Would you rather bleed out or be set on fire?

[Anonymous]

[NamerOfStars]

Of the two, bleeding out. Burning is an awful way to die. And bleeding gives you options; abdominal cuts could buy you quite a bit of time, if they were in the right places, or cut the femorals and be dead almost before you know it's happening.

Given the choice, my preferred method of execution remains Death By Puppies, however.

[Dontaaa]

Bleed out, I'm pretty sure being burnt alive is one of the worse ways to die.

[Asker]

agreed

[jeemm]

Death by burning is by far the most excruciating death. Death by bleeding is by far one of the least painful deaths. So yes I'd rather die by loss of blood.

[Asker]

well said

[Iron_Man]

How about nothing at all how about living

[jeemm]

@Iron_Man There was no such option included in the question.

[Hannah_le]

I’d rather bleed out 😂.

[Asker]

on snow

[Hannah_le]

No on my bed being comfy before I die

[CapitalismFailed]

Bleeding out of course. There's some pain from the initial cuts and it might be a bit disturbing lying in a pool of your own blood but at least you're not suffering third degree burns on every inch of your body.

[QuietRunner]

bleed out

however if the set on fire doesn't result in death, I'll take that

[ItsTheNephilim]

The painless option. Bleeding out.

[Pink6o6]

Bleeding out

[Asker]

creepy end

[msc545]

Bleeding out is less painful.

[derdepedie301]

Set on fire

[Asker]

Melting

[derdepedie301]

i dont think burning would be that bad. i hate the cold anyway llz

[ChefPapiChulo]

Neither. And you can’t force me to decide.

[Asker]

yawns

[Iron_Man]

Never set on fire