Now when but how.
There can't be anything in between.
So the parent laid eggs and then the babies later had sex and had babies.
Now when but how.
First of all, let me introduce myself. I'm a know-it-all. ᅠ
Secondly, I have nothing to say.
1978, when the first test tube baby or in vitro fertilization was conducted. all the others weren't "created". they evolved from Brasilodon quadrangularis which is considered the first mammal which evolved from Cynodonts (which weren't mammales) roughly 225 million years ago.
and those all go back to the first self replicating rna molecules which emerged as a chemical process involving Ribose sugar, and a Nucleic Acid (hence the name) consisting of adenine, guanine , cytosine, or uracil. this is the starting point of where we distinguish "dead matter" from "living matter". this later evolved to Deoxyribonucleic acid (or DNA), which to this day you and me are made of. those were chemicals that were plentiful on the planet and were probably solved from minerals through the energy of the sun and mixed in the liquid water than later existed on earth, facilitaing the chemical processes that would later form life.
and you know that you're a part of that lengthy evolution, cause a more developed variation of a particular DNA polymer is litterally still the building block of your very body. and it's different enough from mine that we can definitely say that we're different people but we can still also definitely say that we belong to the same species.
They were created as adults and with the ability to reproduce, or else they would have died out, real fast. The only mammal that lays eggs is the platypus. All others have live birth, including whales.
The first mammals evolved from therapsid ancestors in the Triassic period, around 225 million years ago. This process was gradual, driven by natural selection. Key adaptations such as endothermy (warm-bloodedness), the development of a neocortex, and differentiated teeth allowed early mammals to exploit ecological niches distinct from dinosaurs. Fossil evidence and genetic studies provide insights into these evolutionary changes, marking a major diversification in the tree of life.
@Kelley1 of course , Answers that require Logic..
Although Asker herself has no Idea what she is Asking exactly 😓 because there are multiple answers to the Question - if you see the details of question..
1) Reproduction of Laying Eggs and Sexual reproduction are not 2 different things, Eggs is part of Sexual reproduction only almost 95% of Egg laying creatures lay eggs after sexual reproduction. Some species do lay eggs without sexual reproduction too, It's called Parthenogenesis.
2) Yes, therapsid, were first Mammalian ancestors, however if you look at Shark, Sharks are not mammals but few sharks Lay eggs and some shark give birth to babies, directly.
3) While Whales are all Mammals their ancestors were therapsid, who went into water.
Error in Question is Lack of "Knowledge of Evolution" by the Asker!.. like Sharks are fishes not mammals but they Pay eggs, while Whales are mammals not fishes..
Also, Depending on Environment with time every species Evolve into choosing having eggs or Directly having babies.. It is formulated by many Archeologist that Dinosaurs Lived for 165 Million Years, that is enough time for Some Dinosaurs to become capable of Giving Birth to Babies directly without an egg stage.. if an Average Dinosaur Lived for 20-25 Years to produce babies, it's enough Generation to go by..
@Advisor Smith what about the creation by God?
@Nik1hil "Although Asker herself has no Idea what she is Asking exactly because there are multiple answers to the Question - if you see the details of question."
How does that tell I don't know what I'm asking.
There has to be stages where the animals go from laying eggs to producing babies because it is not a matter of animals choice. Viviparous mammals' reproductive organs are different from those of oviparous animals. So what kind of reproductive system was between oviparous and viviparous animals? Or the parents laid eggs then their offspring grew up and produced babies?
Opinion
28Opinion
I have several points: 1) Laying eggs is sexual reproduction because the egg is fertilized by sperm. Egg + sperm = sexual reproduction. 2) Some mammals do lay eggs. These are called monotremes (platypuses and echidnas). All female mammals (including people) have eggs. They are retained within the mother and they young is born after it is developed, being protected and nourished by the mother's body instead of outside the mother inside a shell-encased egg. Some snakes and a few lizards do this, too.
there were in fact... species in between
you had the mostly, reptilians who would lay eggs, and then... you had these reptilians things who were mammal like, and started to evolve onto something else in the middle, or intermediate
and from these ancestors, came the placental mammals (rather than eggs) which were the ones to turn into the many modern mammals we see around today, lol
It all started with a fish farming jellyfishes, evidently:
Well in between egg layers and placental mammals were marsupials. But even within reptiles, snakes do live births. Not all marsupials have pouches but they are sort of wombs. With kangaroos a very immature fetus makes it's way to the pouch and suckles there on milk.
But there is still a placental phase in marsupials before the pouch phase.
Conceptually I think we could see this progressing into placental mammals
We had hens that laid soft eggs from time to time. It's not a stretch to imagine the egg getting stuck inside and hatching that way... Then there's the whole milk thing. Mammals split off from dinosaurs before the most recent global extinction event.
It's an interesting question you should try to find in scientific literature, not social media!
(Eggs are also from sexual reproduction.)
I think all the creatures were created when Earth was created by God.
The Gods timing is different so it coincides in some ways with the evolution but definitely not the way people think of Darwinian evolution. More like the way creationism happened.
To be honest, nobody knows. But it's VERY unlikely that it happened the way that evolutionary scientists believe it did.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YvFe3Jdiv9s Abiogenesis has never - I repeat - NEVER been observed in nature or proved in a lab.
Therefore it's ridiculous to even consider as a viable scientific theory. Like hey, let's put this perfect ratio soup of amino acids together and see if we can create proteins. Even under literally perfect conditions they couldn't get it to work! They are wasting millions in research to do something they will inevitably fail at.
Nobody knows, not any person alive was there for life starting. No religion or anyone REALLY knows. It appears there is intelligent design, information inherent in DNA.
So what are you suggesting?
How drunk are you?
Better question: how was Life started? No scientific proof has ever been found to demonstrate what led non-living chemicals to suddenly make life. It defies natural law...
Nothing is ever fully known really.
Having said this, we have an idea how molecules started to form into life. It required specific conditions for it form. And there's a possible why, also answered around that. How, life especially complex life is extremely good at bringing and accelerating the downward trend of entropy. Which only always goes down. Till the universe completely expands and cools down.
Mammals are not the only animals that give birth to live young, an die there are mammals that lay eggs. Also before there was reptile and mammals there were animals that were ancestors to both that were considered both reptile and mammals. As our when reptiles prodomently laid eggs and mammals had live young I am not sure. But I am sure mammals made this adaptation because of more unstable or harsh environment. Having the young developed inside increases it's survival to development.
Fact is, God created us from a primate with an IQ so low it cannot even be rated on an IQ scale. Even the Bible tells you that humans are no better than animals, and one author even called himself a "worm".
I don't think macroevolution was the mechanism for the origin of species
A lizard got caught in a blizzard and lost his gizzard. Then he met a wizard, who said "it's cold, do you want to be a mammal?" So he turned him into a camel.
Fish wandered onto the land and developed air-breathing lungs, eventually becoming what we now classify as mammals.
Alien beings creates mammal DNA and tried it out on planed Earth.,
Some woke movement wanted a difference, and...
Voilà -
there were the mammals.
God made the beasts of the field. And every creeping thing He made.
Adam named each and everyone of them as the Lord had them come near.
Whatever the names were they appeared but lets not waste magick making more beings made of words and names
mamals still use eggs. They are fertilized in the womb.
It's called Creation for a reason.
Natural selection, same as... Oh, come ON!
With a Lego set, of course!
Gradual change over a period of time.
Evolution imao
They evolved from some reptilian species.
Same way we were. Nobody really knows
They probably evolved from some reptilian species.
Evolution
Evolution is a bitch