



Asker wants to hear from Guys only. Login to share your opinion.
She was a 6/10 looks-wise (slightly above average, but not remarkably good-looking), but her talent and charisma modified that to an 8+. She was definitely desirable to those of us who grew up listening to her music (which I still do pretty regularly).
Unfortunately for all the guys, she's a lesbian, and has no interest in getting anything from the guys. And those pics are from 40 years ago - she's in her 60s now.

She's a decade older than me, but she was a petite, feisty girl in her 20s when I became aware of her, and I've since dated just those kind of women, and it's my jam.
It's all about preference, style, trends.
But if you ask me, absolutely. I don't really want Marilyn Munroe and I definitely don't want Kim Kardashian. I want a girl who knows how to rock my world.
I love her hair. I love her expression. I like small boobs and general fitness without being a body builder. Her face is cute, innocent enough without looking fragile.
I like her outfit.
I would have been so happy in the 80's.
I went too a Headstones concert in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan in 1981. I was 11 and it was the first time I drank whiskey and smoked weed. Jett was the opener and the Headstones had hot girls in the Band and I just wanted to say that I found the whole experience to be almost biblical. If you don't understand that Jett is hot than that simply means you haven't stood in the presence.
She's gay, She can be attractive to a guy when she's not trying to look like a boy.
I think the record company had to threaten her contract to get her to look more like a girl for more album sales during those few years when the top photo was taken.
Generally speaking yeah.
Calling her ugly would be far too shallow.
She's not a full blown stunner but she's good looking yeah (or at least was)
Hahahahahahahahah see this video i posted a hundred times. She was treating these elites.
https://youtu.be/M2ohzhLlqKEAny woman that can rock messy hair like that and still look somewhere near as good as her is good looking.
Good LUCKING?
If you mean, "looking", yeah, she was okay back in the `80's. I'd fuck her but, there were MUCH hotter women back then.
She was, but not anymore. At 63 she's looking a bit rough.
Acquired taste. Gotta talk to her a lot first.
In her younger days, she was a fine singer and pretty good looking... but she's 63 now.
I'll assume you meant good looking. She was moderately physically attractive when she was younger, but not very appealing otherwise. Her persona was very unfeminine to be sure, and of course we now know why.
Not very appealing otherwise... except, that is, for her great talent as a musician. She is obviously a great song writer and performer. But aside from that, in terms of her appeal to most men... not much. Men are attracted to femininity, and she had little of that.
when she was younger

She has a look and she's always had a bad ass rocker attitude so not beautiful but sexy
I find her quite attractive, as she has a proportionate face.
I mean she's average in these old pictures but. Not really.
Nah not to me. She has too much a tom boy look I give her a 6 out of 10
good lucking woman! don't understand what you are asking here.
If you mean looking instead of lucking, oh my goth, definitely! Way better than Kim Kardashian.
Not to me. I wouldn't notice her in a crowd, just average.
In second picture yes. First one , not really.
Lucking? Don't know.
Looking - not bad in her day.
(I used to be on her road crew.)
She was never anything great, but she was nailable in her younger days.
Good lucking, I guess take her to the casino and find out
I would have to see a recent picture.
Was, for a while.
She is gorgeous.
She is avarage bavarage.
Not hot, not ugly.
there is doubt here?
She's decent. I guess I'd give her a 6.
@Guy__ Let me guess: you think she's a dude. Lol
More talent than luck.
Well she was fucking hot in the 80's!
You can also add your opinion below!