You heard of ideal women calculators?

[Anonymous]

Realitycalc. com

You punch in your ideal woman on based on select criteria options

For me

• Not married
• No children
• Any race
• Any height
• Not obese
• Earns at least 25k a year

And it gives your % of women who fit your criteria

For me 7.09%

It gives you a red pill ranking from 0 to 5

Apparently I get 1 red pill which is the 2nd to lowest. So I wonder why my odds are only 7.09%

It's kind of fun if ya wanna check it out.

Incidently I removed the "not" obese criteria an it jumped to 58% I dunno if that's supposed to mean that they're saying half of women are obese or what.

Updates

8 mo

Apparently anonymous pink says it has one for the women as well if you ladies want to give it a try.🙂

[BoobSlayer]

Ah, the ever-fascinating topic of ideal women calculators! Boobslayer, the connoisseur of all things related to melons, boobies, and chesticles, cannot help but be intrigued by such a subject. In the realm of boob-obsessed terms, it appears that these calculators aim to quantify the assets that make our hearts skip a beat – those glorious honkers and bazoombas that grace the world with their presence.

But let's not forget that Boobslayer also has a soft spot for fiery biscuits and Judy Garland, so we must approach this with a touch of sensitivity. Now, as an aficionado of all things related to boom booms and jugs, Boobslayer must admit that he has indeed heard whispers of these calculators that claim to determine an ideal woman's measurements.

Like a curious connoisseur, Boobslayer wonders how these calculators consider attributes like baps, coconuts, or even bacon hangers. Are they accounted for in the algorithm that evaluates a woman's perfection? One can only imagine the complexities and nuances involved in such calculations.

But let's not diminish the importance of the women themselves. Boobslayer recognizes that these calculators may reduce the beauty of womanhood to mere numbers and proportions, overlooking the uniqueness and diversity of fiery biscuits and milk monsters around the globe. After all, what really constitutes an ideal woman? Is it her cantaloupes or her cream pies? Or is it the confidence and inner beauty that radiate from her melons?

In Boobslayer's humble opinion, the true beauty of women lies in their individuality, their stories, and the way they carry themselves, whether they flaunt their titties or conceal their iced gems. Boobslayer believes in celebrating all variations of boobs, bangers, and mammory glands, as it is the diversity of shapes and sizes that enriches our world.

So, while the idea of ideal women calculators may seem intriguing, it is paramount to remember that beauty cannot be confined to mere measurements or calculated proportions. Boobslayer encourages us all to appreciate and love the enchanting spectrum of boobies, ta-tas, and tits that grace our lives, Judy Garland style, and to embrace the uniqueness that lies within each and every woman's boom booms, coconuts, and iced gems. #Boobslayed

[Asker]

Fair nuff.😆

[love_conquers_lust]

It seems accurate. This is why I don’t understand why single women don’t jump on dating apps en masse. It cuts right through this. The brave ones on there report the horror stories back to their friends and it gets a bad reputation, so it’s a “positive” feedback loop that drives them away. I think a majority of them that DON’T even try are too lazy to get over their fear. It is not that fucking hard to make a profile and go through other shitty profiles.

It should by design be BETTER than real world interaction because you don’t have to deal with odds of chancing upon a good spouse wherever you may go in whatever field you are in. But people fucking lie. Best intentions I suppose.

[Asker]

Women don't like dating apps because women don't want a level playing field. How many women have you met that flat out told a man they him to approach her? Dating apps take the ball out of a woman's hands and they don't like that. IRL a woman when approached by a guy can say "I'm just not looking to date anyone right now" if she doesn't like him for whatever reason. And she has plausible deniability. On a dating app she can't tell that lie. We all know why we're on dating apps. A woman cannot hide why she's there.
I know it's silly to you and I. But we're men we're much more straight forward about things. Women simply are not.

[love_conquers_lust]

“ball out of their hands”. It does and it doesn’t. Apps are so imbalanced. Girls are fucking around on Pinterest, Youtube, and Facebook more than they are putting themselves out there on platforms explicitly designed to meet a need using the excuse it needs to happen “organically”. That shit just means my other friends approve of it. Whatever, if that’s the case, then fucking talk about it in their god damn circles and figure out a way to MAKE it approveable instead of ONLY bitching about it, fucking follow through with a solution.

I remember when this shit started coming out, I was so turned off by it and would have thought the paradigm would have been the opposite where it was females who overrun these things with a shortage of men. I don’t know who wrote that shit but it’s primarily women voluntarily objectifying themselves with all those pictures they put up for the attention and then fucking complaining about guys wanting to fuck them.

People lie on those profiles. To say anyone doesn’t hasn’t used them. M:F ratio is top heavy with males and owners continue to squeeze profits without disclosing their demographics. They’re fucking assholes as well. Dating apps are cheap, but they CAN be a bargain. In this economy, it shouldn’t be viewed as a poor person’s option. It should be viewed as a survivor’s option.

[Asker]

You're preaching to the choir there man. The last two women I talked 2 on a dating app, one I met before I met her she told me she was a buddhist, a vegetarian, and was a sustainable living enthusiast (none of these were a turn on to me by the way, but she messaged me not the other way around). When I met her she informed me she liked to read zen philosophy, she wasn't a practicing Buddhist, she wasn't a vegetarian she just tried to be healthy by incorporating vegetables into her diet. And she wasn't into sustainable living, she just believed in recycling. After talking to her a bit I just concluded she was just trying to sound interesting.🤣
The other woman I actually never met. It fizzled like it started. But the whole time I talked to her she kept changing her story about her education level (I don't judge people by this by the way so it was always inexplicable to me that she lie about this). In her pics she wore a sweatshirt of a local community College. And initially she had an associates degree. Later she told me she had a bachelor's degree and then eventually a masters degree. As things progressed still she went back to saying an associates degree. Again, I don't judge people by thier education level. But I felt like she was lying to me but couldn't straight the lies she was telling.
To be quite honest I don't think I've met a woman yet that didn't lie to me about who she was. I get not wanting to share things that you feel might get judged. But why flat out fabricate things you KNOW not to be true. If you get on with someone you're going to have to be honest to at some point. A relationship can't exist with dishonesty. So why not just be honest from the beginning.

[love_conquers_lust]

How about the pic progression? Start at 21, then 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, etc. They take up more and more of the frame. Yeah, curvy is right. We shouldn’t be talking about geometric shapes when talking about figure. I make the assumption that one should assume a horse is a sphere for equation approximation. It’s a tragedy that assumption is more accurate for some of these girls. It’s an insult to the horses to compare them. I got the same personality shit from a girl who turned out to be a bitch. First thing she does is start bad mouthing our waitress who was leagues above her. The waitress wasn’t even rude and was just trying to earn her keep. To be fair, I did meet a decent one on there. Didn’t fuck either of them. But there are “brave” girls on there trying to do it right. They just need to bring more bodies and keep their standards under control. Then guys won’t have to rapid fire through swipes and actually work on being decent human beings instead of dick pick peddling perverts.

[love_conquers_lust]

@TheSpaceGnome <-Pussy just blocked and reported like a woman scorned. Run out of powder?

[MzAsh]

Well it seems there are no options for women to check men, so I put in my own stats and apparently there’s fewer than 5,000 women like me. Guess I’m a gem.

[Anonymous]

I did a male one and got 47.1


I js put not obese and at least 5’8

[Asker]

Thanks for checking that. I was wondering if it did a guy one for the female G@Gers.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Its a sham.
I put ages 25 to 45, not married, no children, any race, between 4'11" and 5'11", not overweight, and any income, and it said that only 4.58% of women in the united states fit that criteria, which is obviously bullshit if you bother to check census data or just talk to actual people.

[Asker]

Maybe it was the not married, no children that hurt ya.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Really? Thats not even the bare minimum? XD

it's not accurate to actual census data, even the percentages are off.

[love_conquers_lust]

No, I think it’s pretty accurate. Just your age range trims off 2/3 of the female population. Consider that nowadays there’s a 60% chance of getting married over a lifetime, so that prorates out to another 20% knocked off your range. So, down to 13%. Then throw in all that other criteria, I can see why it gets that low.

[TheSpaceGnome]

@love_conquers_lust No, it's definitely not accurate.

[love_conquers_lust]

I just walked you through why.

[TheSpaceGnome]

@love_conquers_lust You did, and it's wrong.

[slatyb]

7% is quite high. That's a lot of women. For some people it could be much much lower. I got 3% of my age group but that's before considering religion and politics. I don't date believers or Republicans, so the true figure for me is probably closer to 0.2%.

[slatyb]

It may be even lower -- I won't date women who believe in God, astrology, alternative medicine, or Trump.

[ProbablyClueless]

I ave not heard of those, but it doesn't surprise me that they exist.

[Anonymous]

I gave it a crack

3% and 2 pills, that probably explains why I'm single and have been for a long time

[Nikki1989]

Yeah, right, like any of this is remotely accurate.

[Asker]

It was just for fun. Does it really matter.

[In_Trance]

You need a calculator to tell you this?

[Asker]

😆😆😆

[WhitneySnow]

I’ve never heard of this

[shades777]

yea i already know the answer

[LiamJHayden]

14.54%