Why are Men more attracted to Women than Women are to Men?

[Anonymous]

Ok so my question is why are guys in general so much more attracted to girls than girls are to guys?
I mean guys find girls super attractive and everything guys do is deep down aimed impress or get girls, however girls seem to feel such little attraction to guys.
However girls say they don't even dress to impress guys so why are guys so much more attracted to girls? Its just as a guy knowing how much we crave and the things we do to impress girls and girls can't actually even give a shit.
Also this poll was what largely inspired this question
:https://www.girlsaskguys.com/sexual-behavior/q2203467-which-sex-is-more-attracted-to-the-other

[Mysterio421]

I'm going to guess that you are in America or some area that where feminism is indoctrinated to a degree. That's for another day. Girls basically want the best guys. They go for guys way out of their league and once they can't get that as they age, they settle down for a guy in their league or lower. Guys aren't as picky. If you are an attractive woman, then they guy will generally choose her. It's not always black and white but it's generally how it is. The thing is, girls have the power/selection in the beginning and it slowly switches to men having the power as men become successful. A delicious form of payback for men. There is a post on GAG right now where a 40 year old woman is single again after her boyfriend leaving. She feels like a discarded item on the shelf. Women have the keys to sex and men have the keys to relationships.

[GraveTruth]

Because women are valued by their physical appearance and men are valued by their dominence/confidence/success.

Women need to just walk around sticking their ass out, or wearing something sexy, or put on makeup.

Men have to start a company and try not to go out of business or something like that.

[Red1214]

Well, I think it has a lot to do with biology. Men tend to be attracted to women because it's in their nature to want to reproduce. Women have a more long term way of thinking, and want to be with someone they know can provide/protect them and their offspring.

[Asker]

But don't women want to reproduce as well? Don't you think it's unfair guys want girls more?

[Red1214]

Women do want to reproduce, but they tend to be more selective with their men. I don't think it is unfair, it makes sense to me.

[Asker]

What about when women have their partner, are they equally or more attracted in ur opinion?

[Red1214]

I think they are equally attractive, at least that is how it is for me.

[amphet11]

"know can provide/protect them and their offspring" in exchange for sex, which is why women are by definition whores/prostitutes.

[Red1214]

Yes, we are whores and prostitutes because we want a good future, that totally makes sense.

[Asker]

No ur prostitutes because your only interest in men is what he can do for you and your future child

[Red1214]

You should tell that to your mother, and grandmother, I am sure they would appreciate you calling them whores.

[Asker]

Ofc you wouldn't say that to them but that still doesn't mean women aren't technically prostitutes... Its their nature to be selfish

[amphet11]

"because we want a good future" can you not read and logically infer to the smallest degree? you are actually agreeing with me, and you are not intelligent enough or didn't pay enough attention to realize it. If the man being a money making prospect (giving you a good future) is a prerequisite to date or sleep with him. Then yes! you are by definition a whore/prostitute!

[amphet11]

If my dad lost his job, and couldn't get a new one, and my mom left him because of it, i would tell her to her face that she is a whore, because that is exactly what she would be, it's the truth.

[Red1214]

But you assume that women don't love people.

[amphet11]

If my mom or grandma wouldn't have gotten together with my dad and grandpa if they had not offered the opportunity of a better life through their job, then i would call them a whore, as it is the truth. Something being offensive and something being correct aren't mutually exclusive.

[Asker]

Love doesn't exist... Its all morals and instincts.
If men could they would F as many women as possible because its their instinct, only reason they dont is morals and social settings, women's instincts is to be desired and looked after/ protected.
If a man stopped looking after his women for what ever reason (out of his control) and the woman stopped getting the pampering she is use to you watch her leave him.

[amphet11]

If being a money making prospect and offering a better life through their job is prerequisite to receive that love, then they are still by definition prostitutes whores, and i have no problem in telling them that. Them loving the guy is superfluous to semantics, still a whore if the above sentence is true.

