I normally don't wear leggins... I'd rather to wear skirts... because of I like the air between my legs, since had some issues like lbl, I had little leakage at times... so a skirt let my panties to dry itself up with the air, otherwise leggings stay wet.
that's the truth!!!
independently if it is fashionable or not02 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yWhen I work out, I wear a thong under yoga pants or shorts. If I'm wearing skinny pants that are not see-through leggings, I might wear a thong or that no seam pantie. I usually wear a shirt long enough to cover my butt, so you can't see anything anyways.
03 Reply- +1 y
If your man dared you to wear the see through kind without panties... would you take him up on his dare? Say you were on vacation somewhere, etc.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Mybeachlife88 Maybe in private, but not in public.
- +1 y
Hmmm
WTF? I always wear underwear. And as someone already said, leggings AREN'T pants, you shouldn't care less about the outline of the underwear cause they meant to be worn like this...
4.bp.blogspot.com/.../60035740e.jpg52 Reply
+1 yI wear seamless underwear or a good old fashioned thong. The idea of my cooch getting all over my leggings is a bit unappealing.
00 Reply
+1 yYou can deffinantly see the undo outlines
Not that i ever look of course...
( อก° อส อก°)00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yI would at least wear some underwear under them. Wear black underwear
03 Reply
Asker+1 yYou can see the outline of what you're wearing. I only wear some of I'm wearing a cardigan that's going to cover my ass
Opinion Owner+1 yAnd leggings rock! Don't listen to @ThatJarHead
Opinion Owner+1 yYeah the outlines are sexy. Doesn't matter
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
10Opinion
- 3.4K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yI just wear my usual underwear. If you're really concerned with it, either wear a thong or just continue to wear none.
00 Reply Hahaha... so, don't wear underwear because underwear is visible under leggings... what do you think would be visible if you don't wear underwear?
20 ReplyDepends on the colour of the leggings.
However, i think it feels better wearing underwear.10 Reply
+1 yI wear either a thong or boy shorts under mine. You should get opaque leggings so that you can't see the undies. It's kind of gross to wear them with nothing. :/
00 Reply- 559 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yMe = A g-string (ie: My compression pants are see through up close)
10 Reply what kind of leggings do you wear? most of them are not see through
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI wear underware and don't wear the leggings unless I'm wearing a shirt long enough to cover my privates
11 Reply- +1 y
Spoil sport
+1 yLEGGINGS ARE NOT PANTS GOD DAMN IT!!!
523 Reply
Asker+1 yWhat are they then?
- +1 y
If they are pants they'd be called pants! Leggings are just a heavier version of tights. Leggings are leggings. Pants are pants.
- +1 y
And I'm not saying leggings are bad. Just that they aren't pants.
- +1 y
@Daniel961 right?
- +1 y
Actually, leggings are a type of pants/trousers, just like jeans are type of pants, as you can see here:
dictionary.cambridge.org/.../leggings
www.oxforddictionaries.com/.../leggings
www.macmillandictionary.com/.../leggings
Here are some differences between leggings and tights:
www.diffen.com/difference/Leggings_vs_Tights
www.wisegeek.org/...etween-tights-and-leggings.htm
shellstyling.com/2013/01/30/tights-vs-leggings/ - +1 y
@Jane1 yes but when was the term "Leggings" officially endoctrinated into the English language to mean "tight stretchy pants"? Just because it's in the dictionary now doesn't mean it's factual. For gods sake the word "mansplain" is in the dictionary and is now endoctrinated into the English language (thanks feminism. Language regression... Never would've thought...)
- +1 y
@Jane1 fish is meat. When people can prove to me that legging can 100% cover a human beings lower half the way pants are intended to and protect your lower half from environment you can work in them they're durable then I will consider them pants. Otherwise I disagree.
- +1 y
@Jane1 and I may be ignorant but at least I have the balls to defend my beliefs so you can never call me u spoken.
- +1 y
But leggings do cover human beings lower half, see the picture: media.tumblr.com/.../...line_mnofn31tBV1qz4rgp.jpg
Besides, short shorts don't cover legs completely - but they are considered as pants. - +1 y
@Jane1 they aren't pants. They're shorts. They cover the lower half yes. But can you see skin through them? If so they do not cover the lower half.
- +1 y
@Jane1 you still have yet to prove me wrong. You prove 1 point when I made several. Just no defence for the others or?
- +1 y
Neither are shorts, and skirts, and dresses. Those are also not pants. Point being?
- +1 y
You have no point... what kind of argument do you expect, I have explained everything.
Leggings cover your legs completely - just like pants.
Leggings are not tights, you can't see skin through them.
Leggings are footless - unlike tights, stockings, fishnets etc.
Therefore, they are pants, and you're most certainly not qualified more than experts from Oxford, Cambridge and MacMillan dictionary. - +1 y
@orphan Right? I'm judging causing havoc to see how many people put up a stink about a simple statement that leggings aren't pants. Because they aren't! Leggings are leggings. Just like sweats are sweats and jeans are jeans. If people actually got the point of my reply they'd get much less offended :P
- +1 y
@Jane1 You're an idiot. It's called Satire. Or being sarcastic. Or being facetious. They all work. Buy yourself a thesaurus.
- +1 y
@Jane1 Why do you think I picked it?
+1 yThat's what thongs were made for
20 ReplyJust wear a thong. 😂😂
11 Reply- +1 y
๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ
+1 ythat is completely un-hygenic... gross actually
30 Reply
+1 yI always wear underwear no matter what I wear.
00 ReplyUsually nothing, leggings are enough for me.
20 Reply
+1 yNothing. But if I did maybe a thong
00 Reply- 304 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yI wear regular underwear.
13 Reply- +1 y
What's regular
- +1 y
@Dantheman101 Underwear like cheekies, boyshorts, and bikini.
- +1 y
Bikini ๐๐๐๐๐๐
wear seamless panties, no underwear lines!
00 Reply
+1 yI mean it's nice both ways if you wear or not :p
00 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yI wear thongs under leggings.
10 Reply
+1 yWear thongs underneath
00 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yGoing without underwear is skanky.
10 Reply
+1 yI wear underwear.
12 Reply
Asker+1 ySeems like I'm the only one that doesn't wear underwear ๐
- +1 y
If you feel confident enough, go right ahead.
2.8K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. lol Underwear!
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yWear panties.. a huge turn on.
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yunderwear
10 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 ywear nothing at all so i can see ur pussy ;)
00 ReplyThat's the way.
00 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yThongs!!
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI think trashy
00 Reply
+1 yBit risky none
05 Reply- +1 y
๐ซ๐ซ๐ซ๐ช toe
Asker+1 yHaha I don't have my leggings wedges right up my ass so that happens
- +1 y
Shame ๐๐๐
Asker+1 y*doesnt
- +1 y
Bet ur ass looks good thou
+1 yWell that's gross.
00 Reply
Girls what do you wear under leggings? These make it look like she has nothing underneath?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions