Men, would you join a squid game to compete for a gorgeous girl to become your girlfriend?

[Unit1]

You know kind of Like in ancient times?

play

pass

pink

[abc3643]

I'll quote the opening lines from the 1977 Grateful Dead masterpiece "Terrapin Station", a 16+ minute song whose first part is "Lady With A Fan".

https://www.youtube.com/embed/3I7CLy70WtI

[Part I: Lady with a Fan]

Let my inspiration flow
In token rhyme suggesting rhythm
That will not forsake me
'Til my tale is told and done

While the firelight's aglow
Strange shadows from the flames will grow
'Til things we've never seen
Will seem familiar

Shadows of a sailor forming
Winds both foul and fair all swarm
Down in Carlisle, he loved a lady
Many years ago

Here beside him stands a man
A soldier from the looks of him
Who came through many fights
But lost at love

While the storyteller speaks
A door within the fire creaks
Suddenly flies open
And a girl is standing there

Eyes alight with glowing hair
All that fancy paints as fair
She takes her fan and throws it
In the lion's den

"Which of you to gain me, tell
Will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you
If you will not take the chance"

The sailor gave at least a try
The soldier being much too wise
Strategy was his strength
And not disaster

The sailor coming out again
The lady fairly leapt at him
That's how it stands today
You decide if he was wise

The storyteller makes no choice
Soon you will not hear his voice
His job is to shed light
And not to master

Since the end is never told
We pay the teller off in gold
In hopes he will come back
But he cannot be bought or sold

[Kristierose]

My favorite song by the Great full dead is a touch of grey

[dynamicyandere]

Risk my life for a girl that I don’t know, simply because she’s physically attractive?


No thanks.


I’d take a bullet for my fiancée, but not a stranger.

[catarecute]

squid game is for desperate people so no plus i am not gay.

[ManOnFire]

Most definitely not. That would just make the female ego even bigger.

[inhua]

there was a time when men used to work together as a team and help each other through tough times

these days, it's just backstabbers and snakes in the form of simps, cucks, white knights and male feminists competing with other men via feminine ways

[zeitgeist057]

Don't forget to mention the crybaby incels whimpering about how unfair it all is!

[inhua]

@zeitgeist057 they're not wrong though. life is meant to be unfair. they keep getting lied to about how the world works and being shoved to the backburner. they're better off going MGTOW instead

[zeitgeist057]

I don't know about that. Who exactly is "lying to them about how the world works"? Did someone promise them pussy when they were growing up? I think maybe they got some delusional ideas in their head about life but only have themselves to blame. It's time to grow up and make some lemonade.

"life is meant to be unfair" is precisely the point; whining about it doesn't improve anything, it actually just makes it worse. And MGTOW is a great idea if it empowers them to feel good about life, and leaves more women for me and men who are willing to adapt and overcome life's difficulties.

[inhua]

@zeitgeist057 they've been lied to since they were boys. that being a good-hearted person is all that matters. looks don't matter. money don't matter. popularity don't matter except in truth it does

society likes to advocate for equality, respect, anti-bullying etc. but don't practice it in real life.

if you take feminism for example that supposedly promotes gender equality, there's a lot of glaring hypocrisy where men "shouldn't" judge women for their looks and men are shallow etc. but women do the same and get away with it more and have the audacity to gaslight the men that their "personality sucks" as a scapegoat for their lies

stating the truth doesn't make it whining. some people need to be told this truth rather than find out the hard way. men going MGTOW doesn't leave more women for you or other average men. polygamy only works when the man is attractive

[zeitgeist057]

There's a point where boys become men, when they start to make decisions for themselves what is important: looks, money, popularity, having a good heart (or not), and a plethora of other options as well. None of those things you mentioned are absolutes one way or the other. It's up to the individual to decide what matters to them. Maybe they let mainstream opinions decide for them, or maybe they decide for themselves. There are all sorts of men in the world. And also plenty of children running around wearing grown up bodies.

[inhua]

@zeitgeist057 not anymore they don't. cancel culture ensures you must think and act a certain way or say goodbye to all your platforms, goodbye to career prospects, goodbye to your friends/family who disapprove of your beliefs etc.

sure it could be as simple as every individual man in the world saying no to feminism, saying no to promiscuity, saying no to disrespect which is easier said than done hence why male issues won't be fixed because of the crabs in the barrel mentality.

[zeitgeist057]

I gotta call BS on that. As for "say goodbye to all your platforms", I say good riddance. I have some of those apps like Instagram, Facebook, and the less time I spend (WASTE) on them, the better. If people think "saying goodbye to your platforms" is a bad thing, then I say their values are all confused. Touch grass, bro. SFW if your instagram loses followers, people cry about that stuff and think it matters. Like I said, people gotta decide for themselves what matters to them, and if you put your focus on stupid BS like social media platforms and actually give a shit to all that, then you have built a hell for yourself and you have yourself to blame. You are the only one that can pull your head out out your own ass and figure out what a toxic hellhole all that is. Look at how miserable all those people are subscribing to that BS, how could you think that's something desirable to model your life after?

I live my own life in my own way. No issues with platforms, no issues with career, my friends are supportive and my family as well. Not all of them, which means there are some friends I've said bye bye don't need you, same thing with family. I built my own family of my choosing, and said GTFO to those who are disrespectful. I guess that takes some inner strength and confidence not everyone has. But a person has to either live in hell or do what it takes to change their situation. But sitting in hell, crying about how unfair it is, I guess that's an option. Just not for me.