[amphet11]

I don't know who she is replying to anymore, red1214 please mention our user name with your specific reply. I believe in love in a chemical sense, i do not believe in unconditional love, it doesn't exist.

[amphet11]

And as i said, if you need that offer of a better life through money, to love and have sex with a guy, you aren't really different from the prostitute on the side of the street. Even simple English agrees with that.

[XRabbitHeartX]

I don't know what you mean. Both genders can be attracted to each other equally. The way they measure attractiveness on is just different. Guys just need a hot face and body and then it's enough. Girls need more. No one is superior to the other. It's biology.

[Asker]

Its just frustrating when guys crave and desire women so much more and everything they do is to impress them but girls couldn't give a shit and aren't even attracted to guys themselves but their personality which is also frustrating because then they may as well date girls and its nothing special

[XRabbitHeartX]

How the fuuuck do you think women don't desire men or care about them? Maybe this is why you have dating problems. Because you think like this which is very strange. Just cause a girl isn't all about viewing a guy as a object but sees more in him, doesn't mean she doesn't care or doesn't make a effort.

[Asker]

Well girls don't even seem to desire guys till guys make the effort to ask out and impress and after he pays for the first date if she likes it then she will start to feel something

[XRabbitHeartX]

Well uh yeah.. dating works like that. Just cause you oblige to a date in order to get to know someone doesn't mean you oblige to a relationship or marriage. That is why you go out on dates. If a girl likes you back, she will stay.

[Asker]

I mean thats all right but my point is girls don't experience straight up attraction, guys do. Girls dont crave guys unless he shows he desires her

[XRabbitHeartX]

Read what I wrote. Why is it so hard to hear that women actually want more from you and don't just see you as a piece of meat but actually want a emotional connection too? Is this so ugly and terrible to you?

[Asker]

Im happy they don't as us as a piece of meat but i just don't like the fact they don't desire guys at all unless guys show they desire them.
I mean i'd just like this think girls crave guys even when they aren't in a relationship like guys do

[XRabbitHeartX]

So wait, you think all these girls who crush on guys be it random guys or friends (you can see this everywhere on this site) are faking it and doesn't show desire in any way to you?

[Asker]

I never knew girls crushed on random guys? I mean actors and that I understand because they may find the characters personalities in certain movies attractive but as far as just random guys?

[amphet11]

Anthropologists say women don't even have a sexual orientation just an amorphous mess based on narcissistic sexual self affirmation. Women are auto-erotic and want to be desired more than they desire. Read this to start off with indiana. edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007. pdf Women aren't sexually attracted to anything innately male and can't be considered heterosexual, in fact the research shows women are more attracted to the female body.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 Oh dear, someone can't read :( The only thing that study showed was that " women respond primarily to the sexual activities performed by actors, whereas men respond primarily to the gender of the actors."

How you made a jump from that to "women don't even have a sexual orientation just an amorphous mess based on narcissistic sexual self-affirmation." is pretty awkward and embarrassing on your behalf.

You have literally NO idea what the study you quoted was even trying to say. Sad.

[amphet11]

"The only thing that study showed was that " women respond primarily to the sexual activities performed by actors, whereas men respond primarily to the gender of the actors." How does that not show how it is fluid and amorphous? the narcissism is because women being pleased is what arouses women most (the study shows that) rather than attraction to anything intrinsically male.

You are the one that doesn't seem to understand. Can you not discern the simple semantics at play?

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 You fall into the trap of thinking that because the woman showed some sign of arousal at the sight of another it means she absolutely is attracted to women and wants to fuck women and/or be with women. You do realize there could be many reasons why said women showed some arousal at this? There's firstly no way of telling whether the women were reacting to the man or the women or imagining they were the woman in the video. It's very much possible that a woman can notice the other woman in scences because SHE is a woman herself and can imagine herself in the act and the sensations. Therefore, increasing arousal when seeing the other woman even for a split second.

