





Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 





When lived in Birmingham, we had a regular meet up in a pub as part of a book club.
it was a slightly strange crowd as nearly all of us were in same BDSM group, and book club was on first Thursday of the month, Kinks on the last Tuesday of the month, really bad to get them mixed up.
The opposite to the bits above is from Terry Pratchett, a hero of mine and met him a couple of times. His writing on social side of things, etc was ahead of his time, a lot of stuff was not deliberate, it was just common sense and showed the reflection of social (and political ) life at the time of each book.
The Light Fantastic. Quote from the book.
In fact, the hero, even at this moment galloping towards the Vortex Plains, didn’t get involved in this kind of argument because they didn’t take it seriously but mainly because this particular hero was a heroine. A red-headed one. Now, there is a tendency at a point like this to look over one’s shoulder at the cover artist and start going on at length about leather, thighboots and naked blades. Words like ‘full’, ‘round’ and even ‘pert’ creep into the narrative, until the writer has to go and have a cold shower and a lie down. Which is all rather silly, because any woman setting out to make a living by the sword isn’t about to go around looking like something off the cover of the more advanced kind of lingerie catalogue for the specialized buyer. Oh well, all right. The point that must be made is that although Herrena the Henna-Haired Harridan would look quite stunning after a good bath, a heavy-duty manicure, and the pick of the leather racks in Woo Hun Ling’s Oriental Exotica and Martial Aids on Heroes Street, she was currently quite sensibly dressed in light chain mail, soft boots, and a short sword. All right, maybe the boots were leather. But not black. Riding with her were a number of swarthy men that will certainly be killed before too long anyway, so a description is probably not essential. There was absolutely nothing pert about any of them. Look, they can wear leather if you like. https://www. goodreads. com/notes/11186726-the-light-fantastic/252620-rinaldo/00a0dff7-be69-4754-b107-95bd372af40e? ref=rnsp
This article sort of shows how he was his ‘style’
www.newstatesman.com/.../core-message-terry-pratchett-s-books-was-people-should-think-themselves
If I'm being honest this isn't common ways a male speaks about women on a book there are specific books and there are other topics and categories you can't just assume because of 4 or 5 books you came in contact with this is how it is for all male authors at the end of the day it just depends on who's writing it and that's that
Nobody said all 🙂
Thank you @Smashingdoozy for MHO I need my percentage higher can't lie appreciate you 🙏🏼
1. I think it's fine. Self censorship just makes crappy books crappier. (And these examples do seem very crappy. For the first example, I have to know what's that book about and what kind of man the protagonist is. He's "from the police" but that's not a character trait. He can be a rude and negative guy and be a cop [see Chinatown]. Still, the sting and negativity in his words and how they hurt is more appropropriate for the character of an ordinary loser - that *can* be interesting to read)
2. Men don't exactly write "women". They write their ideas of women. It's not just interesting but essential to see what they have to say.
I find it exceptionally accurate at times, humorous at times, and vile at times. It's fine. I don't need to take the bad ones seriously.
A friend once said Harry Potter isn't a man, he's a woman's idea of a "good little boy" who never wants to grow up and give up on his mother. He gave me Sword of the Spirits and said "Luke is a real boy with real feelings".
And that kind of helped me. I found he's kind of right. Luke's emotions are complex, intense and real compared to Harry. Harry is mostly just concerned about not looking "bad/evil". He doesn't have much of a character development and his dogma revolves around his dead mom.
3. Good writers write deep characters, not genders. Writing deeper characters are achieved by focusing on the character's vocabulary (a clockwork orange), background, philosophy and values, regardless of his/her gender.
If you're reading books that start by describing the character's hair color and boob size, then maybe it's your choice that's bad.
Some people are just that shallow, and it reflects in their "books". (And everyone is a "writer" these days)
I fucking love looking at MenWritingWomen on Reddit. And AliensWritingHumans.
Especially when men describe boobs as though they're sentient, or expressive like a dog's ears.
It's ludicrous.
I've started buying cheap penny paperbacks written by men and writing on them in red and critiquing the writing. One, it's helping me learn how not to write shit (and sometimes there's good bits), and two, it's hilarious.
It's a really entertaining way to read and I get to feel better about my own writing skills, lol!
Opinion
27Opinion
Honestly there's no context here, it's all cherry picked to illustrate a point you're choosing to make. And leaves us unable to offer informed comments.
Why is context important - the characters could be awful people we are supposed to dislike. The books could be set at a time when that kind of thing was appropriate, in which case is the author making a point? Or the books could be written at a time when that kind of thing was appropriate, in which case we have to just accept it for what it is. It's all points that context would clear up.
Well now i don’t need to comment. thanks for this!
Doesn't really matter when you compare to other authors of the same genres they don't find it necessary to mention breasts at random times. Even if they're writing from a male perspective. It's simply bad writing. Heck Stephen king does this a lot.
Stephen King is hardly high art. The only reason you read his work is to lay claim to having finished overly wordy books that last about 300 pages too long.
You're not really responding to my comments. They still stand. For all I know they could be nonsense you've written. I don't think this is the case, but without titles and authors, your question has the same amount of content as the average posting by a conspiracy nut job. Trying to shoe horn a point into a question by cherry picking examples gives us nothing to discuss at best, while at worst whips people up into a frenzy that can't be explained in reasoned terms.
I don't know all the titles some of them are forever in a year by G. T Gottfred, It's kinda a funny story by Ned Vizzini, desperate measures by Stuart woods.
You can tell something is bad writing pretty easily from even a small section. Even if the rest of the book is ok those small parts would ruin it. It's unnecessary in most cases to be so crass and In such a weird way for the plot of the book. Like a book written from a teenage boys perspective in the 2010s would not say "breasts".
Why in a thriller would you go out of your way to say that a victim had a purse in her vagina when it added absolutely nothing to the story. Unfortunately I can't just post a series of entire books on here so there's select paragraphs to show just how weird it is.
You're taking this way too seriously 😂
Not really. You're not able to offer a response because you don't really understand what you're arguing. Obviously the quotes you've found on some feminist website, and you're trying to pass it off as your own work. But because you don't really understand how to debate a topic you're falling on your arse. Next time go with what colour popsicle is everyone's favorite if you want to ask a question you won't get called out on.
I never tried to pass anything off as my own work. You're making broad assumptions because you just want to be mad about something and argue for absolutely no reason. You're 42 why are you acting like a literal child?
Literature is art that should reflect the artist’s style. I feel much like any art, if I don’t enjoy the style I don’t partake in the art. I also find that women are also really good and at times even more graphic when building characters you can truly imagine that come to life in your head.
Some literature is art, yes. With all due respect, these aren't.
I can understand what you are trying to say. I bet it is really funny (or maybe funny is not the word for it) for a woman to read this drivel. In defense to men everywhere I just want to add that to most guys, a woman's body is still a complete mystery. It is a lot like the Holy Grail. It is not designed to be understood by men.
That's a piss poor excuse for not knowing about women's bodies. You are perfectly capable of looking things up or simply asking.
@Smashingdoozy Okay- the next time i have a question about vaginas I am going to ask you.😂😂😂😂
Go for it! I'm happy to answer
@Smashingdoozy thanks for that. 😂😂😂😂😂
I don't think nothing. Because these aren't book I've read therefore I cannot make a judgment on who they are aimed for or what there purpose is. Nor how good the rest of writing is.
Stephen king has his ending of IT in the book... which is weird as hell. But does that mean IT is a bad book? Nope.
Wow, the first one is a bit strong, not exactly a beautifully crafted and poetic metaphor.
Then it gets very weird for along time.
But Im confused as to why the last part was included; am I to understand that ladies do not infact get jiggly ovaries?
And what did you expect from books that seem like porn books? That it would treat anyone well? Porn industry is infamous for treating both men and women just as tools to satisfy sexual needs of consumers.
This happens is thriller books too 👀
It didn't happen in any of the books I read (usually sci-fi, fantasy or Dungeon core books) so maybe it is a problem of the specific authors? Every authors tries to attract readers using different lures and maybe these authors couldn't provide anything better so they decided to use that?
Im not sure if the reason for it. Perhaps more trying to appeal to the male eye while simultaneously making women want to burn the book till it's nothing but ashes.
Just your usual romance novels. They talk about men in the same way. I never read any of them for that reason. They seemed more for older single women to me.
At least one of these is a thriller 💀
I don't see how. Which Thriller? Thrillers are all about panic and terror, not sex descriptions. But who knows what it says on the screen play of a movie.
Can't say I've ever read these but can't imagine they are much different than the fabio romance novels written by women. Smut is smut no need to try and psychoanalyze it.
This happens in non smut too. The second to last one is from a book called it's kind of a funny story (there's a movie adaptation) it's about teen suicide.
Well... I have never read those books. I need context
I don't think you need context to see how terrible it is
Yeah true
WTF!! That is crap! These guys belong in jail just on how crappy their writing is. But it is wrong to talk about woman and their bodies like that.
Most of these look like they are from an amateur erotic literature website! Like chick-porn, but written by men for men! It’s ridiculous!
Who cares, if you don't like that writers writing style don't read more of his books.
Did... You... Read... It...
Sir. This doesn't just happen in smut. Most of these are not smut novels lmao
Thriller, teen coming of age, young romance. (Aka implying teenagers say breasts?)
Definitely not in that style though.
The language isn't accurate is what Im saying
😂😂😂
How widely read are these bozos? Are they high schoolers?
Ever heard of Stephan King 😬?
He has a habit of randomly mentioning breasts
This is why I advocate and carried out book burnings.
What kind of armature books were you reading? None of the books I have ever read are like that.
Who do you read? 🙂
There are thousands of male authors. The "worst" you can say is that "some male authors have written about women in this way".
And the world keeps turning.
It's pretty easy to lampoon male writers (especially bad ones) for being unable to write women characters convincingly. What women tend to overlook is that the reverse is also true.
Having said that the author of the second... er... passage has apparently never even seen a woman.
The rest were TL;DR sadly.
Others were shorter 😂
My eyes kind of glazed over.
Don’t know but I guess that’s how a man writes an erotic novel compared to a woman, it’s a lot different than a woman writing
Not erotic novels
Seems like it was written that way
Not at all
Ya the same would’ve been true for women… if they had the ability to write and publish works in the far past
In the far past? These are modern books
Nope of the ones I know the titles of they're 2010-2019 books
Your life is pretty fucking cushy if this is what you’re bitching about.
And here you are bitching
Am I though?
You're probably one of the few that bitch about everything on anyone's posts you don't like simply because they have different opinions. The definition of a bitcher.
You’re projecting an awful lot.
Mm yes I definitely go out of my way to comment on your posts in a negative manner because I don't agree with your opinions. Do you even know what projection is?
oh you only like simps who kiss your ass. Got it.
No I only like people who give me a reason to like them. You have not. Sorry bout it, you're simply just an annoyance whom I roll my eyes and laugh at every time you feel the need to be a negative Nancy. It's quite entertaining so I'll give you props for that 🤷🏻♀️
Oh no, you don’t like me? How will I recover?
You can find bad things in everything if you look closer at it…
I dont really read books written by men. Those few I've read were by high quality authors but these descriptions are so shallow and I dont like them.
"This is unfortunately common ways male authors write women."
Bullshit ^.
Literally given examples...
Yes, I saw them. A half dozen examples do not support the claim that it is a "common way male authors write about women".
I could easily find many more examples of feminists writing horrible things about men, but it wouldn't support a claim that it is "unfortunately a common way female authors write about men". It certainly happens, but it's not common.
What IS unfortunately common is this sort of divisive hyperbole that paints inaccurate pictures about men and women.
You know not everything has to be a man vs women thing right? You are a part of the problem constantly throwing up that
Oh right, your question here was not just another "women are victims of men" thing. Okay sure.
Nope it definitely wasn't
Mmm hmm
well they try. I do it much better though. But yeah, I'm not really a fan of the way a lot of guys write that sort of thing.
I thought it was good writing was there something wrong with it
This was painful to read
These are hilarious! :D :D :D
guys are kinda goofy sometimes
Nothing in particular, why?
It reads like comedy, written by teenagers
Ewwww
Nothing much its fantasy.
Picture of sexism
Very bad writing
Pretty funny though.
seems fake to me
Nope these are 100% in real books
lol das funny
You can also add your opinion below!