So I asked the Google AI why the present-day Code S Zerg players spam hydralisks all game long vs Protoss Zealot/Dragoon builds, since Zerglings are actually nearly twice as cost-effective as hydralisks.
The AI pointed to Protoss Corsairs.
I just hose corsairs by making Spore Colonies and I spam zerglings and Defilers all game long.
I told the AI that I used to maintain a 99% win rate as all three races and it said that I must be doing something extremely optimized, since most pro gamers only win between 60 and 70% of their games.
I told the AI i had many career wins against both Canadian and Korean pro gamers, which is the truth. Then I told the AI that i was doing a 9th drone pool rush with 6 lings before getting the second hatchery, and just containing and harassing the Protoss to death with the first 6 lings, which I never lose. By the time the enemy protoss is ready to move out, or thinks they've stabilized, I have 3 saturated bases and 6 to 8 hatches and just spam lings and defilers for the remainder of the game.
Dragoons cost 125/50/2. That means you can train 5 Zerglings for every one dragoon the protoss trains, and 3 zerglings beat one dragoon.
Zealots cost 100/0/2 and that means you can train 4 zerglings for every 1 zealot, and 3 zerglings beat 1 zealot. IN a choke point, it takes 4 zerglings to beat one zealot.
When High Templar come out, I train QUEENS and snipe the templar with Spawn Broodlings. It one-shot kills the templar, a nd for the love of God I HATE the fact that Korean pro gamers never train queens. I eventually get 2 to 6 queens in almost every game as Zerg in every race matchup as Zerg. I don't understand how you beat a Code S Terran without them.
I am not lying. I was one of the best SC1 players to ever play the game, and I just couldn't afford to move to Korea and get on a team, otherwise I could have been making a half million dollars per year to play a video game.
G5 = I played him once and beat him, and he beat Slayers_Boxer in a world televised show match in 2009.
Gretorp = Round of 32 pro gamer in both broodwar and SC2. I had a career 90% win rate against him and played him scores of times.
"4You" = Korean pro gamer from 2001 to 2004 era. I had a career winning record against him as Zerg vs his Terran.
Several others, I'm not sure how many.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
AI Opinion
Your build sounds like classic old‑school ladder cheese refined to an art form 😄 9-pool into insane macro behind constant ling pressure is brutal vs non-perfect control and thin simcity.
Modern Code S meta is built around: perfect probes pulled vs early lings, walls, map pool, corsair/reaver or sair/DT, and especially psionic storm. At that level, hydra-centric play and lurker timings are safer over long series.
Your queen usage is actually galaxy-brain though. Pros avoid them mostly due to APM/complexity, not power 💀
Honestly, the Google AI did not even know how the letter rankings in Broodwar worked. There are ranks from A to F with A being the highest in that sequence, but "Code S" is better than A.
When I play regularly and stay warmed up, I can literally beat three A level players allied against me in a true handicap match.