Also major problem you cannot actually know what the woman was thinking of in her brain at the exact moment in the study. For all you know she could have been thinking of her partner fucking her or a past sexual experiencing, increasing arousal once again.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 Please educate yourself on human sexuality. If you think the ONLY reason a woman can show SOME sign of arousal from a porn video focusing on the woman is because she is somehow bi or gay, you have a lot and I mean A LOT to learn!

[amphet11]

I have a masters in athro and cognitive science i understand human sexuality in a very structured sense. That's why it's fluid, if they imagine it's themselves it doesn't make a difference, as it shows they are aroused by anything pleasuring a vagina the partner doesn't matter in any measured quantitative sense. Men can get aroused by a blowjob scene, but it has to be a women sucking the dick, women will get aroused by anything giving oral to a womn, do you see how it's amorphous, do you see how it's narcissistic (you can look it up And see female anthropologists describe it as such, also in the study naked women aroused "straight" women naked man didn't, no sexual act just a naked women.

If you disagree with me you disagree with the the scientists too, there is no antithesis to this work.

[amphet11]

And the amount of anecdotal evidence is sky high too, you can eclectically see that many women who claim to be straight get aroused by kissing other girls and doing sexual things to other girls in a ffm threesome. There are even threads on here showing this.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 But it does make a difference. You are saying that the thoughts of a woman means fuck all. She can be imagining her boyfriend pleasuring her mentally while seeing say, a girl masturbating and then you just completely disregard ANYTHING she thinks about because she happens to be aroused at the state of a woman despite her thoughts possibly thinking of something entirely different.

So much for thinking thoughts lead to action.

You are assuming a woman gets turned on by just seeing something visually but completely forget that fantasies and thoughts can also lead to arousal.

In fact, what is really really hilarious to me that this whole thing is addressed in the very discussion of this study that you linked me! ". Consistent with this idea, women’s selfreported sexual arousal is positively related to imagining oneself as a participant in the sexual activities that are portrayed (Janssen, Carpenter, & Graham, 2003)." and

[XRabbitHeartX]

"One possible explanation is that women identify with the depicted female targets."

The ONLY thing all this means is that women mentally get turned on by other things. It does NOT make us lesbian, bi or any other nonsense that you mentioned of us not being attracted to males or that we want to be desired.

For a Master's person, you sure reach strange conclusions based off pretty simple and straight forward studies. Don't make a big deal out of something that it is not. I would have expected that sort of intelligence from a Master's candidate.

[amphet11]

Do you know that the same study in the conclusionary paragraph it describes women as ostensibly straight (you know what that means right?) says "The results of the present study add to a growing body of
research on the greater flexibility of women’s sexuality with
regard to sexual identity, same-sex attraction, and same-sex behavior
(Bailey et al., 2000; Diamond, 2005; Kinsey et al., 1948,
1953; Laumann et al., 1994; Savin-Williams & Diamond, 2000)" And while describing female sexuality as complex still describes it as "somewhere between straight and lesbian" So in regards to the study the obviously still see women as bisexual.

[amphet11]

read on this site even why "straight" women are aroused by lesbian porn (there are may threads). There explanation to why they are straight is that they are aroused by the women being pleasured, almost never do they mention imagining a man pleasuring them in the place of the women (surely since it's visual content, if they wanted to do that they would rather just close their eyes and imagine it). shows at least anecdotally (which is the only type of evidence you are bringing to the party). It's simply about themselves, like i explained fluid and amorphous and unable to be labelled heterosexual.

[amphet11]

Please disregard by solecism and typing mistakes, i typed that in a rush.

[amphet11]

straight male= mainly aroused by female pleasure. Gay male= mainly aroused by male pleasure
Lesbian female=mainly aroused by female pleasure. straight female= mainly aroused by female pleasure. The odd one out "straight" women. You can surely see why it is considered fluid thus by definition can'y fit the rigidity of heterosexuality, women identify with the female pleasure, well imagining the female pleasure is what gets men off too.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 This whole thing is really just getting so stretched out. It's the mere opinion and speculation that this article brings forth in its conclusion. Nowhere has it EVER been said "ALL women are 100% definitely bisexual" nor has this ever been proved or consistently found. Women will differ. You get women like me who do not even watch porn. Now you want to go ahead and say billions of women are all bisexual becaue heaven forbid a study on a very small sample size found that some women showed some sign of arousal at the sight of a woman in some sex scene of sorts for whatever amount of time (regardless of what goes on in her mind mentally. I'm sorry but to me, this is a irrational belief. It's completely irrational to base the entire female gender's sexuality based on miniscule studies that at the end, do not even 100% prove anything other than that women can get turned on.

It does NOT say women cannot get turned on by men.
It does NOT say women are all bi.

Don't be crazy pleas

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 Your last paragraphy "ty, women identify with the female pleasure, well imagining the female pleasure is what gets men off too."

So what you are saying is that men never ever think about the pleasure they will receive from sex or a blowjob ever? They don't fantasize about the feelings of a woman pleasuring them or how it will feel to be inside a woman?

Are you kidding me?

[amphet11]

"It does NOT say women cannot get turned on by men" correct, " It does NOT say women are all bi." Not in so many words, but logically infer to the slightest degree and yes it is saying that. Also read off shoot articles about the study, the head researcher (dr meridith chivers) does say women are (all) bisexual, the latest study with Dr Rieger that has a sample size of 10x as many men and women yields the same results, his conclusion was "women are either gay or bisexual but never straight".

[amphet11]

"So what you are saying is that men never ever think about the pleasure they will receive from sex or a blowjob ever? They don't fantasize about the feelings of a woman pleasuring them or how it will feel to be inside a woman?" Do you know why i used the word mainly? and as i said, they have to have the women in the scene, while women can have anything pleasuring them.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 "they have to have the women in the scene, while women can have anything pleasuring them." So... just because a few women got turned on in ONE instance from seeing a SINGLE scene that was perhaps more female focused (which as I've said MANY times could have been caused by her fantasizing about many things including being pleasured by her man), it means women as some sort of rule of thumb do not picture men in their scenes?

Your logic:
Straight male: Man pictures sexy scene of him mentally with a woman and the pleasure from the experience then gets aroused.

Straight woman: Woman pictures sexy scene of her with her mentally with a man and the pleasure she gets from the experience then she gets aroused.

Oh no, wait, the latter is totally and completely different and impossible because oh god the woman was looking at another masturbating? Therefore, she HAS to be bi. Of course! She was thinking of a man touching her sexually! How dare she be turned on

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 by imagining the pleasures she will receive by a man and call herself straight.

...

But then you go back to your little example where you said men DO think about how they will feel when they are sexually pleasured by a woman only that the woman must be on the mental scene as well...

But yet, in my scenario the woman DOES think about a man on the scene as well while she is imagining sex with him.. or being touched by him etc for that matter

[amphet11]

Like i said before "read on this site even why "straight" women are aroused by lesbian porn (there are may threads). There explanation to why they are straight is that they are aroused by the women being pleasured, almost never do they mention imagining a man pleasuring them in the place of the women (surely since it's visual content, if they wanted to do that they would rather just close their eyes and imagine it). shows at least anecdotally (which is the only type of evidence you are bringing to the party). It's simply about themselves, like i explained fluid and amorphous and unable to be labelled heterosexual." And one instance (it's many instances in one study), look up pornhub statistics, lesbian porn is by far the most popular genre of porn to the "straight" female demographic.

[amphet11]

Ill start a question now, and most girls won't say they imagine a man doing it to them. The fact that women can get tactile arousal from other women (stippers) while men don't from men is more evidence.

[amphet11]

ill find threads www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q1338141-the-appeal-of-lesbian-p-rn-to-straight-girls

[amphet11]

www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a33492-why-women-who-like-watching-lesbian-porn-aren-t-straight-why-pretty
Here i made a quick mytake, and specifically put in the line saying the only way they can be straight is if they imagine it's a boy eating them out and try to get out of their mind that there is another girl pleasing her in the scene.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 Since when is a few posts on a website asking for opinions representing billions of women? Secondly no one is denying there aren't women who are bi or bi curious. Thirdly not everyone is going to feel comfortable sharing what exactly they think of when they masturbate or watch porn and lastly once again how on earth can you claim to know what women think about when they watch lesbian porn.. seems to me you think you have superpowers.

Ultimately you are claiming that when a person is imagining a pleasure being done to them even for a split second it makes them bisxual. Now I dont know if you even know what bisexuality means. It means being sexually attracted to women and/or romantically. You do realize that imaginings one own pleasure does not mean they sexually want OTHER women right? That means every single time a guy masurbates and thinks of his pleasure and even for a few seconds perhaps without a woman in his mind only focusing on how good it feels, he is bi! Lol!!!

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 So you'd essentially call a person like my boyfriend bi because sometimes he thinks about how good the pleasure feels in his mind. Despite that he'd never want sex with a man or want to be with a man

Or even me. I don't even watch porn. But at times I think of the sensations of my own body and how good they feel so now I'm bisexual... I don't so much as look at other woman sexually or desire anything sexual from women but I'm bisexual? The idea of being sexual with another girl repulses me but hey I'm bi remember because I may have at times been focused on my pleasure...

You can't be saying this with a straight face. Like come on...

[amphet11]

"Ultimately you are claiming that when a person is imagining a pleasure being done to them even for a split second it makes them bisxual" What i have been trying to tell you the whole time, is that a man will need to imagine a woman giving him pleasure, a women doesn't , thus fluid. "for a few seconds perhaps without a woman in his mind " Doesn't happen, at least not once on over 400 test subjects (both chivers and riegers studies, plus one i haven't read), while with women, every single time it has happened it test conditions. 100% vs 0% that is far more than just coincidence. This is why women were aroused by a masturbating women (all of them) while men were not aroused by a masturbating man (none of them were roused).

[amphet11]

"So you'd essentially call a person like my boyfriend bi because sometimes he thinks about how good the pleasure feels in his mind" he is thinking how good the pleasure feels that the WOMEN is giving him! women will get off to themselves.

"Since when is a few posts on a website asking for opinions representing billions of women?" I said it was anecdotal since you want to sway away from the scientific evidence. All you are arguing with is anecdotal, "maybe this is why" search this site and look at the comments, only once has a women said they imagine a man in the place of the women that i have seen (and i myself must have made about 4 questions about it, many others have asked it too). If that doesn't count fine, but then neither does your empirical musings and we go back to the scientific which agrees with me.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 So you deny that a straight man can possibly masturbate without thinking or fantasizing about something?

It's impossible by your standards to imagine just the pleasure and sensations of touching yourself?

And when one does happen to just think of the pleasure alone you feel, you are bisexual and attracted to people of your own gender despite that you never desire to be with another person of your gender ever sexually...

Once again who ever says women do not imagine actions being done to them by a man?

You sure claim to have superpowers if you know what every single straight woman thinks about when masticating lol

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 masturbating *

Ultimately though this whole thing is getting repetitive and silly. You think you have all women figured out and assume people are bi for just being able to enjoy their own body and imagining things being done to it lol. Someone can according to you be bi even if they don't want to sexually be with their own gender. According to you everyone who masurbates thinking of only the feeling and pleasure they get are bi. This is fine with me. You can keep being delusional thinking women are all bi. I don't care as majority of men don't have that type of irrational thinking and claim to know what all women think of in their head. You think you have superpowers and can tell what goes on in women's minds which is creepy to say the least.

[amphet11]

" I don't care as majority of men don't have that type of irrational thinking and claim to know what all women think of in their head." Most men who have read the studies can't deny women are bisexual, i haven't met a man yet that i couldn't talk into believing it, there is far to much evidence.

