https://keeper.ai/tools/calculator

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
According to that, I am looking for a woman that matches 7.4% of the population, and when I do it in reverse to see how rare I am, it shows 0.044% chance of them finding someone like me.
It is actually still lower than those numbers though when considering morals, common interests, facial appeal, no tattoos, etc.
Low quality people are very common, but people with good/desirable traits are much more rare.
I've done this too. My question is... where do you put your stats? Do you put your age in the middle of the range or start the range with your age?
I got 1.92% which sounds about right. The only thing I tweaked on the sight was increasing the minimum height requirement in the thing which should have broadened my options. I also dropped the minimum required income to 0 and changed the age range from 25-40 to -25-35 other than that it's all baseline. Given my experiences dating I think this test might actually be pretty damn accurate.
Opinion
19Opinion
I don’t know about the calculator but I will say that standards for most people does change over time. For some things people mature about and other times people learn from past relationships things to look out for.
Many people don’t really know what they want until they find it. They think one type of person will make them happy and when that relationship is unfulfilling they look for someone else. You’ll notice that some people have a “type” that they date. But eventually they marry someone whose the furthest thing from who they used to date.
As for me my standards are that someone has to be loyal. Emotionally supportive. Kind. Genuine. Honest. Things along those lines more character traits that someone chooses to be.
I really don't even think about it I don't even really care about it all I need is one person that's what I look for when I'm looking and soon I will start looking so maybe I'll let you know then
I got 0.036%
Had that been accurate, I'd say its much lower, because of all the things it didn't list.
but I picked:
Women
doesn't want kids
25-40
4' 0" - 5'10"
min income of 0 (because I want her co-heading my home business anyway)
Atheist
Doesn't smoke
Doesn't drink
isn't married
isn't obese
if you go buy the census, or even just experience being out and about, it is not 0.36%, its way higher than that.
That calculator is definitely using inaccurate data, I run across women who meet the above criteria very often, its the hobbies and interests points that are a bit scarcer, but still not anywhere near as scarce as that...
I did it a second time just to see if its bs on the guy end too, I replaced the gender with male to try and see how common guys like me are according to this, according to that nonsense AI, it said men like me are 0.108% of the population. Which if I do the math would mean the large majority of guys I know don't exist.
1.64% lol
And that's with no preference for income, smoking, drinking.
Age 37 to 49. Don't want kids.
That's it lol. Can't believe would be much lower if I had income preference...
Maybe was my height preference of minimum 5'9?
Nope there's just a lot less people out there for everyone than they think. Being straight reduces it to half the population already. Having a specific age range reduces it to a fraction of that 50%. Having more criteria fractions that percentage many times over again.
And just imagine... that was a very simple calculator. If you include other factors, it's even less.
Haha yh 0.6% I prob wdnt find attractive and another 0.5% or so won't find me attractive... and then add in location issues lol.
And not much option on age range. I like younger guys but realistically they not gonna be long term partners so that's only reason my lowest ideal is like 37.
I thought mine would have at least been 1% (rounded up, 1 (.96%)) 25 to 45, not married, wants kids, 5'2 - 6'3, non smoker, ok on some drinking, obesity I did cut out, Christian probably limits things. 20K is low income. This is about 1%
I was curious... so I accepted obesity (Sometimes obesity doesn't look like obesity), and brought income down to 10k; 10k income is barely livable without a LOT of help. Income doesn't REALLY matter as long as she can sort of take care of most things herself. That brought it up to 2.8% Wow.
All those other things not mentioned... that probably makes it.0000005% chance of me finding anyone.
Well, since I am straight and wouldn't count the entire population that would cut out 1/2 of the population to choose from.
And since I have spent the majority of my life single and have been divorced since 1990 and dated quite a bit for many years and didn't find anyone who I would consider marrying with the exception of my late boyfriend and it's now impossible to marry him, chances are pretty nill for me.
According to this calculator

I call total BS on it.
When i go out, i find 40% of the girls attractive. And i'm flexible on over half of these criteria.
No smoking, no kids and not being married or obese. 4,4% my ass.
It's accurate. But that calculator is specific for only dating Americans. There's a lot of other criteria you could add. 4.4% is actually extremely high. I got 0.002% of the world's population when I did an in depth calculation.
That is crap but I’m attracted to maybe 1/10 women my age. Honestly the only things I need are A-slender and decent shape, B-pretty face.
Most get hung up on point A.
Don't care for personality?
8,711 out of 164977,341 (its American focused webpage) Not bad when only one needs to like me back.
I'm down for fun. I can host and aisle drive. I like to play and have lot's of physical fun. It's p for p if you're down. I won't break the bank. I'm 100% disease free. HMU on telegram: @rosery2
@Happyday111 no idea what you have said or why you wouldn't break a bank. Im an adult and dont play. fun fact On the 14th July 2013 the world's last telegram was sent. The last telegram was sent from India – the last major country to shut down its 163 year old telegram service. The service was no longer needed, as e-mail and texting had replaced the telegraph and bicycle telegram messengers.
No sure how you are still using Telegram.
This is my number you can call me or chat with the number 410-849-0101 . I use telegram it works good here
Where in American don you live
Where do you live in America?
@Happyday111 no, i dont need friends like this im not a lesbian and fed up with lesbians trying to turn us straight women
@virtualwasp It's just a scammer. Probably located in India. Ignore anyone that shares their number like this online.
Filled out the whole dam thing and still don't know my percentage , where do you get it from?
0.188%
of all men in the United States who are in my age range and want kids lol
0.0086% which I’m honestly fine with anyway bc I’m aro/ace anyhow lol
Less than 5% according to this, but it's probably still less than that.
5.4%, but the calculator is inaccurate. I ran my own exact specs and it said I do not exist. as in 0%
That would mean your specs are incorrect
0.02% is about right. I don't date believers.
84,155
Or.05%
Well I can give up now. 😂
Lol.
Can't give you an exact number but it's certainly only a fraction of 1%.
78% if I choose the max, allowable range for everything
My dating standards are born female and alive 18 or older….
About 6 to 16 percent 💯😊😊👀
I'm just so fussy happily 😔
6 to 16% is an extremely high percentage of the population you can date
I’m guessing about 5-10 percent
I think it would be less than that
LOL, 0.24%!
.05%
I tried it again today and got 4.4% 🤔
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions