Am I the only one who noticed, that the so called science "facts" refuted each other?

[strateguy632]

"Fact a, i am expected to say i believe the age if the universe is 13 billion years old" no problem yet.

"Fact b, the age of the sun is around 4 billion years" so relatively younger. what caused them to estimate that!

The basis of the age of the sun is the RATIO of helium BUT if "Fact a is true" then at age 9bn. when sun started...

Those refuted each other. Can't you see?

the universe ALREADY had helium fused in stars so the sun, our sun HAD some helium who knows how much. In 13 - 4 = 9 bn. years lots of helium!

The sun is CERTAINLY DEFINITELY MUST be younger than they estimate maybe by half?

So the claim for sun age is BASELESS due to produced fused helium! Nobody else noticed this?

The only way to "rely on the ratio of helium" is if our sun started at the start!

Then we can use a ratio and claim 4bn. for all stars and sun far less than science claimed, Around 2/3 71% younger or just 29% of the age they claimed. As "fact". This is a ratio. They are not teaching science!

Or the sun is younger than universe and therefore must have had helium, 9bn. years worth and sun is younger! They refuted each other.

one age is definitely false. Probably both!

Am i the only one who noticed they refuted each other?

Ignorance is bliss !

having a high iq gets you in trouble or did you also notice?

Updates

1 y

1, Moments after posting this question i went to YouTube to watch old reruns but...
The google spybots who know i posted this question told youtube website to suggest a relevant video.
2, i took the bait, as they knew i would. It
MENTIONED "our galaxy is 13.6 bn. years old" this garuntees helium not only existed in 4bn. Bc. but nearby! Ensuring the conflict!

[I_am_a_human]

You lost me after the first few sentences. Please be more coherent.

[I_am_a_human]

For example, what do you mean by "basis of the age of the sun is the RATIO of helium"?

[I_am_a_human]

Ratio compares 2 quantities. What are those quantities etc?

[strateguy632]

You understand already "two" so "helium and something " i kept it simple.

[I_am_a_human]

I cannot follow your reasoning...

[strateguy632]

Okay so imagine my cola is getting flat.
Losing bubbles. Understand?
A guy estimated it is 5 minutes out of the bottle based on bubbles.
But he did not know how much bubble it was when i poured it! Understand? That is what is wrong with the sun age.
It HAD lots of helium and nearby see update.

[TheCaller]

Trust in science

[strateguy632]

Hahaha your reply is EXACTLY how science is really blind faith and a religion.

you like most people are in a religion that they call science just to fool you!