" So you deny that a straight man can possibly masturbate without thinking or fantasizing about something?" Well technically of course they can still masturbate, but they aren't going to cum, most likely won't even get hard.

"It's impossible by your standards to imagine just the pleasure and sensations of touching yourself?" Yeah all straight men (well at least almost all) and 450odd/450odd in tests verses all the women being the opposite, the chances of that data not representing the default for a sex as a whole is near impossible, seriously are you not analytic at all? do you not see how much that data represents?

[amphet11]

Those two quotes from you just back up what i said earlier, women don't have a sexual orientation just an amorphous mess based on narcissistic sexual self affirmation. Fluid and attraction to your self, auto-erotic. You have to see how that fits now! By strict sem, antics this would mean women are either bisexual or pansexual.

[amphet11]

*Semantics

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 Once again, how do you know what women were thinking about during the tests? You keep coming up with these stupid studies and tests (mind you, there isn't even a a lot of these so called studies) but yet nowhere in the studies has it been mentioned what these women were thinking of in their brain. We only know some women reacted postiviely and showed sexual arousal signs. Once again, you cannot just assume these women were showing arousal signs because they sexually want to be with women. This is so far fetched and ridiculous that I wonder how one with a Master's degree can possibly reach that conclusion. There are tons of reasons why some women could have displayed arousal signs. Perhaps they were still thinking of sexual scenes from previous video displays? If you knew anything about women's bodies, you'd know that we can sometimes take lenthy times to get wet or aroused. You have zero knowledge on women my friend. You just keep proving this over, and over again.

[amphet11]

Yet people with PHDs in the field including women agree with me! There is no antithesis to this work, and this work has gone viral. Why would you think of things when their is a video right in front of you? Anyway, even if i am wrong (very very, unlikely) there is so much more evidence supporting me than you. And i have gone the anecdotal route and tried to pick womens' brains about what goes through their head when watching lesbian porn or porn containing only women (you can see i am slightly obsessed, trust me i have done hours and hours of it) and almost never is the reply, "i imagine a guy in place of the girl, and try omit the other girl" It's usually something like "it's hot" "i imagine i am the girl"(and when asked they don't say they imagine a man in the women's place" or "it's more sensual than straight porn". You say that a few (it's been over a 100 for me) women's opinions doesn't count, i explained you aren't even offering that.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 Oh yeah because a few measly studies is absolutely 100% a fact, no person with a PhD can ever be wrong ever and everything they say must believed as a fact. There is no speculation in the research field whatsoever. 2 or 3 studies is conclusive (even if they mention limitations and say future studies are still needed...) by your standards.

Shocking for a Master's student.

[amphet11]

That why there is peer reviewing, they are peer reviewed studies. So a lot more Dr's agree with the work. No professional has come forward to disagree with it in the appropriate fields.

[amphet11]

*that's why

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 But how can they be so sure all women are bisexual when there are many women, including myself, who do not even watch porn let alone lesbian porn. Within the porn genre hierarchy taken from ONE porn site, there are many other categories women choose too. No one has ever denied there isn't bisexual or lesbian women. How can you vouch for and support studies when it's as clear as daylight that there are in fact straight women who do not wish to partake in any same gender activites.

If the conclusion of these studies were actually applicable then it's another story but you are literally talking to a straight woman here. What about women like me then? And trust me there are many. Since when has porn habits exhibited reality too? Do you think all people actually want to do the things they watch in porn? Because from what I recall many people have said over and over (guys too) that what they watch in porn is not really even what they want in reality. What about these people huh?

[XRabbitHeartX]

I just find it ironic that you keep going on and on about how all women are bi when I myself am straight and you seem to keep forgetting this. It's nice to assume ALL women watch lesbian porn but you are wrong. I spoke to my boyfriend about this very topic and his first reaction was that he does not believe women are bi for watching lesbian porn sometimes. He said he can't just assume things without actually knowing the woman and what ticks her because as he also said, many people watch porn that do not translate into things they actually want but yet they may get turned on by it. When asked if he thinks his friends would agree he said a yes. So there's already a bunch of guys who disagree with your theory. According to you, no one can disagree with your theory because of a study or 2 but yeah, just proved you wrong just like that. Me being straight proves this too. So hate to break it to you, but yeah there are straight women out there and we are not all bisexual.

[amphet11]

So you would consider a guy straight whom masturbated to gay porn and other men? you would consider a person who masturbated to child porn as not a pedophile? ask your boyfriend that too, and he will sing a different tune. Porn most certainly represents something you desire in real life to some degree, it might not be your number one preference but there is a huge difference between preference and orientation, don't confuse them. Lesbian porn isn't just some genre that women smetimes go to either, it is BY FAR the most poular genre of porn to the female demographic, and the tests just back that up, and back up pretty much every thing i have said while only your thoughts try to back up your empirical guesses. You don't watch porn, but i guarantee if hooked up to the plesmograoph, lesbian porn and the female body would get you slightly wet, it has been the case of any women ever tested.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@amphet11 "you would consider a person who masturbated to child porn as not a pedophile?" Of course I would. Are you really, really comparing child pornography to lesbian pornography? You are delusional. I'm done with you.

[daveses]

You really aren't that smart are you? I don't usually resort to insults... but come on! Let me spoon feed you. A pedophile is by definition someone whom is sexually attracted to children, you have classified and agreed to that sexual attraction because he gets off to porn videos that have children in it. But a women who watches lesbian porn isn't sexually attracted to women? You gainsay your own analytic logic. This is not a direct comparison of child porn and lesbian porn, it is comparing how viewing pornographic material of (only) a certain group means they are sexually attracted to that group. So someone who masturbates to a video containing only children is a pedophile (he/she certainly is), but a women who masturbates to a video containing only women isn't lesbian or bisexual (they most certainly are too)?

[daveses]

Seriously girl you contradict yourself so heavily if you label that person a pedophile and the women straight. I am writing this just in case you think you read my comment and think i am siding with you and calling him an idiot. You don't have a great ability to infer much so i am making it clear, i am calling you the idiot and agreeing with him.

[XRabbitHeartX]

@daveses I don't care what you think of me or anyone who believes stupid things like all women are bisexual. Go ahead and call me names if it makes you feel bigger and wiser. That doesn't make you a man. It makes you a bully. I hope someday realize this. Have a nice day.

[Asad1ONE1]

Troll response. Many guys don't need just a hot body and face just like many girls do. Also, guys don't wear "fakeup" and still look beautiful.

[Breebabe]

I guess guys and girls are just attracted in different way? I don't know sorry

[Asker]

What do u mean a different way?

[amphet11]

1% of men can knock up 100% of women thus 99% of men are superfluous to reproduction. Human monogamy was only created so beta males can get sex, and low value women could get resources and protection. Human monogamy is a basic version of prostitution, women are prostitutes me are johns.

[amphet11]

*men are johns

[Anonymous]

Good question, and if this is true, why aren't more women accepting of my looks? If they don't matter as much, then why can't I seem to hit it off with more girls? lol

[Filomena]

There was not an option for "this is ridiculous nonsense" in that poll.

[Asker]

What about my points above? You disagree with that?

[Filomena]

Yes, i disagree.

[Asker]

So you feel a strong attraction to men and dont think men are more attracted to women?

[Filomena]

Definitely and no.

[Asker]

What about the girl in the poll that said girls aren't physically/ sexually attracted to guys unless their romantically attracted?

[Filomena]

I will concede that every person is different, but I'm definitely not alone.

[Asker]

So her opinion doesn't apply to you? Your attracted to hot guys?

[blondfrog]

They aren't its just that women are visual to our bodies the way we are to theirs

[Anonymous]

You have no idea how it is having a female stalker, she will pursue you 24/7

[XJohnCenax]

I have wondered this to:/