
Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age

I'd be annoyed, but not "mad", because there is no reason it would drive me insane... and "mad" clearly doesn't mean what you believe it means.
In any case, as far as I'm concerned all photographs of me are my property, and I jointly own any device photographs of me end up on... so I'm entirely within my rights to smash whatever they used to photograph me.
Like who the hell walks outside their house and thinks "yea, I still have privacy out here"
Lol, that's very cool. I'm probably going to get into a version of street photography very soon for a lifestyle page I'm starting.
I can't blv they think they have privacy anywhere!! people give it away for free from their electronics and cars and smart homes and social media. Privacy is dead.
@OddBeMe. I've seen those Karen's too. They simply understand their "rights" with ZERO corresponding understanding DUTIES of citizenship. They piss me off tbh
@Telekinetic-Potato Its fun! And honestly if you ask most people are cool with having a portrait taken. I spent $10 on a 100 business cards with my tumbler page if people are ever interested. That sets their mind at ease.
I love scrolling through street photographers feed in different cities.
That’s a really smart idea and a helpful tip! I’ll give it a shot.
Yes unless I was at some event he was taking pictures for, or he asked me first and I said yes. It's one thing to be in the background of a picture but I don't want to be the main focus of a picture without at least knowing it's going to be taken. That's kinda rude.
Rude but 💯 legal
@GOLDFISH_smile If some guy took a pic of my wife up close I'd have questions for him.
Random guy? It's legal (depending) so not mad. I would probably say something loud about Princess Diana to shake them though. I've had actual paparazzi double take me before, it made me wonder who they thought I was. lol
You might walk out lacking your own ocular focus.
The toilet cams? More a frat thing I would think.
Red schools if I may be so bold
Right..
Noted. (Installs laser sighted bean bag launchers)
Yup. Worked the last time (s) too. ✔️
Oh? I'll leave that in their feedback. They'll sell thousands now. Thanks.
I'm in. I have some excellent neighbors for trial and error.
•Adding to deals fine print.•
Opinion
6Opinion
Not only no but in public he has every legal right to do it. I respect ppls rights even if it makes me uncomfortable. Rights aren't feelings.
i would need to see the details too
@Sevenpointfive yeah lewd and purient photography is still illegal. photography in public really has no legal restrictions other than good manners
@DrPepper12 Like porn its subjective, but cops know when they see it.
Mad's not really the word I'd use. Majorly creeped out.
What’s the purpose of that unless he's reporting good news
No. It has happened more than once. Don't mind, and don't care.
Yes I would, and I am glad it's against the law in my country. Even in public, here you have a right to privacy. Frauditors should stay an American thing for all I care.
As with all law-related things, it depends! 😉
Persons that are unidentifiable (taking a concert crowd from behind) or irrelevant to the picture‘s subject (people in small scale left and right in the corners), are fine. The main legal trouble comes not from photographing, but from publishing! There have been many interesting court cases over the years.
Someone wants a picture of my ugly mug, I don’t give a shit
No, you have no expectation of privacy out in public.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions