Is eating nothing healthier/better than eating junk food?

[Anonymous]

Yes, eating nothing is healthier/better than eating junk food

No, eating nothing is not healthier/better than eating junk food

[Sonorous]

I think that would depend on the specific person's body composition and the time frame between eating. Because depending on how many calories you have stored away, you could last longer than someone who doesn't have as many as you.

It's exactly how Angus Barbieri did what he did. Because he had the fat reserves to replace food.
https://www.diabetes.co.uk/blog/2018/02/story-angus-barbieri-went-382-days-without-eating/

But you'd also have to take into account how healthy & functioning your body is. Because people with underlying diseases, illnesses, or abnormalities in whatever form they may be in, can't do that safely.

You should definitely watch these videos if you haven't. Dey b prity pakd

https://www.youtube.com/embed/APZCfmgzoS0https://www.youtube.com/embed/dFT2IKmwyfg

[Thatsamazing]

Where's the correct choice of "neither?"

[Asker]

What if neither isn't a realistic option?

[Thatsamazing]

It may be a difficult option, but it's almost always an option. Healthy food like fruits and vegetables and lean meat may be a little more expensive, but they're not that much more expensive than cheap unhealthy junk food that's high in fat and sugar. If you need to travel a little farther to a different grocery store, then take that option. Eating "nothing" is also not a good option-- if weight is a concern, people should eat less, not eat nothing.

[Asker]

MHO.

[Thatsamazing]

Thanks for MHO

[Asker]

You're welcome

[princesssnowflake]

No, it’s better to eat something rather than nothing. If you eat nothing, before starving to death, your gastric juices will have a field day with your stomach tissue. Other than that, while unhealthy, junk food can have some nutritional value. Not a whole lot, but better than eating air.

[princesssnowflake]

Thanks for MHO✨

[Asker]

You're welcome

[AlienParasite]

Depends on fat and energy storage, I suppose. If you don't storage enaugh fat or energy, it's better to eat junk food. If you storage a lot of fat and energy, then it's better to fast and use that storage until there's not much storage and then eat to get fat and energy again.

[hellacray]

Well if you plan to exercise I think it's better to eat something. Even if it is like a candy bar or a donut.

Cause that will give you some energy. Hell there's fitness channels that did the exact thing I talked about. They would eat junk food to carb up before a workout.

[CarpetDenim]

No, eating only junk food will kill you in like 20 years, but eating nothing will kill you in like 20 days.

[AzureGirl]

Eh, at least there’s some kind of value to eating junk food over eating nothing at all.

[mistixs]

Eating nothing will kill you a lot faster than eating junk food. It's better to have shitty fuel than no fuel

[N17RV]

I think you would still need nutrients in some way but then again there are people who can fast for 30 days with no problems

[beebella]

No, eating nothing is not healthier/better than eating junk food

[Anonymous]

I thought you were going to quit this site why are you still here?

[Asker]

Why would you think that?

[Opinion Owner]

Cause you talked about it.

[Asker]

Is that so

[stickytoes]

For one single meal eating nothing is healthier but if you just don’t eat and die it obviously isn’t

[omgjassy]

No, eating nothing is not healthier/better than eating junk food

[Iron_Man]

Yes but you have to eat to live