[zeitgeist057]

I see people post on here questions like "omg what do I do, I don't have enough likes on my post" or "someone got more likes than I did, what do I do omg my world is ending" and I just smh. Like I don't know where to even start with that mentality. How people GAF about likes, I mean, I get it because sure approval and attention is nice, but how do people get so wrapped up they get emotionally unstable about it? People actually SELL likes and followers, like you can pay money to get your posts boosted. I'd rather have a giant burrito with extra guacamole than one million followers.

[inhua]

@zeitgeist057 you're only proving my point. not addressing the message but trying to address my personal life which I've not mentioned one bit

I don't care about likes or followers nor am I speaking on behalf of myself otherwise I'd just say the "right" things all the time. the de-platforming is not the point. it's the restriction on free speech

saying the "right" things like anti-incel rhetoric is more proof of caring for and wanting approval

[zeitgeist057]

@inhua sorry for the confusion, when I was writing "you", I didn't mean, "you, inhua", I was using "you" as in "a person". It was not meant to be personal in any way, nor was I saying that you, inhua, are or were doing any of these things. I am talking about people in general, whom it is well and easily observed participate in behaviors as I describe above.

[zeitgeist057]

just as when you wrote "you must act a certain way... you say goodbye...&c." I didn't take it personally that you were talking about me, specifically, but people in general.

[zeitgeist057]

as for "freedom of speech" a person needs to understand that basic cliche "with freedom comes responsibility" and so a person has freedom to say/do what they like, but then they also must accept responsibility for what they have said. Which may include public ostracizing (canceled) if it's far from the mainstream values, or if they commit an action that the public has deemed unacceptable (cannibalism, rape, murder), then they may suffer the public justice, even if in their own mind it was okay to eat someone else.

That can also change depending on the culture. Cannibalism has previously been acceptable in certain societies, with other examples of rape and murder being accepted practices in certain situations. Like it used to be considered impossible for a wife to be raped by her husband, or killing someone who was black was accepted for reasons that are no longer considered acceptable.

I'm of the opinion that "right and wrong" are not objective truths, and people act like they are in their short-sighted and closed minded perspectives. People seem to be so certain they are "right" but history show us repeatedly that others felt just as strongly in the past, for situations like I describe above, which the current majority now finds deplorable. In my mind, this begs the extrapolation that in the future, our current society will likely be judged as deplorable amoral jerks for some of the practices that are currently commonly accepted.

[inhua]

@zeitgeist057 I agree there are consequences to free speech, the issue is the hypocrisy behind those on the side of the status quo and those who oppose it. for example there are no consequences for false rape accusers but someone calling out that bad behavior will receive more backlash. BLM can spew as much racism towards white people but calling them out is apparently racist. mainstream values these days is liberalism. being critical of any behavior committed by someone who isn't straight, white or male is deemed racist, sexist, homophobic/transphobic etc.

and as of recent, feminist Ava Evans turned male suicide into a joke on the BBC. Laurence Fox calls her out and he is the one receiving hostility and vitriol while every news outlet from Piers Morgan to Politics Joe is trying to paint Ava as the innocent victim

the thing with history is there's 3 sides of the story. the winners side, the losers side and the true side. if holes can be poked in the logic and accuracy of some events, it's more likely to be the true history as opposed to revisionist history which is why there's an agenda to rewrite history so it fits the status quo

[DaBiggestBird]

Put my life and values on the line for a relationship more staged than a grown man dating a 12 year old in 1744, with a girl who is probably more toxic on the inside than the toxins vultures consume to help other animals not die from them. No thank you.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Nope.

Even if it was a friendly competition with zero risk involved, its still a no.

If I have to compete for a woman, she's not worth having.

The only woman worth having is the one who wants me and only me without me having to impress her or compete for her.

[Pegases]

No woman is worth all that in the grand scheme of things. But I absolutely would do this for my sisters, or mom if that's what needed to be done.

[BoopBoopBeep]

I work in D. C. I want to meet a gorgeous woman I can walk outside and grab a cup of coffee I don't have to risk my life for it.

[ProbablyClueless]

Gorgeous women are great to date until you actually date one, and then you realize that it's nothing special.

[normalice]

Unlikely. If I had nothing else going on and I was much younger or older, maybe.

[Mangospacho]

Yes, of course. I’ve never seen the show but how bad can it be? You just gotta eat a squid kinda like Fear Factor, right?

[Unit1]

If you are eliminated, you die.

[Mangospacho]

Still sounds like fun.

Unless you’re eliminated

[BryanMoore]

Do people find it this hard to find attractive women who are interested in them? 🤔🤔

Obviously not.

And that's why I picked Rose as an option

[Juxtapose]

No, how do I know I would even get along with this woman? And she's probably going to have one hell of an ego after having so many men compete for her.

[RedInnocent68]

Risk death for 😺? Surely there must be an easier way… 🤔😂

[Unit1]

With money of course.

[RedInnocent68]

Well, I’m sure that’s typically easiest, and certainly fastest, if you want to get all transactional about it. But there’s still something to be said for the charm and the volume discounting inherent with an actual girlfriend, rather than a rental 😉

[Unit1]

It is a secret, that nobody knows.

[Meropatrick]

Unless there was no other option to reproduce then yeah. Animals do end up in blood BATHS to protect their mates and so r humans wired

[disgustingweebtrash]

Lmao this would actually be like in the ancient times

Friendly reminder 17 women reproduced for every 1 man

[Unit1]

The only difference is that we don't die for it now. We are simply tax slaves.

[zagor]

I thought that pickpocket girl who was in the final 3 was hot.

[shades777]

hell no, fuck them hoes, sqidgame was about life changing money, thats why they played

[Guanfei]

Risk my life for a girl I would probably not even get? No thanks.

[JesseP1nk]

Fuck no. Why would i want someone who does not want me?

[boggboss]

Lol I'm not trying to die for pussy

[Telekinetic-Potato]

Whatever happened to that logesh guy?