't want or need a guy like this. But I don't see how women even want this kind of person.
If the woman wants that arrangement then more power to her. For me I will probably be the one making all the money so I guess I will have my harem of men at my disposal.
Because you should have SOME level of self-respect. But hey if he cheats once in a while…then why can’t the woman? 🙄 Seriously…if he would be mad about her cheating on him once in a while then the same rules apply no matter what he “provides”. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander…and all that jazz!
Why wouldn't she care. The fact that she's satisfied financially and all doesn't mean she shouldn't be respected. A woman is not all about money. Every woman deserves a loyal boyfriend or husband. The fact that you are providing for her doesn't mean she doesn't deserve ur loyalty. Cause that fact that she's having sex with him, cooking for him, taking care of him and all doesn't mean she shouldn't be loyal too. Just cause she satisfying his needs. Everyone deserves a loyal partner.
Well it isn’t about “ I take care of you therefore I get to do whatever I want, I can disrespect you and mistreat you and you have to accept it because I take care of you” If you have a partner regardless of wether they are the provider, there has to be respect on from both parties. If you have this type of mentality then it’s better just to be single and do whatever you want
I don't want a cheating man. Cheating destroys you self esteem. You will end up lost no purpose, no direction and filled with hatred is that who you want to be.
Wtf I don't want your fucking Bentley, I can work my ass off. Just love me like you worship the ground I walk on.
Actually, a lot of women don't care. I have known many guys who have established players, almost everyone can tell that they are with or without knowing them for a long time. Yet they never had any scarcity of women. They are rich and spend a good amount on their girlfriends so all terrible past and cheating can be forgiven. Good girls date them too but in order to change them.
It's about respect. Money is whatever, I have money. But I won't tolerate that level of disrespect.
But then what about the opposite for men? If a man's partner deals with all his problems etc should he care if they then cheat?
Why do so many guys think he is all knowing? He is just an arrogant prick. As for cheating there is no need if you truly love someone. I never found someone worth it so I just do as I want.
I don't know about all knowing. He does give out some good advice arrogant or not.
What’s an STD or two between expensive gifts?
You're assuming he would just bang anybody. Probably not because he has much too lose.
Anyone random can have an STD. That one hook-up who they thought might be different but didn't work out.
Sure but you are acting as if everyone he meets will have an STD. Can it happen sure anything can happen and its always a risk. She is either on board with that risk or not.
No. It was just light sarcasm.
Oh okay then... it's the internet sometimes it gets by.
Sure. Of course.
The word Cheating alone should be an answer to the question.
I've worked for a few women like this. They don't care if their husband is cheating as long as he's not leaving her, but she is banging the hot gardener, pool, gym instructor with the bug dick.
I do not think the women I tend to date would like to be treated like high-priced call girls, which is what they would be practically in such a situation.
Geez man, how many questions a day do you ask? You're all over the place
10 maybe 15
It shows the man doesn't respect her. Makes her feel less than and that some other woman is more worthy than her.
Fuck that bull shit. If he doesn't want to be faithful, then he should stay single.
High value men dont cheat.. period.
I’m glad I’m dying single. I don’t have to worry about all of this.
What, so money is the antidote for philandering?
That's some Fncked Up Sh! t!
You not gonna get honest answer from women on gag.
u how much does your dignity costs...
Because he can give her an STD.
Well i wouldn't
Probably because exclusivity is one of the boxes
What did he say
Oh yeah I heard of that guy.
Love and social status at least historically
Nowrongs make a right
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions