5%.
But there are some obvious things like age range that cuts the number. After all if I will date people 2, 5 or 10 years apart very significantly changes the numbers.
Men will typically always get higher percentages as we:
1. Normally don't mind dating up/down in age whereas many women hesitate to date younger.
2. Normally don't care about height at all as long as it isn't shockingly unusual.
3. Normally do not care about level of income at all.
So the criteria are very much going to lead to women getting much lower numbers than men. While I absolutely believe that trend is a fair representation of reality I do think these tests slightly exaggerate the difference between us. - that is men's number should be a lower and women's should be lower too. As this does not account for looks etc. So whatever your number, of a guy divide it by 5, if a woman divide it by 3 or 4. That should be a more real representation.
So yes. The test is actually too nice and gives too high numbers when considering the whole population.
Most Helpful Opinions
7.6% of all "women" in the US meet my VERY reasonable standards.
This thing is largely useless because it isn't well stratified by age. In particular, it's not even talking about "women" but about "females. When I put on literally ZERO restrictions it told me that only 78% of "women" in the US meet my standards. Presumably this means that 22% of the female population is under 18 or over 70.
When I restrict myself to a datable age range of 18-35 (again with no restrictions) I get that 28% of the females meet my standards.
Cool. What I REALLY care about is what percentage of WOMEN in THIS age range meet my standards. So let's add in my restrictions:
Adding a height restriction of 4'10" to 5'8" did NOTHING to reduce the number of women.
Ruling out the smokers, the married women and the fatties got me down to 7.6%
So that means that roughly a quarter of girls of datable age are non-smokers, non-married and non-obese. That actually sounds better than I would have guessed.
I definitely believe that I got a.19% guy. But for reference on the accuracy of this website, I put in the most average options and it still came out to only 4%.
It says 0.05 %
But I am dating one of that 0.05 % currently
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
23Opinion
I doubt that is accurate. Also I put in my boyfriend’s characteristics just for fun and it gave me a 0% chance that he exists so there is that
I wasn't even being picky on this 😅
This doesn't seem fully accurate. I put in barely any criteria at all except obesity, married, no smoking or drinking, and I was given 0.68%, which doesn't compute. I've met plenty of guys who don't drink or smoke, lol, aren't obese or married, lol. But hey, I live in Canada. Maybe things are different here.
Okay but literally:
Wants kids: Yes
Age: 18-26
Height: 5"6 - 6"4
Minimum income: $0
Ethnicity: White (because there wasn't the option to choose multiple)
Eye and hair color: Any
Education: Any
Religion: Any
Smokes: No
Drinks: No
Married: No
Obese: NoI'm sorry but if these are high standards, I'll take my house full of cats, thank you very much.
I got 3,4% and there were a lot of things where I didn't mind either way. Mainly I did no smoking, no obese, not married and I limited the age and that was enough to already bring it down a lot. It seems a bit low tbh because this doesn't include a lot of things still that can exclude more people. I knew women's percentage is usually low because of height and income etc. But I didn't think mine would be this low :). It's good to know though :) You actually have a higher chance of finding a man than a woman what did you put in to get that result? :)
This calculator produces very interesting results. Let's give everything the maximum leeway possible other than restricting to women, doesn't want kids, 18-60, no smoking, no drinking: 3.6% - 6,059,168
Repeated calculation but restricting ethnicity to white: 3.6% - 6,059,168 (Exactly the same as before.)
Repeated calculation restricting ethnicity to black: 3.4% - 5,722,547I guess there's something wrong with my abacus.
Not that in reality I would likely date an American (being realistic) in America, however went for it. I am not overly worried about height, hair colour, eye colour, education or religion. I am also not hugely bothered about education as long as she has intelligence to chat and interacts on various things.
I did exclude married (not exactly dateable) and obese (mainly as I’m active, that was about 12 million).
The hardest bit is not the physical attraction side, it’s the emotional attraction and the traits a person has. She could be stunning but if no emotional connection or she’s say homophobic, transphobic, racist etc she would not meet my standards, requirements.1.36%
of all women in the United States meet your standards
That’s 2,289,019
of 168,310,216
American women.
Wow, I pretty much only selected as a deal-breaker that I wouldn't date obese. Everything else I was flexible on. Guess that gets rid of the vast majority of them...
- u
I think the problem is i clicked exclude obese.
My guess is this, not many, probably less than 1%, in the US, that is. Outside it? I'd say about 30% of them in my age range
But such a low number is caused by me having a hard standard that she doesn't have an Onlyfans account, that alone leaves very fewThis is a ripoff of Fresh and Fit's Female Delusion Calculator.
I got 9.8% for putting in the following:
Female
18-35
4'0-5'10"
White
Any income/education/religion
Exclude married and obese
1.04%
I'm surprised. I'm pretty open minded so not really restricting much, so quite surprised it's so low. Gives a new perspective to the videos where women have really high standards and get 0.01%.All i think of is just panties i only wear panties and my google search is full of pantie searches when i was on school i like too go into the female rest room where the swimming is there i got a lot of panties out of the bags and sometimes i would matrubate and cum inside one back or i would see a lot of naked school girls and i would just mastrubate what are you're opinions about it
I'd probably agree with this actually.
I don't know why i bothered taking that quiz since I'm not trying to date an American but regardless it was 0.178%
- s
0.046% of American men meet my standards (75,890 out of 164,977,341). I really didn’t think my standards were that high.. lol! What 😆
so roughly 25% of women are in the age range that i date. and of that 25% i'm roughly attracted to 20%. that makes an overall 5%. no exact numbers. just rough estimations based on educated guesses.
0.28% of men but I limited the age to 22-28 so I think it was because of that
0.8 percent. That can't be right. I'm not that fussy!
Learn more