Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News I did consider this before!
If I am understanding the question, the core is to ask at what point the gap is significant enough that it is a relationship between a mental child and a mental adult. Or more simply put, at what point is it no longer a relationship between equals.
This question is extra simple for me since I am one of those extremes and spent a year or so working with the other end of it. While I will not judge someone for it, it does very much feel like dating a child in an adult's body.
When all is said and done I do not consider them dating in itself unethical. After all the mentally challenged party still understands the concept. However the mental capacity creates a sharp power-gap in the relation. From the more intelligent's side it really is like a normal adult dating a six year old. That said we see similar power distribution when only one party has the ability to procure a good income. Inequality is not what makes it unethical but rather the ability of the least able to be independent.
Also very worth to note that the lived experience for the 65 IQ person is very unlikely to be that of someone being used.
Not unethical, but maybe not advised. Frankly, I don't see someone with an IQ of 150 even being interested in someone with a 65 IQ. Individuals with IQs between 150 and 160 are considered exceptionally gifted. They often possess advanced cognitive abilities, quick problem-solving skills, and a capacity for deep analysis and understanding. They might show an exceptional aptitude for learning complex subjects and mastering various disciplines. Socially, they may find it challenging to relate to individuals with different cognitive capabilities, leading to potential feelings of isolation or struggling to find intellectual peers. However, IQ is just one aspect of a person's abilities and doesn't encompass all aspects of their personality or life success.
Someone with a 63 IQ said this.
I can write and read but slowly and no difficult words I can't do much. I don't like when people talk to me quickly because I often don't understand what they're saying I need a lot of help a day I learned to write with the keyboard and then mistakes are made anyway. I live in a home with other people like me I am often afraid when I'm out alone and can't go away alone I can only do a little shopping when my caregiver is there I don't know why I am like that it bothers me that I shouldn't wear what I want to say I'm doing it wrong I have been able to dress myself for a few years now. A nurse practiced that with me but I often forget that I have to go to the bathroom and wear diapers sometimes I can take a shower alone but then I can't I am often angry when I am not allowed to do something i want to live alone but i can't. but I also have fun when I can paint with others. I'm also angry that I don't have a baby I was not allowed to do that, the doctor said.
Smart people shouldn't breed with right-wingers, period.
right wing and left wing are equally imperceptive and sheepish
Not if they have a good body!
IQ is one of those attributes that revert to the mean so the offspring are likely to be around 100 rather than those two extremes.
I do think intelligence is over rated in a girl but I think it unlikely a 150 point person would find a 68 pointer desirable enough to have sex with.
iq doesn't revert to 100. there's a communication gap that separated people with an IQ of 150 from people with an IQ of below 120. it's nearly impossible for them to form a relationship with someone with an IQ of 100
There are quite a lot of factors in IQ but much of it is genetic and it does regress to the mean. An IQ of 65 is quite limited in abilities and might only be able to do janitor level work.
Whilst women want men to be smarter than they are and seemed to have sexually selected men to be smart, there is no evidence of the inverse.
I really don't care about how smart a girl is though I do want her to be interested in the world around her. There are a lot more important qualities for a girl to have than that.
Guy/girl relationships are sexual and sex is far more important than intelligence in relationships. I can form good relationships with cats and dogs or children and they are not at my level mental sophistication.
Great boobs and tight vaginas are going to appeal to every guy in every IQ bracket. Other than that I want her to be genuinely nice and non-disputative. A smarter girl might be highly disputative and what guy wants that?
The concept of breeding based on IQ levels raises ethical concerns, as it involves complex decisions about human relationships and reproduction. It's important to acknowledge individual rights, personal autonomy, and the diverse factors contributing to human compatibility beyond just intelligence. Love, mutual respect, and shared values are essential, while simplistic judgments based on IQ can undermine human dignity and equality. 🌟
Opinion
2Opinion
65 is literally retarded iq range
C) It's their choice, right or wrong.
you're retarded if you think people deserve a choice in everything
I don't believe that people deserve a choice in everything.
but they deserve the choice to breed retards
No, I support Eugenics (they can genetically remove the bad genes).
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!